OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
Country A recently broke off diplomatic relations with Country B when it was reported that Country B had been running a covert intelligence operation within the borders of Country A. While a spokesperson for Country B admitted the charge, the spokesperson said that it was common knowledge that all countries do this, and that Country A was no exception.
Which of the following inferences can be drawn from the argument above?(A) Country B should apologize and dismantle its intelligence operation in Country A.
(B) The spokesperson for Country B claims that Country A engages in intelligence gathering too.
(C) Because all countries engage in this practice, Country A’s outrage was disingenuous.
(D) Relations between Country A and Country B will be strained for some time.
(E) Country B would be just as outraged if it was reported that Country A was running a covert intelligence operation with Country B’s borders.
B All of the answers to this inference question infer way too much to be the correct answer to a GMAT question—except for choice B, which simply restates a sentence from the argument itself. Choice A says an apology is needed, which is way beyond the scope of this argument. Choice C goes further than the argument to make a value judgment. Choice D looks into the future. And choice E takes a “what if” position and builds on it. The best answer is choice B.