Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 2710:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sept. 6, 9:30am-12:30pm EST- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Oct. 13, 2026 - Jan. 7, 2027, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
14 Oct 2025, 16:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
Despite substantial evidence suggesting that decentralized decision-making can lead to increased innovation and faster response times, most large corporations continue to favor centralized control structures. This raises the question: why do firms that emphasize efficiency and competitiveness shy away from models that could enhance these very attributes?
One explanation highlights risk aversion, large firms, having invested heavily in existing systems, are reluctant to disrupt operations with uncertain outcomes. Another perspective focuses on accountability concerns, suggesting that upper management prefers clear chains of command to minimize errors and ensure uniformity. A third view posits that while firms may experiment with decentralization in certain departments, piecemeal adoption dilutes the potential benefits of full-scale transformation.
While each explanation addresses part of the issue, they share significant limitations. Risk aversion theories emphasize the potential for loss but underestimate the capacity for controlled risk-taking, which many firms exhibit in product development or market expansion. Accountability-based arguments overlook the reality that centralized systems can suffer from bureaucratic delays and reduced employee engagement. Lastly, the fragmented adoption argument tends to treat decentralization as a binary choice, neglecting the nuanced ways in which decision-making can evolve across different levels of the organization.
An alternative framework draws from behavioral economics, suggesting that the success or failure of decentralized initiatives hinges on incentive alignment and cultural readiness. Decentralization is not a matter of policy alone but is embedded in the firm’s ability to cultivate trust and establish clear performance metrics at every level. In effect, decentralization thrives when employees feel empowered but also understand the parameters within which they operate. Rather than being implemented uniformly, successful decentralization often involves targeted shifts, where leadership delegates responsibility progressively, fostering a culture of accountability and innovation simultaneously.
Thus, the resistance to decentralization may stem less from the model itself and more from the absence of structures that facilitate its smooth integration. Where decentralization efforts falter, the fault often lies not in the concept but in the failure to adapt managerial frameworks that can harness its potential.
The passage most strongly suggests that most firms aim to
A. reduce operational risk by maintaining centralized decision-making structures.
B. cultivate innovation by gradually adopting decentralized decision-making processes.
C. increase efficiency and competitiveness by choosing organizational structures they believe will support those goals.
D. establish clear chains of accountability to enhance performance.
E. improve overall performance through the adoption of effective organizational practices.
One explanation highlights risk aversion, large firms, having invested heavily in existing systems, are reluctant to disrupt operations with uncertain outcomes. Another perspective focuses on accountability concerns, suggesting that upper management prefers clear chains of command to minimize errors and ensure uniformity. A third view posits that while firms may experiment with decentralization in certain departments, piecemeal adoption dilutes the potential benefits of full-scale transformation.
While each explanation addresses part of the issue, they share significant limitations. Risk aversion theories emphasize the potential for loss but underestimate the capacity for controlled risk-taking, which many firms exhibit in product development or market expansion. Accountability-based arguments overlook the reality that centralized systems can suffer from bureaucratic delays and reduced employee engagement. Lastly, the fragmented adoption argument tends to treat decentralization as a binary choice, neglecting the nuanced ways in which decision-making can evolve across different levels of the organization.
An alternative framework draws from behavioral economics, suggesting that the success or failure of decentralized initiatives hinges on incentive alignment and cultural readiness. Decentralization is not a matter of policy alone but is embedded in the firm’s ability to cultivate trust and establish clear performance metrics at every level. In effect, decentralization thrives when employees feel empowered but also understand the parameters within which they operate. Rather than being implemented uniformly, successful decentralization often involves targeted shifts, where leadership delegates responsibility progressively, fostering a culture of accountability and innovation simultaneously.
Thus, the resistance to decentralization may stem less from the model itself and more from the absence of structures that facilitate its smooth integration. Where decentralization efforts falter, the fault often lies not in the concept but in the failure to adapt managerial frameworks that can harness its potential.
The passage most strongly suggests that most firms aim to
A. reduce operational risk by maintaining centralized decision-making structures.
B. cultivate innovation by gradually adopting decentralized decision-making processes.
C. increase efficiency and competitiveness by choosing organizational structures they believe will support those goals.
D. establish clear chains of accountability to enhance performance.
E. improve overall performance through the adoption of effective organizational practices.
14 Oct 2025, 16:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Despite substantial evidence suggesting that decentralized decision-making can lead to increased innovation and faster response times, most large corporations continue to favor centralized control structures. This raises the question: why do firms that emphasize efficiency and competitiveness shy away from models that could enhance these very attributes?
One explanation highlights risk aversion, large firms, having invested heavily in existing systems, are reluctant to disrupt operations with uncertain outcomes. Another perspective focuses on accountability concerns, suggesting that upper management prefers clear chains of command to minimize errors and ensure uniformity. A third view posits that while firms may experiment with decentralization in certain departments, piecemeal adoption dilutes the potential benefits of full-scale transformation.
While each explanation addresses part of the issue, they share significant limitations. Risk aversion theories emphasize the potential for loss but underestimate the capacity for controlled risk-taking, which many firms exhibit in product development or market expansion. Accountability-based arguments overlook the reality that centralized systems can suffer from bureaucratic delays and reduced employee engagement. Lastly, the fragmented adoption argument tends to treat decentralization as a binary choice, neglecting the nuanced ways in which decision-making can evolve across different levels of the organization.
An alternative framework draws from behavioral economics, suggesting that the success or failure of decentralized initiatives hinges on incentive alignment and cultural readiness. Decentralization is not a matter of policy alone but is embedded in the firm’s ability to cultivate trust and establish clear performance metrics at every level. In effect, decentralization thrives when employees feel empowered but also understand the parameters within which they operate. Rather than being implemented uniformly, successful decentralization often involves targeted shifts, where leadership delegates responsibility progressively, fostering a culture of accountability and innovation simultaneously.
Thus, the resistance to decentralization may stem less from the model itself and more from the absence of structures that facilitate its smooth integration. Where decentralization efforts falter, the fault often lies not in the concept but in the failure to adapt managerial frameworks that can harness its potential.
The passage most strongly suggests that most firms aim to
A. reduce operational risk by maintaining centralized decision-making structures.
B. cultivate innovation by gradually adopting decentralized decision-making processes.
C. increase efficiency and competitiveness by choosing organizational structures they believe will support those goals.
D. establish clear chains of accountability to enhance performance.
E. improve overall performance through the adoption of effective organizational practices.
A) Incorrect. Risk control appears in the passage, yet the author introduces it as only one possible reason for keeping centralized structures. The overall discussion shows that firms place greatest weight on staying efficient and competitive, so risk reduction is not presented as the primary aim.
B) Incorrect. The passage observes that a few companies try decentralization in isolated departments. It also states that most large corporations continue to favor central control, which means a gradual shift toward decentralization is not their common strategy for fostering innovation.
C) Correct Answer. Early in the passage the author asks why companies that value “efficiency and competitiveness” often refuse to adopt models that might improve those very qualities. This question reveals the author’s view that firms pick whatever structure they think will support efficiency and competitiveness, whether that choice is centralization or decentralization.
D) Incorrect. Clear accountability is listed as a reason executives like centralization, but the author presents it as one factor among several. The passage does not imply that establishing clear accountability is the overarching goal pursued by most firms.
E) Incorrect. A general wish to improve overall performance applies to nearly any organization. The passage is more specific, repeatedly linking structural choices to the twin goals of efficiency and competitiveness rather than to performance in a broad sense.
Answer: C
Despite substantial evidence suggesting that decentralized decision-making can lead to increased innovation and faster response times, most large corporations continue to favor centralized control structures. This raises the question: why do firms that emphasize efficiency and competitiveness shy away from models that could enhance these very attributes?
One explanation highlights risk aversion, large firms, having invested heavily in existing systems, are reluctant to disrupt operations with uncertain outcomes. Another perspective focuses on accountability concerns, suggesting that upper management prefers clear chains of command to minimize errors and ensure uniformity. A third view posits that while firms may experiment with decentralization in certain departments, piecemeal adoption dilutes the potential benefits of full-scale transformation.
While each explanation addresses part of the issue, they share significant limitations. Risk aversion theories emphasize the potential for loss but underestimate the capacity for controlled risk-taking, which many firms exhibit in product development or market expansion. Accountability-based arguments overlook the reality that centralized systems can suffer from bureaucratic delays and reduced employee engagement. Lastly, the fragmented adoption argument tends to treat decentralization as a binary choice, neglecting the nuanced ways in which decision-making can evolve across different levels of the organization.
An alternative framework draws from behavioral economics, suggesting that the success or failure of decentralized initiatives hinges on incentive alignment and cultural readiness. Decentralization is not a matter of policy alone but is embedded in the firm’s ability to cultivate trust and establish clear performance metrics at every level. In effect, decentralization thrives when employees feel empowered but also understand the parameters within which they operate. Rather than being implemented uniformly, successful decentralization often involves targeted shifts, where leadership delegates responsibility progressively, fostering a culture of accountability and innovation simultaneously.
Thus, the resistance to decentralization may stem less from the model itself and more from the absence of structures that facilitate its smooth integration. Where decentralization efforts falter, the fault often lies not in the concept but in the failure to adapt managerial frameworks that can harness its potential.
The passage most strongly suggests that most firms aim to
A. reduce operational risk by maintaining centralized decision-making structures.
B. cultivate innovation by gradually adopting decentralized decision-making processes.
C. increase efficiency and competitiveness by choosing organizational structures they believe will support those goals.
D. establish clear chains of accountability to enhance performance.
E. improve overall performance through the adoption of effective organizational practices.
A) Incorrect. Risk control appears in the passage, yet the author introduces it as only one possible reason for keeping centralized structures. The overall discussion shows that firms place greatest weight on staying efficient and competitive, so risk reduction is not presented as the primary aim.
B) Incorrect. The passage observes that a few companies try decentralization in isolated departments. It also states that most large corporations continue to favor central control, which means a gradual shift toward decentralization is not their common strategy for fostering innovation.
C) Correct Answer. Early in the passage the author asks why companies that value “efficiency and competitiveness” often refuse to adopt models that might improve those very qualities. This question reveals the author’s view that firms pick whatever structure they think will support efficiency and competitiveness, whether that choice is centralization or decentralization.
D) Incorrect. Clear accountability is listed as a reason executives like centralization, but the author presents it as one factor among several. The passage does not imply that establishing clear accountability is the overarching goal pursued by most firms.
E) Incorrect. A general wish to improve overall performance applies to nearly any organization. The passage is more specific, repeatedly linking structural choices to the twin goals of efficiency and competitiveness rather than to performance in a broad sense.
Answer: C
05 Jun 2026, 09:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
I don’t quite agree with the solution. This seems wrong on many levels. The question stem asks "the passage suggests that most firms do?" Option C has a lot of assumption on the part of the reader as to what author meant when he said that "efficiency and competitiveness" are main focus and will pick whatever structure that supports it. Even if I take this explanation, the passage never says or implies that. The initial passage states that the "that the firms who value these 2 qualities, still stick to centralised control", implying that decentralised has more of these qualities. and after that too, the stem asks what the firms agree with, and the passage clearly states option A (no need for imagination as to what must author mean.)
