Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
16 Sep 2014, 02:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry, while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.
A. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them
B. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be
C. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them as
D. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work
E. of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be
A. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them
B. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be
C. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them as
D. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work
E. of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be
16 Sep 2014, 02:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry, while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.
A. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them
B. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be
C. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them as
D. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work
E. of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be
A. The pronoun “them” is used two times, referring to a different antecedent each time. Such usage is fundamentally wrong. If the same pronoun is used multiple times in a sentence, it should refer to the same antecedent.
Moreover, each time the antecedent is unclear. For the first “them”, the antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence. For the second “them”, the antecedent should be “relaxations”, but there are other plural nouns in the sentence ( e.g., “production houses”) that qualify to be the antecedent.
Plural noun “allow” is wrongly used with the singular subject “ Board”.
B. The idiom “consider X to be Y” is wrong. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
The pronoun “them” is ambiguous. The antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence.
C. The pronoun “them” is used two times, referring to a different antecedent each time. Such usage is fundamentally wrong. If the same pronoun is used multiple times in a sentence, it should refer to the same antecedent.
Moreover, each time the antecedent is unclear. For the first “them”, the antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence. For the second “them”, the antecedent should be “relaxations”, but there are other plural nouns in the sentence ( e.g., “production houses”) that qualify to be the antecedent.
Plural noun “allow” is wrongly used with the singular subject “ Board”.
The idiom “consider X as Y” is wrong. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
D. CORRECT. The idiom “consider X Y” is correct. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
The correct parallelism format is maintained:
Proponents consider relaxations (+ modifier) vital, while critics denounce the relaxations.
The singular subject “Board” uses the singular verb “allows”.
E. The idiom “consider X to be Y” is wrong. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
The pronoun “them” is ambiguous. The antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence.
Answer: D
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry, while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.
A. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them
B. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be
C. of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them as
D. consider relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work
E. of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be
A. The pronoun “them” is used two times, referring to a different antecedent each time. Such usage is fundamentally wrong. If the same pronoun is used multiple times in a sentence, it should refer to the same antecedent.
Moreover, each time the antecedent is unclear. For the first “them”, the antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence. For the second “them”, the antecedent should be “relaxations”, but there are other plural nouns in the sentence ( e.g., “production houses”) that qualify to be the antecedent.
Plural noun “allow” is wrongly used with the singular subject “ Board”.
B. The idiom “consider X to be Y” is wrong. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
The pronoun “them” is ambiguous. The antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence.
C. The pronoun “them” is used two times, referring to a different antecedent each time. Such usage is fundamentally wrong. If the same pronoun is used multiple times in a sentence, it should refer to the same antecedent.
Moreover, each time the antecedent is unclear. For the first “them”, the antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence. For the second “them”, the antecedent should be “relaxations”, but there are other plural nouns in the sentence ( e.g., “production houses”) that qualify to be the antecedent.
Plural noun “allow” is wrongly used with the singular subject “ Board”.
The idiom “consider X as Y” is wrong. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
D. CORRECT. The idiom “consider X Y” is correct. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
The correct parallelism format is maintained:
Proponents consider relaxations (+ modifier) vital, while critics denounce the relaxations.
The singular subject “Board” uses the singular verb “allows”.
E. The idiom “consider X to be Y” is wrong. (Here X = relaxations, Y = vital)
The pronoun “them” is ambiguous. The antecedent should be “producers”, the noun which is missing entirely from the sentence.
Answer: D
10 Apr 2022, 03:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
The question or/and solution has been revised and edited. Thank you sayantanc2k !!!
