Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
05 Oct 2024, 21:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Recent breakthroughs in molecular biology, particularly through the development of CRISPR-Cas9, have revolutionized the field of genetic engineering. CRISPR-Cas9, derived from a bacterial immune mechanism, allows precise manipulation of DNA, enabling targeted gene deletions, insertions, or replacements with far greater simplicity and efficiency than previous technologies such as zinc finger nucleases and TALENs. Its introduction has been heralded as a transformative leap forward in gene editing, accelerating research in genetics, medicine, and agriculture.
However, while many researchers view CRISPR-Cas9 as a tool of unparalleled promise, others express caution, noting its potential for misuse and unintended consequences. Proponents argue that the ability to edit genes in model organisms such as fruit flies and mice has already advanced the understanding of numerous genetic conditions, paving the way for breakthroughs in therapeutic interventions, including the correction of genetic disorders in humans. They emphasize that CRISPR-Cas9's versatility across a wide range of organisms could lead to innovations in crop engineering, disease resistance, and even climate adaptation strategies.
Critics, however, caution that the technology’s power comes with profound ethical dilemmas. The ability to edit human embryos, for example, raises fears of “designer babies” and unintended social inequalities. Moreover, the long-term ecological effects of altering the genomes of species within complex ecosystems remain poorly understood. Some argue that the rush to apply CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture and medicine has outpaced the necessary ethical frameworks, with policymakers struggling to catch up.
Central to this debate is the question of whether the potential benefits of CRISPR-Cas9 outweigh its risks. Advocates of regulation believe that stringent guidelines are essential to prevent misuse, but others contend that such restrictions might stifle scientific progress. Some even posit that delaying the full deployment of CRISPR-Cas9 could hinder advances that might address pressing global challenges, such as food security and genetic diseases.
Ultimately, the future of CRISPR-Cas9—and genetic engineering more broadly—depends on striking a balance between innovation and caution. As this technology continues to evolve, scientists, ethicists, and policymakers must grapple with how best to manage its potential to reshape biology and society alike.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the advancements in CRISPR-Cas9 technology and emphasize its promise in scientific research.
B. To discuss the potential risks and ethical dilemmas associated with genetic engineering and advocate for increased regulation.
C. To present a balanced view of the benefits and risks of CRISPR-Cas9 technology, emphasizing the need for thoughtful regulation.
D. To critique the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in human embryos, highlighting the social risks it could create.
E. To argue that the future of genetic engineering is contingent on addressing global challenges like food security and genetic diseases.
However, while many researchers view CRISPR-Cas9 as a tool of unparalleled promise, others express caution, noting its potential for misuse and unintended consequences. Proponents argue that the ability to edit genes in model organisms such as fruit flies and mice has already advanced the understanding of numerous genetic conditions, paving the way for breakthroughs in therapeutic interventions, including the correction of genetic disorders in humans. They emphasize that CRISPR-Cas9's versatility across a wide range of organisms could lead to innovations in crop engineering, disease resistance, and even climate adaptation strategies.
Critics, however, caution that the technology’s power comes with profound ethical dilemmas. The ability to edit human embryos, for example, raises fears of “designer babies” and unintended social inequalities. Moreover, the long-term ecological effects of altering the genomes of species within complex ecosystems remain poorly understood. Some argue that the rush to apply CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture and medicine has outpaced the necessary ethical frameworks, with policymakers struggling to catch up.
Central to this debate is the question of whether the potential benefits of CRISPR-Cas9 outweigh its risks. Advocates of regulation believe that stringent guidelines are essential to prevent misuse, but others contend that such restrictions might stifle scientific progress. Some even posit that delaying the full deployment of CRISPR-Cas9 could hinder advances that might address pressing global challenges, such as food security and genetic diseases.
Ultimately, the future of CRISPR-Cas9—and genetic engineering more broadly—depends on striking a balance between innovation and caution. As this technology continues to evolve, scientists, ethicists, and policymakers must grapple with how best to manage its potential to reshape biology and society alike.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the advancements in CRISPR-Cas9 technology and emphasize its promise in scientific research.
B. To discuss the potential risks and ethical dilemmas associated with genetic engineering and advocate for increased regulation.
C. To present a balanced view of the benefits and risks of CRISPR-Cas9 technology, emphasizing the need for thoughtful regulation.
D. To critique the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in human embryos, highlighting the social risks it could create.
E. To argue that the future of genetic engineering is contingent on addressing global challenges like food security and genetic diseases.
05 Oct 2024, 21:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
#167700
Recent breakthroughs in molecular biology, particularly through the development of CRISPR-Cas9, have revolutionized the field of genetic engineering. CRISPR-Cas9, derived from a bacterial immune mechanism, allows precise manipulation of DNA, enabling targeted gene deletions, insertions, or replacements with far greater simplicity and efficiency than previous technologies such as zinc finger nucleases and TALENs. Its introduction has been heralded as a transformative leap forward in gene editing, accelerating research in genetics, medicine, and agriculture.
However, while many researchers view CRISPR-Cas9 as a tool of unparalleled promise, others express caution, noting its potential for misuse and unintended consequences. Proponents argue that the ability to edit genes in model organisms such as fruit flies and mice has already advanced the understanding of numerous genetic conditions, paving the way for breakthroughs in therapeutic interventions, including the correction of genetic disorders in humans. They emphasize that CRISPR-Cas9's versatility across a wide range of organisms could lead to innovations in crop engineering, disease resistance, and even climate adaptation strategies.
Critics, however, caution that the technology’s power comes with profound ethical dilemmas. The ability to edit human embryos, for example, raises fears of “designer babies” and unintended social inequalities. Moreover, the long-term ecological effects of altering the genomes of species within complex ecosystems remain poorly understood. Some argue that the rush to apply CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture and medicine has outpaced the necessary ethical frameworks, with policymakers struggling to catch up.
Central to this debate is the question of whether the potential benefits of CRISPR-Cas9 outweigh its risks. Advocates of regulation believe that stringent guidelines are essential to prevent misuse, but others contend that such restrictions might stifle scientific progress. Some even posit that delaying the full deployment of CRISPR-Cas9 could hinder advances that might address pressing global challenges, such as food security and genetic diseases.
Ultimately, the future of CRISPR-Cas9—and genetic engineering more broadly—depends on striking a balance between innovation and caution. As this technology continues to evolve, scientists, ethicists, and policymakers must grapple with how best to manage its potential to reshape biology and society alike.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the advancements in CRISPR-Cas9 technology and emphasize its promise in scientific research.
B. To discuss the potential risks and ethical dilemmas associated with genetic engineering and advocate for increased regulation.
C. To present a balanced view of the benefits and risks of CRISPR-Cas9 technology, emphasizing the need for thoughtful regulation.
D. To critique the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in human embryos, highlighting the social risks it could create.
E. To argue that the future of genetic engineering is contingent on addressing global challenges like food security and genetic diseases.
(A): Incorrect. This option overlooks the broader discussion of ethical risks and regulation. The passage is more balanced and does not focus solely on highlighting the technological advancements.
(B): Incorrect. The passage does not advocate for increased regulation. Instead, it presents a more balanced view, weighing the potential benefits and risks without strongly pushing for a specific regulatory stance.
(C): Correct Answer. The passage presents a balanced perspective on the benefits and risks of CRISPR-Cas9, emphasizing the need for careful regulation to ensure responsible use. It mentions both the technology's scientific promise and the ethical dilemmas that need to be addressed.
(D): Incorrect. The passage does not focus on critiquing its use. The passage is broader, discussing both benefits and risks, rather than concentrating just on social risks. This option scope is too narrow.
(E): Incorrect. The future of genetic engineering does not depend on adressing global challenges. It may address it but it does not depend on it.
Answer: C
#167700
Recent breakthroughs in molecular biology, particularly through the development of CRISPR-Cas9, have revolutionized the field of genetic engineering. CRISPR-Cas9, derived from a bacterial immune mechanism, allows precise manipulation of DNA, enabling targeted gene deletions, insertions, or replacements with far greater simplicity and efficiency than previous technologies such as zinc finger nucleases and TALENs. Its introduction has been heralded as a transformative leap forward in gene editing, accelerating research in genetics, medicine, and agriculture.
However, while many researchers view CRISPR-Cas9 as a tool of unparalleled promise, others express caution, noting its potential for misuse and unintended consequences. Proponents argue that the ability to edit genes in model organisms such as fruit flies and mice has already advanced the understanding of numerous genetic conditions, paving the way for breakthroughs in therapeutic interventions, including the correction of genetic disorders in humans. They emphasize that CRISPR-Cas9's versatility across a wide range of organisms could lead to innovations in crop engineering, disease resistance, and even climate adaptation strategies.
Critics, however, caution that the technology’s power comes with profound ethical dilemmas. The ability to edit human embryos, for example, raises fears of “designer babies” and unintended social inequalities. Moreover, the long-term ecological effects of altering the genomes of species within complex ecosystems remain poorly understood. Some argue that the rush to apply CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture and medicine has outpaced the necessary ethical frameworks, with policymakers struggling to catch up.
Central to this debate is the question of whether the potential benefits of CRISPR-Cas9 outweigh its risks. Advocates of regulation believe that stringent guidelines are essential to prevent misuse, but others contend that such restrictions might stifle scientific progress. Some even posit that delaying the full deployment of CRISPR-Cas9 could hinder advances that might address pressing global challenges, such as food security and genetic diseases.
Ultimately, the future of CRISPR-Cas9—and genetic engineering more broadly—depends on striking a balance between innovation and caution. As this technology continues to evolve, scientists, ethicists, and policymakers must grapple with how best to manage its potential to reshape biology and society alike.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To highlight the advancements in CRISPR-Cas9 technology and emphasize its promise in scientific research.
B. To discuss the potential risks and ethical dilemmas associated with genetic engineering and advocate for increased regulation.
C. To present a balanced view of the benefits and risks of CRISPR-Cas9 technology, emphasizing the need for thoughtful regulation.
D. To critique the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in human embryos, highlighting the social risks it could create.
E. To argue that the future of genetic engineering is contingent on addressing global challenges like food security and genetic diseases.
(A): Incorrect. This option overlooks the broader discussion of ethical risks and regulation. The passage is more balanced and does not focus solely on highlighting the technological advancements.
(B): Incorrect. The passage does not advocate for increased regulation. Instead, it presents a more balanced view, weighing the potential benefits and risks without strongly pushing for a specific regulatory stance.
(C): Correct Answer. The passage presents a balanced perspective on the benefits and risks of CRISPR-Cas9, emphasizing the need for careful regulation to ensure responsible use. It mentions both the technology's scientific promise and the ethical dilemmas that need to be addressed.
(D): Incorrect. The passage does not focus on critiquing its use. The passage is broader, discussing both benefits and risks, rather than concentrating just on social risks. This option scope is too narrow.
(E): Incorrect. The future of genetic engineering does not depend on adressing global challenges. It may address it but it does not depend on it.
Answer: C
