Hi MBA Community,
I'm facing a challenging choice. As an international student, I've been admitted to UCLA with $120K in total (or $60K annually) and Kellogg.
My objective is to pursue a career in consulting (targeting MBB firms) with tech as a secondary option (if things don't go well with MBB recruiting) . I don't have any finance background.
Regarding my preferred location post-MBA, I'm quite flexible, though I'm intrigued by the prospect of living in New York for a while.
In terms of fit, I'm drawn to Kellogg for its culture, people, opportunities' and brand recognition as a catalysator to future career jobs in the long term. However, it's hard to ignore the significant financial difference offered by UCLA. While I don't feel a strong aversion to UCLA's culture, the connection doesn't seem as powerful. I'm trying to evalute the long term implications of the two in terms of brand awarenss, opening doors, etc. I know that in the US the brand is important, but don't know if it is worth 120K USD more.
I'd greatly appreciate any insights, particularly regarding the impact of these choices on short-term consulting recruitment in this difficult market and the long-term financial implications (strong brand and networking vs less). If there's anything else I should consider, please let me know. Thank you all!