Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
29 Sep 2024, 13:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
In 1946, US President Harry Truman signed into law the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, which established what is now called the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). The NSLP reimburses states for providing free and low-cost meals to qualifying students. In its first year, about 7 million children participated, rising to over 30 million by 2016. Schools may only serve free or reduced-price lunches to children who qualify, based on household income and family size. Currently, children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the federal poverty level qualify for free lunch, while those from families with incomes between 130 and 185 percent qualify for reduced-price lunch.
Unfortunately, the eligibility guidelines leave many children in a difficult situation: their parents earn more than 130 percent of the federal poverty level but not enough to consistently afford full or reduced-price meals. This gap often results in school lunch debt, which can have acute psychological impacts on children, including stigma and bullying from peers. For many children, these school meals are often their only reliable source of daily nutrition.
Eight states have established universal school meal programs for schools participating in the NSLP. Other states have eliminated the reduced-price lunch category, making meals free for any student from a family with an income below 185 percent of the federal poverty level. However, most states have not adopted such expanded programs, leaving millions of children without consistent access to school meals.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the role of household income in determining the eligibility for reduced-price and free school lunches.
B. To describe the growth of the National School Lunch Program from 1946 to 2016 and its expansion across states.
C. To discuss the limitations in the eligibility criteria of the National School Lunch Program and examine how states have addressed these gaps.
D. To analyze the effectiveness of state-level school meal programs in comparison to the federal National School Lunch Program.
E. To emphasize the importance of nutrition in childhood development as it relates to school meal programs.
Unfortunately, the eligibility guidelines leave many children in a difficult situation: their parents earn more than 130 percent of the federal poverty level but not enough to consistently afford full or reduced-price meals. This gap often results in school lunch debt, which can have acute psychological impacts on children, including stigma and bullying from peers. For many children, these school meals are often their only reliable source of daily nutrition.
Eight states have established universal school meal programs for schools participating in the NSLP. Other states have eliminated the reduced-price lunch category, making meals free for any student from a family with an income below 185 percent of the federal poverty level. However, most states have not adopted such expanded programs, leaving millions of children without consistent access to school meals.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the role of household income in determining the eligibility for reduced-price and free school lunches.
B. To describe the growth of the National School Lunch Program from 1946 to 2016 and its expansion across states.
C. To discuss the limitations in the eligibility criteria of the National School Lunch Program and examine how states have addressed these gaps.
D. To analyze the effectiveness of state-level school meal programs in comparison to the federal National School Lunch Program.
E. To emphasize the importance of nutrition in childhood development as it relates to school meal programs.
29 Sep 2024, 13:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
In 1946, US President Harry Truman signed into law the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, which established what is now called the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). The NSLP reimburses states for providing free and low-cost meals to qualifying students. In its first year, about 7 million children participated, rising to over 30 million by 2016. Schools may only serve free or reduced-price lunches to children who qualify, based on household income and family size. Currently, children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the federal poverty level qualify for free lunch, while those from families with incomes between 130 and 185 percent qualify for reduced-price lunch.
Unfortunately, the eligibility guidelines leave many children in a difficult situation: their parents earn more than 130 percent of the federal poverty level but not enough to consistently afford full or reduced-price meals. This gap often results in school lunch debt, which can have acute psychological impacts on children, including stigma and bullying from peers. For many children, these school meals are often their only reliable source of daily nutrition.
Eight states have established universal school meal programs for schools participating in the NSLP. Other states have eliminated the reduced-price lunch category, making meals free for any student from a family with an income below 185 percent of the federal poverty level. However, most states have not adopted such expanded programs, leaving millions of children without consistent access to school meals.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the role of household income in determining the eligibility for reduced-price and free school lunches.
B. To describe the growth of the National School Lunch Program from 1946 to 2016 and its expansion across states.
C. To discuss the limitations in the eligibility criteria of the National School Lunch Program and examine how states have addressed these gaps.
D. To analyze the effectiveness of state-level school meal programs in comparison to the federal National School Lunch Program.
E. To emphasize the importance of nutrition in childhood development as it relates to school meal programs.
A. Incorrect. While household income is mentioned as a factor in determining eligibility, the passage focuses more on the gaps in the eligibility system and less on highlighting income as a factor.
B. Incorrect. Though the passage mentions the growth of the program briefly, this is background information, not the main purpose of the passage.
[color=#339966;]C. Correct Answer.[/color] The passage’s main point is to discuss the limitations of the eligibility criteria for the National School Lunch Program and how some states have responded to these issues, which makes this the most accurate description of the passage’s purpose.
D. Incorrect. The passage mentions state-level initiatives but does not focus on analyzing their effectiveness in comparison to the federal program.
E. Incorrect. Although nutrition is important in the context of school meals, the passage’s main focus is on access and eligibility rather than on the importance of nutrition for childhood development.
Answer: C
In 1946, US President Harry Truman signed into law the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, which established what is now called the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). The NSLP reimburses states for providing free and low-cost meals to qualifying students. In its first year, about 7 million children participated, rising to over 30 million by 2016. Schools may only serve free or reduced-price lunches to children who qualify, based on household income and family size. Currently, children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the federal poverty level qualify for free lunch, while those from families with incomes between 130 and 185 percent qualify for reduced-price lunch.
Unfortunately, the eligibility guidelines leave many children in a difficult situation: their parents earn more than 130 percent of the federal poverty level but not enough to consistently afford full or reduced-price meals. This gap often results in school lunch debt, which can have acute psychological impacts on children, including stigma and bullying from peers. For many children, these school meals are often their only reliable source of daily nutrition.
Eight states have established universal school meal programs for schools participating in the NSLP. Other states have eliminated the reduced-price lunch category, making meals free for any student from a family with an income below 185 percent of the federal poverty level. However, most states have not adopted such expanded programs, leaving millions of children without consistent access to school meals.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the role of household income in determining the eligibility for reduced-price and free school lunches.
B. To describe the growth of the National School Lunch Program from 1946 to 2016 and its expansion across states.
C. To discuss the limitations in the eligibility criteria of the National School Lunch Program and examine how states have addressed these gaps.
D. To analyze the effectiveness of state-level school meal programs in comparison to the federal National School Lunch Program.
E. To emphasize the importance of nutrition in childhood development as it relates to school meal programs.
A. Incorrect. While household income is mentioned as a factor in determining eligibility, the passage focuses more on the gaps in the eligibility system and less on highlighting income as a factor.
B. Incorrect. Though the passage mentions the growth of the program briefly, this is background information, not the main purpose of the passage.
[color=#339966;]C. Correct Answer.[/color] The passage’s main point is to discuss the limitations of the eligibility criteria for the National School Lunch Program and how some states have responded to these issues, which makes this the most accurate description of the passage’s purpose.
D. Incorrect. The passage mentions state-level initiatives but does not focus on analyzing their effectiveness in comparison to the federal program.
E. Incorrect. Although nutrition is important in the context of school meals, the passage’s main focus is on access and eligibility rather than on the importance of nutrition for childhood development.
Answer: C
