Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products. Ends 6/1
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- May 19
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep.... - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
lemonmelon
Current Student
Joined: 06 Mar 2017
Last visit: 27 Jan 2022
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Schools: Johnson '24 (A$)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
Products:
12 Aug 2020, 22:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
I am familiar with the concept that statements of factual nature, or statements that express just a general state-of-being, are typically (most of the time) written in simple present tense. However, is this an iron-clad rule or are there any exceptions?
I came across a VeritasPrep question in which the question prompt compares philosophies of two people in the past. Two possible constructions:
(i) "philosophy of person A IS different from that of B" --> rationale that philosophies still exist, or
(ii) "philosophy of person A WAS different from that of B" --> one could argue that philosophies were introduced in the past
I am inclined towards option (i), but curious if (ii) could be correct in other similar scenarios?
Thanks,
I came across a VeritasPrep question in which the question prompt compares philosophies of two people in the past. Two possible constructions:
(i) "philosophy of person A IS different from that of B" --> rationale that philosophies still exist, or
(ii) "philosophy of person A WAS different from that of B" --> one could argue that philosophies were introduced in the past
I am inclined towards option (i), but curious if (ii) could be correct in other similar scenarios?
Thanks,
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
575 posts
11 posts
