To prevent overcrowding, last month the town zoning board limited the

Question

To prevent overcrowding, last month the town zoning board limited the number of new buildings that can be constructed in the town in any given year. The board claims that doing so will preserve open spaces and lessen the strain on municipal resources such as schools and garbage disposal. Critics of the changes argue that the plan will harm the community or, at the very least, will fail in its purpose.

Which of the following most supports the claims of the critics of the plan?
 
(A) Other towns have had mixed success with similar zoning plans.
(B) No new schools have been built in the town in ten years.
(C) Property taxes in the town are higher than in neighboring towns.
(D) Under the new plan, developers may still erect apartment buildings.
(E) The nearest garbage dump is several miles away from the town.

IanStewart · Accepted Answer

I don't think this is a well-designed question at all, for many reasons:

* The question itself asks "Which of the following most supports the  claims  of the critics?" Well, the critics make two 'claims': that the plan will harm the community, and that the plan will fail. If we need an answer that supports the claims (plural), then that answer should help support the contention that the plan will harm the community  and  that the plan will not succeed. Answer D only supports (rather tenuously) one of those two claims.

* The critics also claim that the plan will "fail in its  purpose ". But the stem tells us that the plan has more than one 'purpose: it is meant to 'preserve open spaces', to 'lessen the strain on municipal resources', and 'to prevent overcrowding'. So if we want to support the claim that the plan will fail in 'its purpose', which purpose are we even talking about?

* And if the purpose we identify is "to preserve open spaces", I can't see how D is a good answer. Using D, we're comparing two scenarios: one scenario, where this zoning law is not passed, and developers can build anything they want, and another scenario where developers can only build apartment buildings. It seems to me that in the second scenario, open spaces are far more likely to be preserved. So D does not support the critics' claims, if we interpret the purpose of the plan to be to 'preserve open spaces'.

* This question is also set up like a 'strengthen the argument' question, but  there is no argument . We just have critics saying "the plan is bad". I see some prep company questions set up this way, but I don't think I've ever seen a real GMAT question where we need to strengthen an argument that doesn't exist.

GMATNinja · Answer

I'm with Ian on this one: while I can see why MGMAT says that D is the best answer, the question has some serious flaws. The argument is awfully mushy, and there will never be a 100% airtight answer in a case like this. If the argument isn't airtight, then neither is the answer.

Anybody who knows me is probably sick of hearing this, but I really don't think it's worth getting too bent out of shape over a verbal question from any test-prep company. It's unbelievably difficult for anybody to copy the style, precision, and nuance of real GMAT exam, especially on the verbal side. GMAC literally spends millions of dollars developing test questions, and no test-prep company can dream of matching their expertise and resources--not even Manhattan GMAT.

Think about it this way: multiply your $250 test fee by the 280,000 people who take the test every year, and then add in the score report fees, test appointment change fees, the fees school pay to spam you with email, and GMAC's income from selling test-prep materials. And then consider that GMAC is technically a non-profit that exists solely for the purpose of creating and administering this test, and most of their revenue is supposedly spent on perfecting the GMAT. Every single question undergoes an unbelievable amount of scrutiny and testing. Manhattan GMAT is an amazing company, but they simply can't match that. Some of Manhattan's questions will be imperfect. It's inevitable.

I'm not necessarily saying that you shouldn't use books from test-prep companies (depending on your weaknesses, you probably should), and I'm definitely not saying that you should avoid MGMAT materials (their materials are clearly among the best in the industry). But the vast majority of your verbal practice time should be spent on official, retired test questions... and I wouldn't lose much sleep over a slightly sloppy question from a non-official source.

I hope this helps, Carcass!

Bunuel · Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

The correct answer is D.

The plan limits the number of new buildings that can be constructed in the town in any given year. The rationale for the plan is that it will preserve open spaces and relieve the pressure on schools and other municipal resources. Critics claim that the plan will backfire or fail. We are asked to support this prediction. If the goal of the plan is to prevent overcrowding, then choice D supports the claims of the critics: apartment buildings will draw more residents to the town than would private houses and thus the plan's goals would likely be threatened.

pmenon · Answer

should be d.

if developers can still build condo buildings, then what is to stop new residents from moving in, thereby increasing population and resulting in an added strain on the citys infrastructure

hanumayamma · Answer

Board: Zoning helps in preventing overcrowding and will lessen burden on schools ect.
Critics: Plan will harm the community or at least will fail.

a) Other towns have had mixed success with similar zoning plans.  Mixed success – may not help critics – eliminate it ]

b) No new schools have been built in the town in ten years.  Yes. Schools may/may not be part of restricted number of buildings – not stated explicitly - eliminate it ]

c) Property taxes in the town are higher than in neighboring towns. Property taxes comparison is out of scope – eliminate it ]

d) Under the new plan, developers may still erect apartment buildings.  Hold it ]

e) The nearest garbage dump is several miles away from the town.  out of scope ]
 
Answer: D

plumber250 · Answer

Hi Siddarth,

Let me try and run through the answer choices for you:

To prevent overcrowding, last month the town zoning board limited the number of new buildings that can be constructed in the town in any given year. The board claims that doing so will preserve open spaces and lessen the strain on municipal resources such as schools and garbage disposal. Critics of the changes argue that the plan will harm the community or, at the very least, will fail in its purpose.

Which of the following most supports the claims of the critics of the plan?

Other towns have had mixed success with similar zoning plans.  This WEAKENS the claims of the critics. After all, if it has worked in other places, could it not work here?

No new schools have been built in the town in ten years.  This is pretty irrelevant, whilst schools are mentioned in the piece, they're not integral to the argument

Property taxes in the town are higher than in neighboring towns.  This is irrelevant, taxes are mentioned no where in the passage

Under the new plan, developers may still erect apartment buildings.  This is correct. The plan is to limit the amount of buildings, if this plan will not work - because we have an exception (apartments) then that will help the critics.

The nearest garbage dump is several miles away from the town   Again this is irrelevant, garbage dumps are mentioned, but not part of the main argument.

Carcass · Answer

With all respect, this question is ridiculous...........

from when a new building excludes the apartments.

if I have a construction company and a customer says me to build a house or an apartment this is NOT a new building ??

OR apartment building is STILL a building

from wikipedia

KarishmaB · Answer

Responding to a pm:

You cannot infer that. It is given to you. (D) tells you that even after the plan is implemented, builders can make apartment buildings. You have to take the options to be true.

What is the plan? Limit the number of new buildings to prevent overcrowding and strain on resources.
Critics say that the plan will fail in its purpose i.e. it will not be able to prevent overcrowding.

Which option, if true, will make the plan fail?
If the developers can still erect apartment buildings, overcrowding may take place.

asmba · Answer

My reason for choosing  Option D  is that it fails the purpose of the town zoning board which is "to prevent overcrowding"

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

To prevent overcrowding, last month the town zoning board limited the

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

To prevent overcrowding, last month the town zoning board limited the

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards