Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
05 Apr 2020, 05:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
Are we not missing the fact within this statement: "experts have evaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen".
There is no fact stating the no other cookware exists which is superior to the one to which Kitchen will license the use of its name. And Option A makes it clear.
There is no fact stating the no other cookware exists which is superior to the one to which Kitchen will license the use of its name. And Option A makes it clear.
23 May 2020, 17:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question Type = Assumption so let's go with the negation technique.
Conclusion to dismantle = Kitchen can collect its licensing fees without endangering its other revenues.
(A) No other line of cookware is superior to that which will carry the Kitchen name. Even if other cookware lines are superior than Kitchen, this doesn't endanger Kitchen's other revenues.
(B) Kitchen will not license the use of its name for any products other than the line of cookware. If Kitchen does license its name for other products, you'd have to infer other facts to dismantle the conclusion. So what if they use their name for other products, the stem doesn't specify if these lines will go bad.
(C) Makers of cookware will not find Kitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name is associated with a competing product. If makers of cookware find Kitchen less attractive, "the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising". This will endanger its other revenues!
(D) Consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine will be attracted to the cookware by the Kitchen name. If consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine are not attracted to Kitchen's cookware, at worst, this may endanger the revenue of cookware, although this will not endanger its OTHER revenues. C is still the top.
(E) Kitchen is one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines. If Kitchen is not one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines, this statement does nothing to compromise Kitchens other revenues.
Conclusion to dismantle = Kitchen can collect its licensing fees without endangering its other revenues.
(A) No other line of cookware is superior to that which will carry the Kitchen name. Even if other cookware lines are superior than Kitchen, this doesn't endanger Kitchen's other revenues.
(B) Kitchen will not license the use of its name for any products other than the line of cookware. If Kitchen does license its name for other products, you'd have to infer other facts to dismantle the conclusion. So what if they use their name for other products, the stem doesn't specify if these lines will go bad.
(C) Makers of cookware will not find Kitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name is associated with a competing product. If makers of cookware find Kitchen less attractive, "the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising". This will endanger its other revenues!
(D) Consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine will be attracted to the cookware by the Kitchen name. If consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine are not attracted to Kitchen's cookware, at worst, this may endanger the revenue of cookware, although this will not endanger its OTHER revenues. C is still the top.
(E) Kitchen is one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines. If Kitchen is not one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines, this statement does nothing to compromise Kitchens other revenues.
26 May 2020, 00:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
nevergiveup
A is wrong because it is repeating a fact given in the passage. It is not an assumption. Assumption is never mentioned in the passage. We are supposed to derive it logically from the Premise and conclusion.
