Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 07
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT 
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
24 Jun 2026, 19:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
53% (02:35) correct
47%
(02:47)
wrong
based on 185
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Justin: Under current state law, employers must provide worker’s compensation insurance, which provides income to employees who cannot work due to injuries sustained at the workplace, to all full-time employees. This form of insurance is vital in protecting workers from financial ruin in the event they are suddenly unable to work.
Bharti: I disagree with your assessment. The high premiums employers are forced to pay for worker’s compensation insurance force many of them out of business, thereby serving to increase the state’s unemployment rate. Since unemployed people are statistically unlikely to carry health insurance, the state-mandated worker’s compensation scheme actually renders workers more vulnerable to financial devastation in the event of bodily injury.
Which of the following, if true, should Justin cite in order to respond most effectively to Bharti’s counterargument?
(A) In addition to carrying worker’s compensation insurance, most employers in the state also provide health insurance for full-time employees.
(B) Patients without health insurance and who have no money typically receive inferior treatment at hospital emergency rooms.
(C) People are statistically more likely to sustain debilitating injuries at the workplace than elsewhere.
(D) The state agency that compensates injured workers under the current insurance scheme is financially able to pay all foreseeable claims.
(E) Many workers file fraudulent worker’s compensation claims, and state regulators often fail to detect such fraud.
Bharti: I disagree with your assessment. The high premiums employers are forced to pay for worker’s compensation insurance force many of them out of business, thereby serving to increase the state’s unemployment rate. Since unemployed people are statistically unlikely to carry health insurance, the state-mandated worker’s compensation scheme actually renders workers more vulnerable to financial devastation in the event of bodily injury.
Which of the following, if true, should Justin cite in order to respond most effectively to Bharti’s counterargument?
(A) In addition to carrying worker’s compensation insurance, most employers in the state also provide health insurance for full-time employees.
(B) Patients without health insurance and who have no money typically receive inferior treatment at hospital emergency rooms.
(C) People are statistically more likely to sustain debilitating injuries at the workplace than elsewhere.
(D) The state agency that compensates injured workers under the current insurance scheme is financially able to pay all foreseeable claims.
(E) Many workers file fraudulent worker’s compensation claims, and state regulators often fail to detect such fraud.
Updated on: 25 Jun 2026, 20:34
Originally posted by AdarshSambare on 25 Jun 2026, 02:28.
Last edited by AdarshSambare on 25 Jun 2026, 20:34, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by AdarshSambare on 25 Jun 2026, 20:34, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bharti's main argument is, if more people are unemployed, more people will be unable to buy health insurance.
Answer is C
Answer is C
25 Jun 2026, 03:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
This is actually a tricky one, a high quality buttler question.
I think option C is the closest. This can be done using POE actually.
Option A does not seem to be right because Bharti's point is the fact that they get unemployed and unemployed are less likely to have health insurance.
So A does nothing to prove her point otherwise. Putting more burden on the employer will get them out of business even more easily and then Bharti's point would potentially stand. The premise cannot be questioned in an CR, the key part being that unemployed are less likely to have health insurance.
All other options are more or less not relevant and we come upon C now.
If C is true then the conclusion that they are "more" vulnerable to proven wrong. Still not completely, but to an extent. Her point of not having health insurance would all be right but if the worst injury is actually in workplace he might not need the health insurance and weakens Bharti's point to a certain extent.
I think option C is the closest. This can be done using POE actually.
Option A does not seem to be right because Bharti's point is the fact that they get unemployed and unemployed are less likely to have health insurance.
So A does nothing to prove her point otherwise. Putting more burden on the employer will get them out of business even more easily and then Bharti's point would potentially stand. The premise cannot be questioned in an CR, the key part being that unemployed are less likely to have health insurance.
All other options are more or less not relevant and we come upon C now.
If C is true then the conclusion that they are "more" vulnerable to proven wrong. Still not completely, but to an extent. Her point of not having health insurance would all be right but if the worst injury is actually in workplace he might not need the health insurance and weakens Bharti's point to a certain extent.
AdarshSambare
