Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
14 Oct 2025, 23:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
When the British architect Michael Ventris announced in 1952 that he had deciphered Linear B, the mysterious script found on clay tablets from Bronze Age Greece, his discovery did more than solve a linguistic puzzle. It disrupted long-standing assumptions about cultural descent and intellectual progress. Scholars had believed that Mycenaean civilization, the presumed origin of Greek culture, was illiterate; Ventris’s work revealed instead that its administrators wrote an early form of Greek centuries before Homer’s epics were composed. What appeared to be a narrow technical triumph thus altered an entire chronology of cultural development.
The decipherment of Linear B also transformed ideas about how meaning itself is recovered from silence. Earlier efforts to decode lost scripts, such as those preceding the Rosetta Stone’s unlocking of Egyptian hieroglyphs, had assumed that decipherment was primarily a mechanical exercise: match symbols to sounds, and language would yield its secrets. Ventris’s approach, in contrast, combined linguistic reasoning with archaeological inference, using contextual clues such as place names, economic inventories, and administrative patterns to hypothesize what kinds of words the tablets might contain. His success suggested that language reconstruction is not a single act of translation but a process of historical empathy, an attempt to inhabit the intellectual world of its creators.
Yet the Linear B episode also cautioned against overconfidence. Once scholars could read the tablets, they discovered that the texts consisted mainly of accounting records, meticulous tallies of grain, livestock, and labor. The grandeur of a vanished civilization, newly made legible, reduced itself to lists and quotas. In that sense, decipherment paradoxically diminished the imaginative aura surrounding the Mycenaeans, replacing mythic speculation with bureaucratic fact.
What the rediscovery of lost languages ultimately reveals is that knowledge does not merely accumulate; it reconfigures the questions we ask. The decipherer’s triumph lies not simply in recovering words, but in redefining what counts as understanding. To translate the past, one must first translate one’s own expectations of it, and that, as every archaeologist of meaning eventually learns, is the most elusive code of all.
The author of the passage would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
A. Genuine understanding of the past depends as much on reinterpreting modern assumptions as on recovering ancient facts.
B. The true measure of intellectual progress lies in replacing mythic imagination with verifiable data.
C. The Mycenaean civilization was the earliest Greek civilization to leave behind written records.
D. The fact that the Linear B tablets held administrative rather than poetic material increased the historical importance of Ventris’s decipherment.
E. The decipherment of Linear B would have been impossible without combining linguistic reasoning with archaeological context.
The decipherment of Linear B also transformed ideas about how meaning itself is recovered from silence. Earlier efforts to decode lost scripts, such as those preceding the Rosetta Stone’s unlocking of Egyptian hieroglyphs, had assumed that decipherment was primarily a mechanical exercise: match symbols to sounds, and language would yield its secrets. Ventris’s approach, in contrast, combined linguistic reasoning with archaeological inference, using contextual clues such as place names, economic inventories, and administrative patterns to hypothesize what kinds of words the tablets might contain. His success suggested that language reconstruction is not a single act of translation but a process of historical empathy, an attempt to inhabit the intellectual world of its creators.
Yet the Linear B episode also cautioned against overconfidence. Once scholars could read the tablets, they discovered that the texts consisted mainly of accounting records, meticulous tallies of grain, livestock, and labor. The grandeur of a vanished civilization, newly made legible, reduced itself to lists and quotas. In that sense, decipherment paradoxically diminished the imaginative aura surrounding the Mycenaeans, replacing mythic speculation with bureaucratic fact.
What the rediscovery of lost languages ultimately reveals is that knowledge does not merely accumulate; it reconfigures the questions we ask. The decipherer’s triumph lies not simply in recovering words, but in redefining what counts as understanding. To translate the past, one must first translate one’s own expectations of it, and that, as every archaeologist of meaning eventually learns, is the most elusive code of all.
The author of the passage would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
A. Genuine understanding of the past depends as much on reinterpreting modern assumptions as on recovering ancient facts.
B. The true measure of intellectual progress lies in replacing mythic imagination with verifiable data.
C. The Mycenaean civilization was the earliest Greek civilization to leave behind written records.
D. The fact that the Linear B tablets held administrative rather than poetic material increased the historical importance of Ventris’s decipherment.
E. The decipherment of Linear B would have been impossible without combining linguistic reasoning with archaeological context.
14 Oct 2025, 23:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
When the British architect Michael Ventris announced in 1952 that he had deciphered Linear B, the mysterious script found on clay tablets from Bronze Age Greece, his discovery did more than solve a linguistic puzzle. It disrupted long-standing assumptions about cultural descent and intellectual progress. Scholars had believed that Mycenaean civilization, the presumed origin of Greek culture, was illiterate; Ventris’s work revealed instead that its administrators wrote an early form of Greek centuries before Homer’s epics were composed. What appeared to be a narrow technical triumph thus altered an entire chronology of cultural development.
The decipherment of Linear B also transformed ideas about how meaning itself is recovered from silence. Earlier efforts to decode lost scripts, such as those preceding the Rosetta Stone’s unlocking of Egyptian hieroglyphs, had assumed that decipherment was primarily a mechanical exercise: match symbols to sounds, and language would yield its secrets. Ventris’s approach, in contrast, combined linguistic reasoning with archaeological inference, using contextual clues such as place names, economic inventories, and administrative patterns to hypothesize what kinds of words the tablets might contain. His success suggested that language reconstruction is not a single act of translation but a process of historical empathy, an attempt to inhabit the intellectual world of its creators.
Yet the Linear B episode also cautioned against overconfidence. Once scholars could read the tablets, they discovered that the texts consisted mainly of accounting records, meticulous tallies of grain, livestock, and labor. The grandeur of a vanished civilization, newly made legible, reduced itself to lists and quotas. In that sense, decipherment paradoxically diminished the imaginative aura surrounding the Mycenaeans, replacing mythic speculation with bureaucratic fact.
What the rediscovery of lost languages ultimately reveals is that knowledge does not merely accumulate; it reconfigures the questions we ask. The decipherer’s triumph lies not simply in recovering words, but in redefining what counts as understanding. To translate the past, one must first translate one’s own expectations of it, and that, as every archaeologist of meaning eventually learns, is the most elusive code of all.
The author of the passage would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
A. Genuine understanding of the past depends as much on reinterpreting modern assumptions as on recovering ancient facts.
B. The true measure of intellectual progress lies in replacing mythic imagination with verifiable data.
C. The Mycenaean civilization was the earliest Greek civilization to leave behind written records.
D. The fact that the Linear B tablets held administrative rather than poetic material increased the historical importance of Ventris’s decipherment.
E. The decipherment of Linear B would have been impossible without combining linguistic reasoning with archaeological context.
A) Correct Answer. The author writes that “knowledge does not merely accumulate; it reconfigures the questions we ask” and that a decipherer must “translate one’s own expectations.” These comments show that real insight comes from testing and revising modern assumptions as much as from uncovering ancient evidence.
B) Incorrect. The passage notes that the tablets turned out to be accounting lists and calls this discovery “paradoxical,” because it diminished the Mycenaeans’ imaginative aura. The author does not say that replacing myth with data is the main yardstick of progress.
C) Incorrect. Although Ventris proved the tablets contained early Greek and thus produced the earliest written records of that language, the author’s broader argument is about how decipherment reshapes understanding, not about dating milestones. The statement is factual but not singled out as a key lesson.
D) Incorrect. The author suggests that finding mostly administrative records lessened the romance of the civilization. This outcome did not increase the historical significance of the decipherment; if anything, it complicated its cultural impact.
E) Incorrect. The passage praises Ventris for mixing linguistic clues with archaeological context, yet it does not claim that no other method could have succeeded. Saying the task “would have been impossible” overstates the author’s position.
Answer: A
When the British architect Michael Ventris announced in 1952 that he had deciphered Linear B, the mysterious script found on clay tablets from Bronze Age Greece, his discovery did more than solve a linguistic puzzle. It disrupted long-standing assumptions about cultural descent and intellectual progress. Scholars had believed that Mycenaean civilization, the presumed origin of Greek culture, was illiterate; Ventris’s work revealed instead that its administrators wrote an early form of Greek centuries before Homer’s epics were composed. What appeared to be a narrow technical triumph thus altered an entire chronology of cultural development.
The decipherment of Linear B also transformed ideas about how meaning itself is recovered from silence. Earlier efforts to decode lost scripts, such as those preceding the Rosetta Stone’s unlocking of Egyptian hieroglyphs, had assumed that decipherment was primarily a mechanical exercise: match symbols to sounds, and language would yield its secrets. Ventris’s approach, in contrast, combined linguistic reasoning with archaeological inference, using contextual clues such as place names, economic inventories, and administrative patterns to hypothesize what kinds of words the tablets might contain. His success suggested that language reconstruction is not a single act of translation but a process of historical empathy, an attempt to inhabit the intellectual world of its creators.
Yet the Linear B episode also cautioned against overconfidence. Once scholars could read the tablets, they discovered that the texts consisted mainly of accounting records, meticulous tallies of grain, livestock, and labor. The grandeur of a vanished civilization, newly made legible, reduced itself to lists and quotas. In that sense, decipherment paradoxically diminished the imaginative aura surrounding the Mycenaeans, replacing mythic speculation with bureaucratic fact.
What the rediscovery of lost languages ultimately reveals is that knowledge does not merely accumulate; it reconfigures the questions we ask. The decipherer’s triumph lies not simply in recovering words, but in redefining what counts as understanding. To translate the past, one must first translate one’s own expectations of it, and that, as every archaeologist of meaning eventually learns, is the most elusive code of all.
The author of the passage would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
A. Genuine understanding of the past depends as much on reinterpreting modern assumptions as on recovering ancient facts.
B. The true measure of intellectual progress lies in replacing mythic imagination with verifiable data.
C. The Mycenaean civilization was the earliest Greek civilization to leave behind written records.
D. The fact that the Linear B tablets held administrative rather than poetic material increased the historical importance of Ventris’s decipherment.
E. The decipherment of Linear B would have been impossible without combining linguistic reasoning with archaeological context.
A) Correct Answer. The author writes that “knowledge does not merely accumulate; it reconfigures the questions we ask” and that a decipherer must “translate one’s own expectations.” These comments show that real insight comes from testing and revising modern assumptions as much as from uncovering ancient evidence.
B) Incorrect. The passage notes that the tablets turned out to be accounting lists and calls this discovery “paradoxical,” because it diminished the Mycenaeans’ imaginative aura. The author does not say that replacing myth with data is the main yardstick of progress.
C) Incorrect. Although Ventris proved the tablets contained early Greek and thus produced the earliest written records of that language, the author’s broader argument is about how decipherment reshapes understanding, not about dating milestones. The statement is factual but not singled out as a key lesson.
D) Incorrect. The author suggests that finding mostly administrative records lessened the romance of the civilization. This outcome did not increase the historical significance of the decipherment; if anything, it complicated its cultural impact.
E) Incorrect. The passage praises Ventris for mixing linguistic clues with archaeological context, yet it does not claim that no other method could have succeeded. Saying the task “would have been impossible” overstates the author’s position.
Answer: A
