Bunuel
Tests conducted by National Automobile Association of India (NAAI) have revealed that the vacuum brakes fixed on Nano mini-cars perform better than any brake fixed on any other mini-car in each of the test scenarios. Thus, any consumer who is purchasing a mini-car solely on the basis of safety should purchase a Nano.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A. Mini-cars are less safe than some other types of automobiles.
B. Most consumers purchase cars based on multiple criteria in addition to safety.
C. Some of the scenarios in the tests conducted by NAAI are rarely confronted during ordinary city driving.
D. The vacuum brakes on Nano mini-cars are costlier to maintain than those of other mini-cars.
E. Some other mini-cars achieved a better frontal-collision safety rating than the Nano mini-cars.
Maybe I am missing some vital point, if somebody can help, then that would be great.
Basically we have to prove that if somebody is making decision based on safety then he/she should go for Nano. To weaken that I have to say don't if you are only considering safety.
One way to say is that the safety tests which prove that it is very safe are not real test, hence not safe. This is said by C and E says in frontal collision, which is one of the many test cases some cars perform better and that is why don't buy Nano.
I am definitely not seeing in the same line as everybody is...Can somebody help here!
Thanks in Advance!