It is currently 24 Mar 2018, 18:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was

Author Message
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 765
Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2008, 17:58
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:00) correct 50% (00:02) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was considered one of the greatest intelligence agents of all time. It is clear that if his dismissal was justified, then Hastings was either incompetent or else disloyal. Soon after the dismissal, however, it was shown that he had never been incompetent. Thus, one is forced to conclude that Hastings must have been disloyal.

Which one of the following states an assumption upon which the argument depends?

(A) Hastings’s dismissal was justified.
(B) Hastings was a high-ranking intelligence officer.
(C) The dismissal of anyone who was disloyal would be justified.
(D) Anyone whose dismissal was justified was disloyal.
(E) If someone was disloyal or incompetent, then his dismissal was justified.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 309
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2008, 18:15
hanumayamma wrote:
Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was considered one of the greatest intelligence agents of all time. It is clear that if his dismissal was justified, then Hastings was either incompetent or else disloyal. Soon after the dismissal, however, it was shown that he had never been incompetent. Thus, one is forced to conclude that Hastings must have been disloyal.
IMO C

Which one of the following states an assumption upon which the argument depends?

(A) Hastings’s dismissal was justified.
(B) Hastings was a high-ranking intelligence officer.
(C) The dismissal of anyone who was disloyal would be justified.
(D) Anyone whose dismissal was justified was disloyal.
(E) If someone was disloyal or incompetent, then his dismissal was justified.

Premise: If A (dismissed) then B (incompetent) or C (disloyal)
Conclusion: If not B then C

The assumption should then be if C than A
Only A and C have this reasoning. However, A is mentioned in the passage so IMO C

Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 169
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2008, 18:17
Confused between C and E. Will go with C though.
Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 44
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2008, 19:03
1
KUDOS
hanumayamma wrote:
Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was considered one of the greatest intelligence agents of all time. It is clear that if his dismissal was justified, then Hastings was either incompetent or else disloyal. Soon after the dismissal, however, it was shown that he had never been incompetent. Thus, one is forced to conclude that Hastings must have been disloyal.

Which one of the following states an assumption upon which the argument depends?

(A) Hastings’s dismissal was justified.
(B) Hastings was a high-ranking intelligence officer.
(C) The dismissal of anyone who was disloyal would be justified.
(D) Anyone whose dismissal was justified was disloyal.
(E) If someone was disloyal or incompetent, then his dismissal was justified.

My confusion is between A and C. However I shall go with A.
The passage clearly says "if his dismissal was justified, then Hastings was either incompetent or else disloyal" ...inshort it states that if someone was dismissed, then they would be either incompetent or disloyal....Later passage concludes that hastings must have been disloyal because he was not incompetent
All this rests on the assumption that Hasting's dismissal was justified.

What is OA ?
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 150
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2008, 19:51
What about E..I like E better
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 765
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 13:22
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 401
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 20:05
hanumayamma wrote:
Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was considered one of the greatest intelligence agents of all time. It is clear that if his dismissal was justified, then Hastings was either incompetent or else disloyal. Soon after the dismissal, however, it was shown that he had never been incompetent. Thus, one is forced to conclude that Hastings must have been disloyal.

Which one of the following states an assumption upon which the argument depends?

(A) Hastings’s dismissal was justified.
(B) Hastings was a high-ranking intelligence officer.
(C) The dismissal of anyone who was disloyal would be justified.
(D) Anyone whose dismissal was justified was disloyal.
(E) If someone was disloyal or incompetent, then his dismissal was justified.

IMO A)
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 150
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 06:44
hanumayamma wrote:

please post OE ? I did not get it.
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1366
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 07:05
It is clear that if his dismissal was justified, then Hastings was either incompetent or else disloyal.

Look at the if in the first part of the sentence. it does not establish that H's disimissal was justified. So its not stated in the stimulus that H's dismissal was justified.

Thus, one is forced to conclude that Hastings must have been disloyal.

Conclusion says that H must have been disloyal. For H to be disloyal and NOT incompetent, his dismissal must be justified.

Apply the negation test H's dismissal is not justified, which in turn means that he cannot be disloyal. Conclusion falls apart.

C D E all use generic answers. I am not sure we can use generic answers, when we have a clear subject in the stimulus. Can some one talk about this?

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Re: Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2008, 07:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Until he was dismissed amid great controversy, Hastings was

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.