Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 19:36 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 19:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatcracker2010
Joined: 13 May 2010
Last visit: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
938
 [18]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 80
Kudos: 938
 [18]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
gparmar16
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Last visit: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Location: Vancouver, BC
Concentration: Strategy - Renewable Energy
Schools:Kellog, Haas, Ross, Yale
WE 1: R&D - Product Design
WE 2: EPC
Posts: 25
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ykaiim
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 517
Own Kudos:
5,990
 [4]
Given Kudos: 40
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Posts: 517
Kudos: 5,990
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhi47
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Last visit: 18 Jul 2012
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 100
Kudos: 522
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Basically this is a assumption question. So when you use the negation technique on the answer choices all the answer choices fall apart except B . So B is the correct answer.
User avatar
raviram80
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Last visit: 20 Jun 2012
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 65
Kudos: 145
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I would really appreciate if you could show how the negation technique is causing the argument to fail for choice B and not for C.

Thanks
User avatar
kraizada84
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Last visit: 19 Nov 2018
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 48
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Posts: 149
Kudos: 533
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
raviram80
Hi,

I would really appreciate if you could show how the negation technique is causing the argument to fail for choice B and not for C.

Thanks

conclusion:
financial aid enables students to achieve high GPAs by alleviating the stress related to financial concerns and freeing up students' time to study more.

The conclusion drawn in the argument above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

B. High GPAs were not the primary criterion upon which the scholarship awards were based.
--> negate: High GPAs were the primary criterion upon which the scholarship awards were based.
okay if this true then the conclusion cant be drawn it just fails.

C. Finance-related stress affects student performance in a manner similar to that of restricted study time.
-->Negate: Finance-related stress affects student performance in a manner not similar to that of restricted study time.

so it says finance related issues does affects may be less or more than restricted study time. Then also conclusion can be drawn and it properly stands.

hence B

hope this helps
User avatar
OldFritz
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Last visit: 29 Sep 2020
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 132
Kudos: 123
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 B.

In negating B, we discover that students who that were given scholarships were already high-achievers to begin with, therefore their high GPAs have less to do with having more free time than the argument wants us to believe.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
User avatar
Marcab
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 840
Own Kudos:
4,944
 [2]
Given Kudos: 221
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 840
Kudos: 4,944
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: Financial aid enables students to achieve high GPAs by alleviating the stress related to financial concerns and freeing up students' time to study more.
Now see the stimulus. It says that those students who receive financial aid TEND to maintain high GPAs. What if there tends to be a relationship between these two, i.e., financial aid and high GPAs. What if scholarships are given to those students only who tend to maintain high GPAs. By this, the above trend that was seen in the stimulus remains intact.
Hence the only answer is B.
D is also a close one and it could also have been an answer choice, unless it had not not gone too far to use CANNOT.
If there is any flaw in my reasoning, then please let me know.
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 755
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 755
Kudos: 4,506
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 B

The author assumes that there is a casual relationship between financial aid and GPA, being financial aid the cause.
In this sense, he or she assumes that it is impossible that GPA is the cause as choice B suggests.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts