Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
03 Oct 2025, 21:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
After the Great Depression (1929 - 1939), efforts to reform labor conditions in the United States intensified, driven by widespread economic hardship and growing calls for workers' protections. Initially, alliances between labor rights advocates and business leaders appeared promising, but as the labor movement pushed for broader reforms, tensions emerged. In response, Frances Perkins (1880 - 1965), the first woman to serve as U.S. Secretary of Labor, played a crucial role in bridging these divides and advancing groundbreaking labor policies, though her contributions are often overshadowed by more prominent political figures of the era.
Perkins employed both moral and practical appeals to unify various factions and promote labor reforms. Her moral arguments were rooted in the belief that economic security and fair labor practices were essential to human dignity. She asserted that safeguarding workers’ rights would not only alleviate suffering but also reflect the nation’s core democratic values. Perkins emphasized that a failure to protect laborers, particularly vulnerable populations like women and children, would undermine the social fabric of the country. By framing labor rights as a moral imperative, she sought to inspire broader public support for reforms like the establishment of minimum wages and maximum working hours.
In her practical appeals, Perkins underscored the economic advantages of labor reforms. She argued that improving workplace conditions and wages would lead to increased productivity and economic stability, ultimately benefiting businesses and workers alike. Perkins highlighted that reducing workplace accidents and worker turnover would lower costs for employers in the long run. This pragmatic approach resonated with business leaders who were initially resistant to government intervention but saw potential economic benefits in reducing labor unrest and boosting consumer purchasing power.
A defining aspect of Perkins’s strategy was her advocacy for the Social Security Act of 1935, which she championed as a means of providing economic security for elderly and unemployed workers. Perkins believed that creating a safety net would not only prevent future economic crises but also reinforce public trust in government institutions. Her leadership in shaping New Deal labor policies left a lasting impact, establishing protections that continue to define the American workplace. Though Perkins faced significant opposition, her ability to balance ethical imperatives with practical solutions helped forge a new era of labor rights in the United States, cementing her legacy as a transformative figure in American labor history.
The passage most strongly suggests that which of the following statements expresses an appeal that Frances Perkins made to business leaders?
A. Extending labor protections to vulnerable workers may raise upfront costs, yet over time a healthier, more secure workforce can boost productivity and reduce turnover expenses for employers.
B. Addressing unsafe working conditions benefits workers but may temporarily disrupt industrial output and efficiency.
C. Raising wages for the lowest-paid employees is both a moral obligation and a practical way to expand consumer demand, ultimately lifting business revenues.
D. Addressing unsafe working conditions and low wages benefits businesses by fostering a more stable and efficient workforce.
E. Labor protections stabilize the workforce and, after an initial adjustment period, generate broader economic gains that flow back to individual firms through lower disruptions and higher consumer spending.
Perkins employed both moral and practical appeals to unify various factions and promote labor reforms. Her moral arguments were rooted in the belief that economic security and fair labor practices were essential to human dignity. She asserted that safeguarding workers’ rights would not only alleviate suffering but also reflect the nation’s core democratic values. Perkins emphasized that a failure to protect laborers, particularly vulnerable populations like women and children, would undermine the social fabric of the country. By framing labor rights as a moral imperative, she sought to inspire broader public support for reforms like the establishment of minimum wages and maximum working hours.
In her practical appeals, Perkins underscored the economic advantages of labor reforms. She argued that improving workplace conditions and wages would lead to increased productivity and economic stability, ultimately benefiting businesses and workers alike. Perkins highlighted that reducing workplace accidents and worker turnover would lower costs for employers in the long run. This pragmatic approach resonated with business leaders who were initially resistant to government intervention but saw potential economic benefits in reducing labor unrest and boosting consumer purchasing power.
A defining aspect of Perkins’s strategy was her advocacy for the Social Security Act of 1935, which she championed as a means of providing economic security for elderly and unemployed workers. Perkins believed that creating a safety net would not only prevent future economic crises but also reinforce public trust in government institutions. Her leadership in shaping New Deal labor policies left a lasting impact, establishing protections that continue to define the American workplace. Though Perkins faced significant opposition, her ability to balance ethical imperatives with practical solutions helped forge a new era of labor rights in the United States, cementing her legacy as a transformative figure in American labor history.
The passage most strongly suggests that which of the following statements expresses an appeal that Frances Perkins made to business leaders?
A. Extending labor protections to vulnerable workers may raise upfront costs, yet over time a healthier, more secure workforce can boost productivity and reduce turnover expenses for employers.
B. Addressing unsafe working conditions benefits workers but may temporarily disrupt industrial output and efficiency.
C. Raising wages for the lowest-paid employees is both a moral obligation and a practical way to expand consumer demand, ultimately lifting business revenues.
D. Addressing unsafe working conditions and low wages benefits businesses by fostering a more stable and efficient workforce.
E. Labor protections stabilize the workforce and, after an initial adjustment period, generate broader economic gains that flow back to individual firms through lower disruptions and higher consumer spending.
03 Oct 2025, 21:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
After the Great Depression (1929 - 1939), efforts to reform labor conditions in the United States intensified, driven by widespread economic hardship and growing calls for workers' protections. Initially, alliances between labor rights advocates and business leaders appeared promising, but as the labor movement pushed for broader reforms, tensions emerged. In response, Frances Perkins (1880 - 1965), the first woman to serve as U.S. Secretary of Labor, played a crucial role in bridging these divides and advancing groundbreaking labor policies, though her contributions are often overshadowed by more prominent political figures of the era.
Perkins employed both moral and practical appeals to unify various factions and promote labor reforms. Her moral arguments were rooted in the belief that economic security and fair labor practices were essential to human dignity. She asserted that safeguarding workers’ rights would not only alleviate suffering but also reflect the nation’s core democratic values. Perkins emphasized that a failure to protect laborers, particularly vulnerable populations like women and children, would undermine the social fabric of the country. By framing labor rights as a moral imperative, she sought to inspire broader public support for reforms like the establishment of minimum wages and maximum working hours.
In her practical appeals, Perkins underscored the economic advantages of labor reforms. She argued that improving workplace conditions and wages would lead to increased productivity and economic stability, ultimately benefiting businesses and workers alike. Perkins highlighted that reducing workplace accidents and worker turnover would lower costs for employers in the long run. This pragmatic approach resonated with business leaders who were initially resistant to government intervention but saw potential economic benefits in reducing labor unrest and boosting consumer purchasing power.
A defining aspect of Perkins’s strategy was her advocacy for the Social Security Act of 1935, which she championed as a means of providing economic security for elderly and unemployed workers. Perkins believed that creating a safety net would not only prevent future economic crises but also reinforce public trust in government institutions. Her leadership in shaping New Deal labor policies left a lasting impact, establishing protections that continue to define the American workplace. Though Perkins faced significant opposition, her ability to balance ethical imperatives with practical solutions helped forge a new era of labor rights in the United States, cementing her legacy as a transformative figure in American labor history.
The passage most strongly suggests that which of the following statements expresses an appeal that Frances Perkins made to business leaders?
A. Extending labor protections to vulnerable workers may raise upfront costs, yet over time a healthier, more secure workforce can boost productivity and reduce turnover expenses for employers.
B. Addressing unsafe working conditions benefits workers but may temporarily disrupt industrial output and efficiency.
C. Raising wages for the lowest-paid employees is both a moral obligation and a practical way to expand consumer demand, ultimately lifting business revenues.
D. Addressing unsafe working conditions and low wages benefits businesses by fostering a more stable and efficient workforce.
E. Labor protections stabilize the workforce and, after an initial adjustment period, generate broader economic gains that flow back to individual firms through lower disruptions and higher consumer spending.
A) Incorrect. Perkins did mention protecting vulnerable groups, yet that point belonged to her moral appeal aimed at the public. When she spoke to business leaders she highlighted concrete economic gains such as higher productivity and lower accident costs. This option places the spotlight on vulnerable workers and upfront expenses, so it does not capture her main business-focused message.
B) Incorrect. The passage never states that improving safety would hurt output or efficiency, even temporarily. Perkins argued that fewer accidents and lower turnover would cut costs and keep production steady, the opposite of what this choice claims.
C) Incorrect. Linking wage increases to stronger consumer demand appears in the passage, but the option mixes that practical benefit with a broad moral claim. Perkins separated her moral arguments from her economic pitch. Her appeal to employers centered on direct operational advantages rather than on a moral duty to raise wages.
D) Correct Answer. Perkins told business leaders that fixing unsafe conditions and raising wages would create a stable, efficient workforce. The passage specifies that better conditions reduce accidents and turnover, lowering costs and boosting productivity. This option restates her practical argument almost word for word.
E) Incorrect. The promise of “broader economic gains” is too vague. Perkins presented employers with specific, immediate benefits such as fewer injuries, less turnover, and higher productivity. The option also skips the explicit link to workplace safety that was central to her case.
Answer: D
After the Great Depression (1929 - 1939), efforts to reform labor conditions in the United States intensified, driven by widespread economic hardship and growing calls for workers' protections. Initially, alliances between labor rights advocates and business leaders appeared promising, but as the labor movement pushed for broader reforms, tensions emerged. In response, Frances Perkins (1880 - 1965), the first woman to serve as U.S. Secretary of Labor, played a crucial role in bridging these divides and advancing groundbreaking labor policies, though her contributions are often overshadowed by more prominent political figures of the era.
Perkins employed both moral and practical appeals to unify various factions and promote labor reforms. Her moral arguments were rooted in the belief that economic security and fair labor practices were essential to human dignity. She asserted that safeguarding workers’ rights would not only alleviate suffering but also reflect the nation’s core democratic values. Perkins emphasized that a failure to protect laborers, particularly vulnerable populations like women and children, would undermine the social fabric of the country. By framing labor rights as a moral imperative, she sought to inspire broader public support for reforms like the establishment of minimum wages and maximum working hours.
In her practical appeals, Perkins underscored the economic advantages of labor reforms. She argued that improving workplace conditions and wages would lead to increased productivity and economic stability, ultimately benefiting businesses and workers alike. Perkins highlighted that reducing workplace accidents and worker turnover would lower costs for employers in the long run. This pragmatic approach resonated with business leaders who were initially resistant to government intervention but saw potential economic benefits in reducing labor unrest and boosting consumer purchasing power.
A defining aspect of Perkins’s strategy was her advocacy for the Social Security Act of 1935, which she championed as a means of providing economic security for elderly and unemployed workers. Perkins believed that creating a safety net would not only prevent future economic crises but also reinforce public trust in government institutions. Her leadership in shaping New Deal labor policies left a lasting impact, establishing protections that continue to define the American workplace. Though Perkins faced significant opposition, her ability to balance ethical imperatives with practical solutions helped forge a new era of labor rights in the United States, cementing her legacy as a transformative figure in American labor history.
The passage most strongly suggests that which of the following statements expresses an appeal that Frances Perkins made to business leaders?
A. Extending labor protections to vulnerable workers may raise upfront costs, yet over time a healthier, more secure workforce can boost productivity and reduce turnover expenses for employers.
B. Addressing unsafe working conditions benefits workers but may temporarily disrupt industrial output and efficiency.
C. Raising wages for the lowest-paid employees is both a moral obligation and a practical way to expand consumer demand, ultimately lifting business revenues.
D. Addressing unsafe working conditions and low wages benefits businesses by fostering a more stable and efficient workforce.
E. Labor protections stabilize the workforce and, after an initial adjustment period, generate broader economic gains that flow back to individual firms through lower disruptions and higher consumer spending.
A) Incorrect. Perkins did mention protecting vulnerable groups, yet that point belonged to her moral appeal aimed at the public. When she spoke to business leaders she highlighted concrete economic gains such as higher productivity and lower accident costs. This option places the spotlight on vulnerable workers and upfront expenses, so it does not capture her main business-focused message.
B) Incorrect. The passage never states that improving safety would hurt output or efficiency, even temporarily. Perkins argued that fewer accidents and lower turnover would cut costs and keep production steady, the opposite of what this choice claims.
C) Incorrect. Linking wage increases to stronger consumer demand appears in the passage, but the option mixes that practical benefit with a broad moral claim. Perkins separated her moral arguments from her economic pitch. Her appeal to employers centered on direct operational advantages rather than on a moral duty to raise wages.
D) Correct Answer. Perkins told business leaders that fixing unsafe conditions and raising wages would create a stable, efficient workforce. The passage specifies that better conditions reduce accidents and turnover, lowering costs and boosting productivity. This option restates her practical argument almost word for word.
E) Incorrect. The promise of “broader economic gains” is too vague. Perkins presented employers with specific, immediate benefits such as fewer injuries, less turnover, and higher productivity. The option also skips the explicit link to workplace safety that was central to her case.
Answer: D
