Official Solution:As if this vast local power in the tendinous tail was not enough, the whole bulk of the leviathan is knit over with a warp and woof of muscular fibres and filaments, and while passing on either side of the loins and running down into the flukes, insensibly blend with them and largely contribute to their might.A. was not enough, the whole bulk of the leviathan is knit over with a warp and woof of muscular fibres and filaments, and while passing on either side of the loins and running
B. were not enough, the whole bulk of the leviathan is knit over with a warp and woof of muscular fibres and filaments, which, passing on either side of the loins and running
C. was not enough, the whole bulk of the leviathan is knit over with a warp and woof of muscular fibres and filaments, while they pass on either side of the loins, run
D. was not enough, the whole bulk of the leviathan is knit over with a warp and woof of muscular fibres and filaments, which pass on either side of the loins and run
E. were not enough, the whole bulk of the leviathan is knit over with a warp and woof of muscular fibres and filaments, pass on either side of the loins and while running
A. The verb
was is wrong in hypothetical subjunctive. The sentence implies that the whole bulk of the leviathan, while passing on either side of the loins and running down the fluke, blends and contributes, whereas the correct meaning is that the muscular fibres and filaments do so. Grammatically, the singular subject
the whole bulk of the leviathan does not agree with the verbs
blend and
contribute.
B. CORRECT. The verb were is correctly used in hypothetical subjunctive. The meaning is correctly conveyed by introducing a subordinate clause with
which, referring to
the muscular fibres and filaments. The muscular fibres and filaments, passing on either side the loins and running down into the flukes, insensibly blend with them and largely contribute to their might.
C. The verb
was is wrong in hypothetical subjunctive. The pronoun
they is ambiguous, having 2 different antecedents.
D. The verb
was is wrong in hypothetical subjunctive. Moreover while using 4 verbs,
pass, run, blend and
contribute, in parallel, the first two verbs are incorrectly separated by
and.
E. The sentence implies that the whole bulk of the leviathan passes on either side of the loins and while running down the flukes, blend and contribute. However the correct meaning is that the muscular fibres and filaments do so. Gramatically, the singular subject
the whole bulk of the leviathan does not agree with the verbs
blend and
contribute.
Answer: B