|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
21 Jun 2025, 20:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
According to the passage, each of the following is true of some period in Edo-period Japan EXCEPT:
A. Wealthy merchants gradually undermined class distinctions by adopting luxurious clothing.
B. Sumptuary laws regulated the use of fabrics, colors, and patterns to preserve social hierarchy.
C. Economic power began to outweigh hereditary status by the mid-19th century.
D. The shogunate enforced dress codes to preserve samurai distinction from commoners.
E. By funding kabuki, merchants gained privileges once reserved for samurai.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
According to the passage, each of the following is true of some period in Edo-period Japan EXCEPT:
A. Wealthy merchants gradually undermined class distinctions by adopting luxurious clothing.
B. Sumptuary laws regulated the use of fabrics, colors, and patterns to preserve social hierarchy.
C. Economic power began to outweigh hereditary status by the mid-19th century.
D. The shogunate enforced dress codes to preserve samurai distinction from commoners.
E. By funding kabuki, merchants gained privileges once reserved for samurai.
21 Jun 2025, 20:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
According to the passage, each of the following is true of some period in Edo-period Japan EXCEPT:
A. Wealthy merchants gradually undermined class distinctions by adopting luxurious clothing.
B. Sumptuary laws regulated the use of fabrics, colors, and patterns to preserve social hierarchy.
C. Economic power began to outweigh hereditary status by the mid-19th century.
D. The shogunate enforced dress codes to preserve samurai distinction from commoners.
E. By funding kabuki, merchants gained privileges once reserved for samurai.
A) Incorrect. The passage notes that prosperous merchants “began to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions.” This confirms the claim, so it is not the exception.
B) Incorrect. Shōgunal edicts “controlled the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns” to preserve the social hierarchy, exactly matching option B. Therefore B is supported and cannot be the exception.
C) Incorrect. The text states that by the mid-nineteenth century “economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence.” This supports option C, so it is not the exception.
D) Incorrect. The first paragraph explains that dress codes distinguished the samurai from commoners, and the second paragraph says new restrictions were imposed “so that no merchant could appear their equal.” This supports option D.
E) Correct. The passage does say merchants sponsored kabuki and other cultural events to display wealth, yet it immediately adds that the shogunate tightened dress rules “so that no merchant could appear their equal.” Sponsorship let merchants show off, but it did not grant them privileges formerly reserved for samurai; in fact, the authorities acted to prevent that outcome. Because the statement claims merchants gained such privileges, which the passage contradicts (in the context of the sentence that follows), option E is the only choice not supported by the text.
Answer: E
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
According to the passage, each of the following is true of some period in Edo-period Japan EXCEPT:
A. Wealthy merchants gradually undermined class distinctions by adopting luxurious clothing.
B. Sumptuary laws regulated the use of fabrics, colors, and patterns to preserve social hierarchy.
C. Economic power began to outweigh hereditary status by the mid-19th century.
D. The shogunate enforced dress codes to preserve samurai distinction from commoners.
E. By funding kabuki, merchants gained privileges once reserved for samurai.
A) Incorrect. The passage notes that prosperous merchants “began to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions.” This confirms the claim, so it is not the exception.
B) Incorrect. Shōgunal edicts “controlled the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns” to preserve the social hierarchy, exactly matching option B. Therefore B is supported and cannot be the exception.
C) Incorrect. The text states that by the mid-nineteenth century “economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence.” This supports option C, so it is not the exception.
D) Incorrect. The first paragraph explains that dress codes distinguished the samurai from commoners, and the second paragraph says new restrictions were imposed “so that no merchant could appear their equal.” This supports option D.
E) Correct. The passage does say merchants sponsored kabuki and other cultural events to display wealth, yet it immediately adds that the shogunate tightened dress rules “so that no merchant could appear their equal.” Sponsorship let merchants show off, but it did not grant them privileges formerly reserved for samurai; in fact, the authorities acted to prevent that outcome. Because the statement claims merchants gained such privileges, which the passage contradicts (in the context of the sentence that follows), option E is the only choice not supported by the text.
Answer: E
11 Oct 2025, 10:14
Kudos
Bookmarks
Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings.
isn't good/distinct cloth reserved for samurai and merchants using it/showcasing it might be like taking privileges that were of samurai's( to showcase distinct clothes)?
isn't good/distinct cloth reserved for samurai and merchants using it/showcasing it might be like taking privileges that were of samurai's( to showcase distinct clothes)?
