Ok this one is fun because of the units mismatch trap buried in it. Two-part Analysis loves doing this, giving you a diameter and hoping you plug it straight into the sphere volume formula without converting to radius first.
1. Volume of a sphere is (4/3)πr^3, and you're given diameters, not radii. For the 7 ft globe, r = 3.5, so r^3 = 42.875. Volume comes out to about 179.6 cubic feet.
2. Metal cost is $70 per cubic foot, so that's 179.6 × 70, roughly $12,570 just for the metal.
3. Here's the part people skip when they're rushing, there's an extra 50% tacked on for design, assembly, and labor. So the real total is 12,570 × 1.5, which lands you around $18,900, close enough to the $19,000 answer.
4. Same process for the 10 ft globe. r = 5, r^3 = 125, volume is about 523.6 cubic feet.
5. Metal cost is 523.6 × 70, around $36,650. Add the 50% markup and you get roughly $54,980, which rounds to $55,000.
I got burned by almost the exact same trap on a practice test, used the diameter as the radius and got an answer that was 8x too big (since it's cubed, that error compounds fast). If your answer choice is way off from everything listed, that's usually your first clue you mixed up r and d.
Takeaway: with sphere or cylinder volume questions, convert diameter to radius before you touch the formula, and always check whether there's a second cost layer hiding in the word problem before you lock in an answer.