|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
14 Sep 2024, 22:04
Kudos
Bookmarks
A price ceiling is a government or group-imposed price control or limit on how high a price can be charged for a product, commodity, or service. Governments use price ceilings to protect consumers from conditions that could make commodities prohibitively expensive. Such conditions can occur during periods of high inflation, in the event of an investment bubble, or in the case of monopoly ownership of a product.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
Each of the following describes a problem with price ceilings EXCEPT:
A. Suppliers may collude to charge prices at or near the maximum limit, resulting in artificially high prices.
B. The quantity of goods supplied may decrease as suppliers lose the incentive to produce more.
C. Consumers may struggle to find affordable goods as suppliers withdraw from the market due to financial unviability.
D. Landlords may convert rentable properties into sellable properties, reducing the availability of rental housing.
E. Price ceilings lead to increased competition among suppliers, lowering prices significantly below the ceiling.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
Each of the following describes a problem with price ceilings EXCEPT:
A. Suppliers may collude to charge prices at or near the maximum limit, resulting in artificially high prices.
B. The quantity of goods supplied may decrease as suppliers lose the incentive to produce more.
C. Consumers may struggle to find affordable goods as suppliers withdraw from the market due to financial unviability.
D. Landlords may convert rentable properties into sellable properties, reducing the availability of rental housing.
E. Price ceilings lead to increased competition among suppliers, lowering prices significantly below the ceiling.
14 Sep 2024, 22:04
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
A price ceiling is a government or group-imposed price control or limit on how high a price can be charged for a product, commodity, or service. Governments use price ceilings to protect consumers from conditions that could make commodities prohibitively expensive. Such conditions can occur during periods of high inflation, in the event of an investment bubble, or in the case of monopoly ownership of a product.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
Each of the following describes a problem with price ceilings EXCEPT:
A. Suppliers may collude to charge prices at or near the maximum limit, resulting in artificially high prices.
B. The quantity of goods supplied may decrease as suppliers lose the incentive to produce more.
C. Consumers may struggle to find affordable goods as suppliers withdraw from the market due to financial unviability.
D. Landlords may convert rentable properties into sellable properties, reducing the availability of rental housing.
E. Price ceilings lead to increased competition among suppliers, lowering prices significantly below the ceiling.
A. Incorrect. Option A describes a common issue with price ceilings. When firms collude around the ceiling price, they often maintain artificially high prices, which defeats the purpose of the price control. This is a problem with price ceilings.
B. Incorrect. Price ceilings can reduce profitability, leading suppliers to cut production, which reduces the quantity of goods available in the market. This is a problem with price ceilings.
C. Incorrect. When price ceilings make markets financially unviable for suppliers, they may reduce supply or withdraw, making it harder for consumers to find goods even if prices are controlled. This is a problem with price celings.
D. Incorrect. The passage discusses how rent controls, a form of price ceiling, can reduce the supply of rental housing as landlords find selling more profitable than renting under price controls. This is a problem with price ceilings.
E. Correct Answer. Option E describes a situation where price ceilings increase competition and lead to lower prices, which is contrary to the problems typically associated with price ceilings. Price ceilings generally restrict competition and may lead to higher prices through collusion. Thus this situation is not a problem associated with price ceilings.
Answer: E
A price ceiling is a government or group-imposed price control or limit on how high a price can be charged for a product, commodity, or service. Governments use price ceilings to protect consumers from conditions that could make commodities prohibitively expensive. Such conditions can occur during periods of high inflation, in the event of an investment bubble, or in the case of monopoly ownership of a product.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
Each of the following describes a problem with price ceilings EXCEPT:
A. Suppliers may collude to charge prices at or near the maximum limit, resulting in artificially high prices.
B. The quantity of goods supplied may decrease as suppliers lose the incentive to produce more.
C. Consumers may struggle to find affordable goods as suppliers withdraw from the market due to financial unviability.
D. Landlords may convert rentable properties into sellable properties, reducing the availability of rental housing.
E. Price ceilings lead to increased competition among suppliers, lowering prices significantly below the ceiling.
A. Incorrect. Option A describes a common issue with price ceilings. When firms collude around the ceiling price, they often maintain artificially high prices, which defeats the purpose of the price control. This is a problem with price ceilings.
B. Incorrect. Price ceilings can reduce profitability, leading suppliers to cut production, which reduces the quantity of goods available in the market. This is a problem with price ceilings.
C. Incorrect. When price ceilings make markets financially unviable for suppliers, they may reduce supply or withdraw, making it harder for consumers to find goods even if prices are controlled. This is a problem with price celings.
D. Incorrect. The passage discusses how rent controls, a form of price ceiling, can reduce the supply of rental housing as landlords find selling more profitable than renting under price controls. This is a problem with price ceilings.
E. Correct Answer. Option E describes a situation where price ceilings increase competition and lead to lower prices, which is contrary to the problems typically associated with price ceilings. Price ceilings generally restrict competition and may lead to higher prices through collusion. Thus this situation is not a problem associated with price ceilings.
Answer: E
28 Oct 2024, 03:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. The passage clearly states this is a challenge with ceiling
