Hi FutureForbes40U40,I see exactly where your D came from, and it's a natural read. But notice what Statement (
1) actually gives us, versus what you're adding to it.
Statement (
1) only says Larry
never needs precision finer than 1°C. That's a fact about
how fine he reads, not about
which scale he prefers or
which temperatures he needs to reach. Both thermometers can deliver
1°C precision, so on precision alone they tie. And remember - the problem already tells us user-friendliness is the same for both, so "more comfortable with Celsius" isn't a difference we're allowed to use.
The real difference between the two thermometers is range. Convert the Fahrenheit one:
32°F =
0°C and
212°F =
100°C, so it covers
0°C to 100°C. The Celsius one covers
-20°C to 100°C - it's the only one that reads
below freezing. So the question "which is better?" really hinges on one thing:
does Larry ever need below-zero readings?Why (1) can't settle it - two casesBoth obey Statement (
1) (precision no finer than
1°C), yet they disagree:
-
Case A: Larry only measures hot foods, never below
0°C - both thermometers work equally - no winner.
-
Case B: Larry sometimes measures frozen foods below
0°C - only the Celsius one reaches them - Celsius wins.
Same statement,
two different answers -
not sufficient. That's the DS rule at work.
Statement (
2) directly tells us Larry
does measure frozen foods (below
0°C), so only the Celsius thermometer works - a definite answer. That's why
(2) alone is sufficient and the answer is
B, not D.
The takeaway: in DS, a statement is only
sufficient if it forces
one answer across every allowed scenario - and precision simply doesn't pin down the range question.
Answer: BFutureForbes40U40
If Larry does not measure temperature with greater than 1°C, doesn't this mean that Larry will be more comfortable using the thermometer with the Celsius scale rather than the Fahrenheit one? I chose D because of this logic.