Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 21:37 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 21:37
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vyassaptarashi
User avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Last visit: 20 Jan 2018
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
370
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 101
Kudos: 370
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting 01 Oct 2011, 08:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

79% (01:23) correct 21% (01:38) wrong based on 28 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act in 1982, a first-time
charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge, federal prosecutors
being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were subject to
relatively small penalties.
A. charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright
infringers, while offenders were
B. charge, with federal prosecutors who were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright
infringers, offenders being
C. charge, federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, while
offenders were
D. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely in pursuing criminal
copyright infringers and offenders being
E. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright
infringers, and offenders were



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
User avatar
bagrettin
User avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2011
Last visit: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
265
 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United States
Schools: Erasmus (S)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.9
Schools: Erasmus (S)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
Posts: 58
Kudos: 265
 [1]
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting 01 Oct 2011, 09:04
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since two part of the sentence are not directly connected, you should divide them with a semicolon. Remember that GMAT does not like "being" and the infinitiv is better that "-ing" form, so (E) is the right choice.
User avatar
mydreammba
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 06 Dec 2013
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
1,677
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 224
Kudos: 1,677
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting 01 Oct 2011, 19:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 E

Parallelism as "x were" and "Y were"
User avatar
jamifahad
User avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Last visit: 14 Mar 2015
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
1,733
Given Kudos: 22
Schools: Simon '16 (M$)
Schools: Simon '16 (M$)
Posts: 256
Kudos: 1,733
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting 02 Oct 2011, 06:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vyassaptarashi
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act in 1982, a first-time
charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge, federal prosecutors
being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were subject to
relatively small penalties.
A. charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright
infringers, while offenders were
B. charge, with federal prosecutors who were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright
infringers, offenders being
C. charge, federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, while
offenders were
D. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely in pursuing criminal
copyright infringers and offenders being
E. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright
infringers, and offenders were
Show more

E.
One of the reasons we use semicolon is to show cause and effect relationship.
In the question, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers because the charge was merely a misdemeanor. This relationship is quite aptly conveyed by a semicolon.
avatar
rajivchandak
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Last visit: 24 Dec 2011
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Status:Applying in Round 2
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
Schools: Stern '14
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Schools: Stern '14
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 8
Kudos: 12
 [1]
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting 03 Oct 2011, 03:40
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Clearly E, since we need a coonector such as "Therefore" to connect the two sentence, so only D and E remains. E is better worded and avoids being so that is the answer
User avatar
immaculatesahai
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Last visit: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
99
Given Kudos: 12
GPA: 8.03
Posts: 44
Kudos: 99
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting 28 Oct 2011, 22:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vyassaptarashi
Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act in 1982, a first-time
charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge, federal prosecutors
being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were subject to
relatively small penalties.
A. charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright
infringers, while offenders were
B. charge, with federal prosecutors who were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright
infringers, offenders being
C. charge, federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, while
offenders were
D. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely in pursuing criminal
copyright infringers and offenders being
E. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright
infringers, and offenders were
Show more


+1 for E. Both independent clauses. Semi colon correctly prevents run on. infinitive used instead of participle.
E wins.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
495 posts
bhanu29
358 posts