Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 08:34 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 08:34
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
enginpasa1
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Last visit: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Posts: 23
Kudos: 10
 [1]
og diagnostic # 40 sentence correction 31 Jan 2008, 21:26
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
40. In 195 ROchard Stellman, a well known critic of the patent system, testified in patent office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kirchoff’s laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary physics.
a. same
b. laws, which was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and it is
c. Laws, namely, it was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and
d. Laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845, it is
e. Laws that was an observation about electric current, first made in 1845, and is

Answer is A
But what is wrong with B. The “which” refers directly to the laws. I don’t see the problem can someone explain this in the simplest terms to me please.
C. doesn’t the word NAMELY make this redundant?
d. IT IS doesn’t fit the sentence by hearing it out.


Can someone explain this in an easy manner please.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
ashkrs
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Last visit: 21 Feb 2019
Posts: 282
Own Kudos:
345
 [1]
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Posts: 282
Kudos: 345
 [1]
og diagnostic # 40 sentence correction 31 Jan 2008, 21:49
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
enginpasa1
40. In 195 ROchard Stellman, a well known critic of the patent system, testified in patent office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kirchoff’s laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary physics.
a. same
b. laws, which was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and it is
c. Laws, namely, it was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and
d. Laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845, it is
e. Laws that was an observation about electric current, first made in 1845, and is

Answer is A
But what is wrong with B. The “which” refers directly to the laws. I don’t see the problem can someone explain this in the simplest terms to me please.
C. doesn’t the word NAMELY make this redundant?
d. IT IS doesn’t fit the sentence by hearing it out.


Can someone explain this in an easy manner please.
Show more

First either underline the sentence or re-write the option A for better understanding.

Well there is an exception on usage of restrictive or non-restrictive clause when we have a pattern such as "one of X(plural)" . In such pattern non-restrictive clause "which" doesn't have clear antecedent and restrictive clause "that" refers to X(plural).
remember the SC? ( search if you haven't seen ) "Cleveland is one of the communities that are"
E is wrong because it uses singular verb "was" after "that"



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
AbhishekP220108
507 posts
bhanu29
363 posts