Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
26 Dec 2025, 09:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
65% (01:51) correct
35%
(01:54)
wrong
based on 251
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Several environmental advocacy groups claim to represent the interests of rural farming communities affected by climate change. Yet, many of these organizations are primarily staffed and funded by individuals from urban areas, with little direct experience in agriculture. This has led some critics to question whether these groups truly reflect the priorities of the communities they aim to support.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the criticism raised about the advocacy groups?
A. Rural farmers often prioritize short-term economic survival over long-term environmental initiatives proposed by government agencies.
B. Some of the most vocal opponents of environmental advocacy groups are also those who have historically resisted regulatory oversight of farming practices.
C. Advocacy groups led by individuals without direct exposure to the affected communities often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges.
D. Urban-based environmental organizations typically rely on policy advisors with academic expertise in climate science and sustainability.
E. Farming communities are often hesitant to engage with organizations they perceive as outsiders, regardless of the groups’ stated intentions.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the criticism raised about the advocacy groups?
A. Rural farmers often prioritize short-term economic survival over long-term environmental initiatives proposed by government agencies.
B. Some of the most vocal opponents of environmental advocacy groups are also those who have historically resisted regulatory oversight of farming practices.
C. Advocacy groups led by individuals without direct exposure to the affected communities often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges.
D. Urban-based environmental organizations typically rely on policy advisors with academic expertise in climate science and sustainability.
E. Farming communities are often hesitant to engage with organizations they perceive as outsiders, regardless of the groups’ stated intentions.
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
V40-27
26 Dec 2025, 10:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
GMAT Club Official Explanation:
The Core Logic of the Argument: The argument presents a conflict: environmental advocacy groups claim to represent rural farmers, but they are staffed by urbanites with no farming experience. Critics argue that because of this specific staffing issue, the groups likely do not reflect the actual priorities of the farming communities. To strengthen this criticism, we need to find a logical connection that proves "being from an urban area with no agricultural experience" leads to "failing to understand rural priorities."
(A) Incorrect. This is a classic "Scope Shift" trap. The argument is specifically criticizing environmental advocacy groups. This answer choice talks about farmers prioritizing economics over initiatives proposed by government agencies. While it shows a conflict between farmers and external authorities, it does not strengthen the criticism of the advocacy groups mentioned in the prompt. Farmers might hate government plans but actually agree with private advocacy groups; we cannot assume the two are the same.
(B) Incorrect. This answer choice attacks the credibility of the critics rather than addressing the content of the criticism. Pointing out that the opponents are "historically resistant to oversight" suggests they might be biased, but it doesn't help us determine if the advocacy groups actually understand the farmers or not. In fact, this might arguably weaken the validity of the criticism by suggesting it is politically motivated.
(C) Correct. This option provides the essential "logical bridge" between the premise and the conclusion. The premise states the staff lacks "direct experience" (they are urban). This answer choice confirms that groups without direct exposure "often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges." If they lack understanding, they cannot accurately reflect the community's priorities. This validates the specific reasoning used by the critics.
(D) Incorrect. This answer choice focuses on the qualifications of the staff (academic expertise). While having experts in climate science is good for the "science" side of the advocacy, it does not address the "social" side of understanding rural priorities. A group can be scientifically accurate but still completely out of touch with the economic or cultural priorities of a farming community. Therefore, this does not strengthen the criticism regarding priorities.
(E) Incorrect. This option explains why farmers might dislike or ignore the groups (because they perceive them as outsiders). However, it does not prove that the groups' actual priorities are misaligned. A group could have the perfect plan that truly reflects the farmers' best interests, but simply be ignored due to mistrust. This explains the relationship dynamic, but it doesn't prove the specific criticism that the groups are misinformed or have the wrong priorities.
General Discussion
26 Dec 2025, 09:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
The criticism that being raised against advocacy group is that where these group really reflect priorities of those are affected here reasoning being they are being backed by urban companies with little experience in these field of concern.
If we want to strengthen this then we need evidence to show that they really lacked the exposure.
A) If farmer are using the strategy designed by advocacy group then it weakens. eliminate
B) It talks about other groups who are kind of opposing these group does not create strong evidence that they lack exposure so little out of context hence eliminate
C) It directly supports with the evidence hence keep
D) It kind of saying that urban companies are using expert from concerned field then it doesnt strengths the reasoning.
E) It relies on other factor other than concerned reasoning for the farmers not relying on them hence irrelevant hence eliminate
SO Answer (C)
If we want to strengthen this then we need evidence to show that they really lacked the exposure.
A) If farmer are using the strategy designed by advocacy group then it weakens. eliminate
B) It talks about other groups who are kind of opposing these group does not create strong evidence that they lack exposure so little out of context hence eliminate
C) It directly supports with the evidence hence keep
D) It kind of saying that urban companies are using expert from concerned field then it doesnt strengths the reasoning.
E) It relies on other factor other than concerned reasoning for the farmers not relying on them hence irrelevant hence eliminate
SO Answer (C)
