Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
24 Aug 2025, 21:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
The design of public transportation systems in large metropolitan areas illustrates how complex networks balance accessibility, cost, and speed. In highly populated cities such as New York and Tokyo, subway lines average 8–10 stations per mile, whereas newer, automobile-oriented cities like Phoenix may feature fewer than four. Yet the growth in station count is sub-linear: when a city’s population doubles, the number of stops typically rises by only about 60 percent. Transit planners therefore concentrate new stations in dense commercial corridors, where ridership and fare revenue justify the expense, while leaving outlying zones with wider stop spacing. The resulting pattern creates a network that expands with population but avoids the financial and scheduling penalties of building a perfectly uniform grid.
A comparable trade-off shapes biological neural networks. Across mammals, total neuron count increases with brain volume, but the average number of synaptic connections per neuron declines in larger brains. A mouse neuron might link to thousands of partners, whereas an elephant neuron connects to only a few hundred. This phenomenon, termed neural scaling, limits both the metabolic cost of maintaining long-range axons and the signal-propagation delays that would arise if every additional neuron established the same density of links. Computational studies show that such tapered connectivity lets big brains support greater absolute processing power without incurring an exponential rise in wiring length and energy demand.
Systems scientist Deborah Gordon argues that the two cases exemplify a universal principle of network optimization. Whether engineers map subway routes or neurons self-organize during development, each system must weigh the benefits of dense connectivity—short travel times, rapid information flow—against constraints of energy, space, and time. These trade-offs yield scaling laws that echo across domains: the most efficient large networks are neither maximally connected nor minimally built but instead occupy a mathematically predictable middle ground of “just-enough” links.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. describe a principle that explains scaling patterns observed in diverse networks.
B. argue for the universal applicability of a specific scientific theory across all contexts.
C. compare and contrast the physical structures of natural and human-made systems.
D. illustrate a biological phenomenon by drawing an analogy to urban transportation design.
E. claim that efficiency is the single defining feature of every large-scale complex system.
A comparable trade-off shapes biological neural networks. Across mammals, total neuron count increases with brain volume, but the average number of synaptic connections per neuron declines in larger brains. A mouse neuron might link to thousands of partners, whereas an elephant neuron connects to only a few hundred. This phenomenon, termed neural scaling, limits both the metabolic cost of maintaining long-range axons and the signal-propagation delays that would arise if every additional neuron established the same density of links. Computational studies show that such tapered connectivity lets big brains support greater absolute processing power without incurring an exponential rise in wiring length and energy demand.
Systems scientist Deborah Gordon argues that the two cases exemplify a universal principle of network optimization. Whether engineers map subway routes or neurons self-organize during development, each system must weigh the benefits of dense connectivity—short travel times, rapid information flow—against constraints of energy, space, and time. These trade-offs yield scaling laws that echo across domains: the most efficient large networks are neither maximally connected nor minimally built but instead occupy a mathematically predictable middle ground of “just-enough” links.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. describe a principle that explains scaling patterns observed in diverse networks.
B. argue for the universal applicability of a specific scientific theory across all contexts.
C. compare and contrast the physical structures of natural and human-made systems.
D. illustrate a biological phenomenon by drawing an analogy to urban transportation design.
E. claim that efficiency is the single defining feature of every large-scale complex system.
24 Aug 2025, 21:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
The design of public transportation systems in large metropolitan areas illustrates how complex networks balance accessibility, cost, and speed. In highly populated cities such as New York and Tokyo, subway lines average 8–10 stations per mile, whereas newer, automobile-oriented cities like Phoenix may feature fewer than four. Yet the growth in station count is sub-linear: when a city’s population doubles, the number of stops typically rises by only about 60 percent. Transit planners therefore concentrate new stations in dense commercial corridors, where ridership and fare revenue justify the expense, while leaving outlying zones with wider stop spacing. The resulting pattern creates a network that expands with population but avoids the financial and scheduling penalties of building a perfectly uniform grid.
A comparable trade-off shapes biological neural networks. Across mammals, total neuron count increases with brain volume, but the average number of synaptic connections per neuron declines in larger brains. A mouse neuron might link to thousands of partners, whereas an elephant neuron connects to only a few hundred. This phenomenon, termed neural scaling, limits both the metabolic cost of maintaining long-range axons and the signal-propagation delays that would arise if every additional neuron established the same density of links. Computational studies show that such tapered connectivity lets big brains support greater absolute processing power without incurring an exponential rise in wiring length and energy demand.
Systems scientist Deborah Gordon argues that the two cases exemplify a universal principle of network optimization. Whether engineers map subway routes or neurons self-organize during development, each system must weigh the benefits of dense connectivity—short travel times, rapid information flow—against constraints of energy, space, and time. These trade-offs yield scaling laws that echo across domains: the most efficient large networks are neither maximally connected nor minimally built but instead occupy a mathematically predictable middle ground of “just-enough” links.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. describe a principle that explains scaling patterns observed in diverse networks.
B. argue for the universal applicability of a specific scientific theory across all contexts.
C. compare and contrast the physical structures of natural and human-made systems.
D. illustrate a biological phenomenon by drawing an analogy to urban transportation design.
E. claim that efficiency is the single defining feature of every large-scale complex system.
(A) Correct Answer: The passage shows how both subway systems and mammalian brains obey a similar sub-linear scaling law, then cites Deborah Gordon’s claim that this reflects a universal principle of network optimization. Thus its main goal is to present a cross-domain principle.
(B) Incorrect: The author reports Gordon’s view but does not mount a sustained argument or present evidence to persuade the reader; the tone is descriptive rather than advocacy-oriented.
(C) Incorrect: Structural differences are mentioned only in service of showing a shared scaling pattern; contrasting form is not the passage’s focus.
(D) Incorrect: Although a biological example is paired with a transit example, the passage’s purpose is broader than merely illustrating a biological phenomenon.
(E) Incorrect: Efficiency is one of several factors (energy, space, time) discussed; the passage does not claim that efficiency alone defines all complex systems.
Answer: A
The design of public transportation systems in large metropolitan areas illustrates how complex networks balance accessibility, cost, and speed. In highly populated cities such as New York and Tokyo, subway lines average 8–10 stations per mile, whereas newer, automobile-oriented cities like Phoenix may feature fewer than four. Yet the growth in station count is sub-linear: when a city’s population doubles, the number of stops typically rises by only about 60 percent. Transit planners therefore concentrate new stations in dense commercial corridors, where ridership and fare revenue justify the expense, while leaving outlying zones with wider stop spacing. The resulting pattern creates a network that expands with population but avoids the financial and scheduling penalties of building a perfectly uniform grid.
A comparable trade-off shapes biological neural networks. Across mammals, total neuron count increases with brain volume, but the average number of synaptic connections per neuron declines in larger brains. A mouse neuron might link to thousands of partners, whereas an elephant neuron connects to only a few hundred. This phenomenon, termed neural scaling, limits both the metabolic cost of maintaining long-range axons and the signal-propagation delays that would arise if every additional neuron established the same density of links. Computational studies show that such tapered connectivity lets big brains support greater absolute processing power without incurring an exponential rise in wiring length and energy demand.
Systems scientist Deborah Gordon argues that the two cases exemplify a universal principle of network optimization. Whether engineers map subway routes or neurons self-organize during development, each system must weigh the benefits of dense connectivity—short travel times, rapid information flow—against constraints of energy, space, and time. These trade-offs yield scaling laws that echo across domains: the most efficient large networks are neither maximally connected nor minimally built but instead occupy a mathematically predictable middle ground of “just-enough” links.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. describe a principle that explains scaling patterns observed in diverse networks.
B. argue for the universal applicability of a specific scientific theory across all contexts.
C. compare and contrast the physical structures of natural and human-made systems.
D. illustrate a biological phenomenon by drawing an analogy to urban transportation design.
E. claim that efficiency is the single defining feature of every large-scale complex system.
(A) Correct Answer: The passage shows how both subway systems and mammalian brains obey a similar sub-linear scaling law, then cites Deborah Gordon’s claim that this reflects a universal principle of network optimization. Thus its main goal is to present a cross-domain principle.
(B) Incorrect: The author reports Gordon’s view but does not mount a sustained argument or present evidence to persuade the reader; the tone is descriptive rather than advocacy-oriented.
(C) Incorrect: Structural differences are mentioned only in service of showing a shared scaling pattern; contrasting form is not the passage’s focus.
(D) Incorrect: Although a biological example is paired with a transit example, the passage’s purpose is broader than merely illustrating a biological phenomenon.
(E) Incorrect: Efficiency is one of several factors (energy, space, time) discussed; the passage does not claim that efficiency alone defines all complex systems.
Answer: A
