GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Jun 2018, 23:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Until recently many astronomers believed that asteroids

Author Message
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 826
Until recently many astronomers believed that asteroids [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2009, 08:21
Until recently many astronomers believed that asteroids travel about the solar system unaccompanied by satellites. These astronomers assumed this because they considered asteroid-satellite systems inherently unstable. Theoreticians could have told them otherwise: even minuscule bodies in the solar system can theoretically have satellites, as long as everything is in proper scale. If a bowling ball were orbiting about the Sun in the asteroid belt, it could have a pebble orbiting it as far away as a few hundred radii (or about 50 meters) without losing the pebble to the Sun’s gravitational pull.

Observations now suggest that asteroid satellites may exists not only in theory but also in reality. Several astronomers have noticed, while watching asteroids pass briefly in front of stars, that something besides the known asteroid sometimes blocks out the star as well. Is that something a satellite?

The most convincing such report concerns the asteroid Herculina, which was due to pass in front of a star in 1978. Astronomers waiting for the predicted event found not just one occultation, or eclipse, of the star, but two distinct drops in brightness. One was the predicted occultation, exactly on time. The other, lasting about five seconds, preceded the predicted event by about two minutes. The presence of a secondary body near Herculina thus seemed strongly indicated. To cause the secondary occultation, an unseen satellite would have to be about 45 kilometers in diameter, a quarter of the size of Herculina, and at a distance of 990 kilometers from the asteroid at the time. These values are within theoretical bounds, and such an asteroid-satellite pair could be stable.

With the Herculina event, apparent secondary occultations became “respectable”—and more commonly reported. In fact, so common did reports of secondary events become that they are now simply too numerous for all of them to be accurate. Even if every asteroid has as many satellites as can be fitted around it without an undue number of collisions, only one in every hundred primary occultations would be accompanied by a secondary event (one in every thousand if asteroid satellites system resembled those of the planets).

Yet even astronomers who find the case for asteroid satellites unconvincing at present say they would change their minds if a photoelectric record were made of a well-behaved secondary event. By “well-behaved” they mean that during occultation the observed brightness must drop sharply as the star winks out and must rise sharply as it reappears from behind the obstructing object, but the brightness during the secondary occultation must drop to that of the asteroid, no higher and no lower. This would make it extremely unlikely that an airplane or a glitch in the instruments was masquerading as an occulting body.

1. Which one of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?

(A) The observation of Herculina represented the crucial event that astronomical observers and theoreticians had been waiting for to establish a convincing case for the stability of asteroid-satellite systems.
(B) Although astronomers long believed that observation supports the existence of stable asteroid-satellite systems, numerous recent reports have increased skepticism on this issue in astronomy.
(C) Theoreticians’ views on the stability of asteroid-satellite systems may be revised in the light of reports like those about Herculina.
(D) Astronomers continue to consider it respectable to doubt the stability of asteroid-satellite systems, but new theoretical developments may change their views.
(E) The Herculina event suggests that theoreticians’ views about asteroid-satellite systems may be correct, and astronomers agree about the kind of evidence needed to clearly resolve the issue.

2. Which one of the following is mentioned in the passage as providing evidence that Herculina has a satellite?

(A) the diameter of a body directly observed near Herculina
(B) the distance between Herculina and planet nearest to it
(C) the shortest possible time in which satellites of Herculina, if any, could complete a single orbit
(D) the occultation that occurred shortly before the predicted occultation by Herculina
(E) the precise extent to which observed brightness dropped during the occultation by Herculina

3. According to the passage, the attitude of astronomers toward asteroid satellites since the Herculina event can best described as

(A) open-mindedness combined with a concern for rigorous standards of proof
(B) contempt for and impatience with the position held by theoreticians
(C) bemusement at a chaotic mix of theory, inadequate or spurious data, and calls for scientific rigor
(D) hardheaded skepticism, implying rejection of all data not recorded automatically by state-of-the-art instruments
(E) admiration for the methodical process by which science progresses from initial hypothesis to incontrovertible proof

4. The author implies that which one of the following was true prior to reports of the Herculina event?

(A) Since no good theoretical model existed, all claims that reports of secondary occultations were common were disputed.
(B) Some of the reported observations of secondary occultations were actually observations of collisions of satellites with one another.
(C) If there were observations of phenomena exactly like the phenomena now labeled secondary occultations, astronomers were less likely than to have reported such observations.
(D) The prevailing standards concerning what to classify as a well-behaved secondary event were less stringent than they are now.
(E) Astronomers were eager to publish their observations of occultations of stars by satellites of asteroids.

5. The information presented in the passage implies which one of the following about the frequency of reports of secondary occultations after the Herculina event?

(A) The percentage of reports of primary occultations that also included reports of secondary occultations increased tenfold compared to the time before the Herculina event.
(B) Primary occultations by asteroids were reported to have been accompanied by secondary occultations in about one out of every thousand cases.
(C) The absolute number of reports of secondary occultations increased tenfold compared to the time before the Herculina event.
(D) Primary occultations by asteroids were reported to have been accompanied by secondary occultations in more than one out of every hundred cases.
(E) In more than one out of every hundred cases, primary occultations were reported to have been accompanied by more than one secondary occultation.

6. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) cast doubts on existing reports of secondary occultations of stars
(B) describe experimental efforts by astronomers to separate theoretically believable observations of satellites of asteroids from spurious ones
(C) review the development of ideas among astronomers about whether or not satellites of asteroids exist
(D) bring a theoretician’s perspective to bear on an incomplete discussion of satellites of asteroids
(E) illustrate the limits of reasonable speculation concerning the occultation of stars

7. The passage suggests that which one of the following would most help to resolve the question of whether asteroids have satellites?

(A) a review of pre-1978 reports of secondary occultations
(B) an improved theoretical model of stable satellite systems
(C) a photoelectric record of a well-behaved secondary occultation
(D) a more stringent definition of what constitutes a well-behaved secondary occultation
(E) a powerful telescope that would permit a comparison of ground-based observation with those made from airplanes
=============LSAT===========

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1340
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2009, 17:16
E D A C D C C

1 and 6 were tricky.

5 does a play on words, but changes meaning
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1181
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2009, 23:05
I tuk 10 minutes.

A D A C D C C
Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 830
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 04:29
E D A B B D D?
May be I need to improve?? What are the OAs?
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 826
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 07:01
Too tired but tried to complete the daily Quota of 3 RCs
well, I took 24 mins
1 E/D(was confused)
2 D
3 D
4 E
5 E
6 B
7 C
Passage was good
but not sure abt result
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 826
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 07:04
OAs are EDAC DCC
nitya34 wrote:
Too tired but tried to complete the daily Quota of 3 RCs
well, I took 24 mins
1 E/D(was confused)
2 D
3 D
4 E
5 E
6 B
7 C
Passage was good
but not sure abt result

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Intern
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 09:35
E
D
A
C
D
B
C

For 6) i thought that idea of existence of satellites was already there and only evidence were produced...so i guessed B or E....

Where did i go wrong?
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1181
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 10:16
icandy, can u pls explain the first question?
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1340
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 14:28
ritula wrote:
icandy, can u pls explain the first question?

I really had a tough time with this Q. I have an issue with E even though I picked it

Also, I am not getting any answer when I expect an explanation on Q I got wrong

1. Which one of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?

(A) The observation of Herculina represented the crucial event that astronomical observers and theoreticians had been waiting for to establish a convincing case for the stability of asteroid-satellite systems.
(B) Although astronomers long believed that observation supports the existence of stable asteroid-satellite systems, numerous recent reports have increased skepticism on this issue in astronomy.
(C) Theoreticians’ views on the stability of asteroid-satellite systems may be revised in the light of reports like those about Herculina.
(D) Astronomers continue to consider it respectable to doubt the stability of asteroid-satellite systems, but new theoretical developments may change their views.
(E) The Herculina event suggests that theoreticians’ views about asteroid-satellite systems may be correct, and astronomers agree about the kind of evidence needed to clearly resolve the issue.

Clearly B & C are out of sync with the message in the passage

Now Look at A and the red part. T's already said what they have to say. Not establishing any thing new. Hence out

I was torn between D & E.

In the last para, Astronomers still find it unconvincing, So the first part of D is ok. What causes it to lose is the 2nd part. If A were to change their view, it would be based on solid evidence. So D is wrong

The issue with D is 1st part is good. 2nd part it says astronomers agree about the kind of evidence??But with who?? Is it implied that they agree with T?? I could not find any where in the passage. Any way's i felt that E was the lesser of the evil and chose E.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 343
Location: India
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 16:25
icandy perfect again

For the records I took 18 mins and got 4 correct

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 234
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2009, 04:27
icandy,

pls explain 4.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Re: Long RC 1-Astronomy(Until recently many)-Monday   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2009, 04:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Until recently many astronomers believed that asteroids

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.