roshaun25
Why would each statement be sufficient here? Each statement only addresses one of the two limiting factors (color and number of pages), so in my opinion neither statement on its own if sufficient. Let's say that statement 1 is true - at first look you might say that Q and R need to be checked. But what if book R has a green cover? Then only Q needs to be checked. Each statement only addresses a single factor, so I'm confused how they are each sufficient.
Because the stem already eliminates Q on its own.
If page 1 is on the right, then odd pages are on the right and even pages are on the left, so pages 536 and 537 face each other and you can put a note “between” them.
But Q is the exception: page 1 is on the left, so odd pages are on the left and even pages are on the right. That means pages 536 and 537 are not facing pages in Q, so the note cannot be “between pages 536 and 537” in Q. So Q is impossible before you even look at (1) or (2).
Now look at each statement:
(1) P and S have fewer than 500 pages.
Then P and S cannot even have pages 536 and 537. Q is already impossible from the stem. So the only remaining book is R, so Ethan only needs to check 1 book.
(2) P and S are entirely blue.
Ethan remembers the cover was entirely orange, so P and S are eliminated by color. The only remaining candidates by color would be Q and R, but Q is already impossible from the stem. So only R remains, so again he checks 1 book.
Your “what if R is green” idea is not allowed because Ethan’s recollection is stated to be accurate. If the only possible book left were not orange, that would contradict the facts of the problem.