Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products.
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
May 1810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.- May 19
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep.... - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
12 Oct 2025, 22:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
By the early twentieth century, the gold standard had become a cornerstone of the international financial system. Under this arrangement, currencies were convertible into a fixed quantity of gold, anchoring exchange rates and constraining governments from expanding the money supply beyond their reserves. The system’s defenders regarded this rigidity as a safeguard against political interference and fiscal irresponsibility. In their view, the discipline imposed by gold convertibility maintained both domestic price stability and global confidence, even if it limited short-term flexibility.
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the author’s claim that adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression?
A. Spending cuts in one gold-standard country slashed demand for imports, shrinking exports in its gold-standard trading partners, which then cut their own spending to protect reserves.
B. Countries that abandoned the gold standard were able to devalue their currencies and expand credit, but their recovery did not boost trade with nations still tied to gold.
C. Countries still on gold raised interest rates to defend reserves; the resulting credit squeeze cut off both trade finance and long-term lending across the gold bloc, deepening recessions in each partner economy.
D. Nations with large gold reserves delayed cutting spending longer than others, but eventually faced the same contraction once foreign demand weakened.
E. Countries that left the gold standard recovered first because they maintained stronger fiscal discipline than those that remained on gold.
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the author’s claim that adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression?
A. Spending cuts in one gold-standard country slashed demand for imports, shrinking exports in its gold-standard trading partners, which then cut their own spending to protect reserves.
B. Countries that abandoned the gold standard were able to devalue their currencies and expand credit, but their recovery did not boost trade with nations still tied to gold.
C. Countries still on gold raised interest rates to defend reserves; the resulting credit squeeze cut off both trade finance and long-term lending across the gold bloc, deepening recessions in each partner economy.
D. Nations with large gold reserves delayed cutting spending longer than others, but eventually faced the same contraction once foreign demand weakened.
E. Countries that left the gold standard recovered first because they maintained stronger fiscal discipline than those that remained on gold.
12 Oct 2025, 22:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
By the early twentieth century, the gold standard had become a cornerstone of the international financial system. Under this arrangement, currencies were convertible into a fixed quantity of gold, anchoring exchange rates and constraining governments from expanding the money supply beyond their reserves. The system’s defenders regarded this rigidity as a safeguard against political interference and fiscal irresponsibility. In their view, the discipline imposed by gold convertibility maintained both domestic price stability and global confidence, even if it limited short-term flexibility.
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the author’s claim that adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression?
A. Spending cuts in one gold-standard country slashed demand for imports, shrinking exports in its gold-standard trading partners, which then cut their own spending to protect reserves.
B. Countries that abandoned the gold standard were able to devalue their currencies and expand credit, but their recovery did not boost trade with nations still tied to gold.
C. Countries still on gold raised interest rates to defend reserves; the resulting credit squeeze cut off both trade finance and long-term lending across the gold bloc, deepening recessions in each partner economy.
D. Nations with large gold reserves delayed cutting spending longer than others, but eventually faced the same contraction once foreign demand weakened.
E. Countries that left the gold standard recovered first because they maintained stronger fiscal discipline than those that remained on gold.
A) Correct Answer. A spending cut in one gold-standard country reduces its imports, which in turn cuts export demand in partner economies still on gold. Those partners then tighten spending to protect their reserves, propagating the downturn across borders. This scenario matches the author’s view that gold‐standard rules transmitted distress internationally.
B) Incorrect. If countries that left gold recovered but their rebound did not lift trade with nations that stayed on gold, the outcome shows that contraction was not transmitted by gold ties. The statement does not illustrate cross-border contagion; instead it shows separate tracks for the two groups of countries.
C) Incorrect. The option admits that gold‐standard countries raised interest rates to defend reserves, yet it specifies that the result was “mainly” a drop in their own lending and investment, not a reduction in external demand. Because the contraction remains largely domestic rather than spilling into partner economies, the statement offers little evidence that adherence to gold spread distress across borders.
D) Incorrect. Delayed austerity in gold-rich nations followed by contraction when foreign demand weakens hints at international linkages, but it does not identify a gold-standard mechanism driving that spillover. The weakening of demand could occur under many monetary arrangements, so the support is indirect at best.
E) Incorrect. Claiming that countries off gold recovered first because of stricter fiscal discipline assigns success to domestic budget policy, not to abandoning gold. This explanation undercuts the author’s claim that sticking with gold was the key channel for spreading economic distress.
Answer: A
By the early twentieth century, the gold standard had become a cornerstone of the international financial system. Under this arrangement, currencies were convertible into a fixed quantity of gold, anchoring exchange rates and constraining governments from expanding the money supply beyond their reserves. The system’s defenders regarded this rigidity as a safeguard against political interference and fiscal irresponsibility. In their view, the discipline imposed by gold convertibility maintained both domestic price stability and global confidence, even if it limited short-term flexibility.
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the author’s claim that adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression?
A. Spending cuts in one gold-standard country slashed demand for imports, shrinking exports in its gold-standard trading partners, which then cut their own spending to protect reserves.
B. Countries that abandoned the gold standard were able to devalue their currencies and expand credit, but their recovery did not boost trade with nations still tied to gold.
C. Countries still on gold raised interest rates to defend reserves; the resulting credit squeeze cut off both trade finance and long-term lending across the gold bloc, deepening recessions in each partner economy.
D. Nations with large gold reserves delayed cutting spending longer than others, but eventually faced the same contraction once foreign demand weakened.
E. Countries that left the gold standard recovered first because they maintained stronger fiscal discipline than those that remained on gold.
A) Correct Answer. A spending cut in one gold-standard country reduces its imports, which in turn cuts export demand in partner economies still on gold. Those partners then tighten spending to protect their reserves, propagating the downturn across borders. This scenario matches the author’s view that gold‐standard rules transmitted distress internationally.
B) Incorrect. If countries that left gold recovered but their rebound did not lift trade with nations that stayed on gold, the outcome shows that contraction was not transmitted by gold ties. The statement does not illustrate cross-border contagion; instead it shows separate tracks for the two groups of countries.
C) Incorrect. The option admits that gold‐standard countries raised interest rates to defend reserves, yet it specifies that the result was “mainly” a drop in their own lending and investment, not a reduction in external demand. Because the contraction remains largely domestic rather than spilling into partner economies, the statement offers little evidence that adherence to gold spread distress across borders.
D) Incorrect. Delayed austerity in gold-rich nations followed by contraction when foreign demand weakens hints at international linkages, but it does not identify a gold-standard mechanism driving that spillover. The weakening of demand could occur under many monetary arrangements, so the support is indirect at best.
E) Incorrect. Claiming that countries off gold recovered first because of stricter fiscal discipline assigns success to domestic budget policy, not to abandoning gold. This explanation undercuts the author’s claim that sticking with gold was the key channel for spreading economic distress.
Answer: A
