|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
04 Feb 2026, 22:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
By the early twentieth century, the gold standard had become a cornerstone of the international financial system. Under this arrangement, currencies were convertible into a fixed quantity of gold, anchoring exchange rates and constraining governments from expanding the money supply beyond their reserves. The system’s defenders regarded this rigidity as a safeguard against political interference and fiscal irresponsibility. In their view, the discipline imposed by gold convertibility maintained both domestic price stability and global confidence, even if it limited short-term flexibility.
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
If the author were to analyze a modern economic bloc that shares a common currency, which aspect would most likely concern the author based on the passage?
A. the long-term inflationary effects of maintaining a single currency across multiple economies
B. the possibility that member states could collectively devalue their currency during economic crises
C. the difficulty of coordinating fiscal policies among nations with similar economic conditions
D. the potential loss of monetary flexibility among member nations during economic downturns
E. the price stability and global confidence that a uniform currency can promote
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
If the author were to analyze a modern economic bloc that shares a common currency, which aspect would most likely concern the author based on the passage?
A. the long-term inflationary effects of maintaining a single currency across multiple economies
B. the possibility that member states could collectively devalue their currency during economic crises
C. the difficulty of coordinating fiscal policies among nations with similar economic conditions
D. the potential loss of monetary flexibility among member nations during economic downturns
E. the price stability and global confidence that a uniform currency can promote
04 Feb 2026, 22:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
By the early twentieth century, the gold standard had become a cornerstone of the international financial system. Under this arrangement, currencies were convertible into a fixed quantity of gold, anchoring exchange rates and constraining governments from expanding the money supply beyond their reserves. The system’s defenders regarded this rigidity as a safeguard against political interference and fiscal irresponsibility. In their view, the discipline imposed by gold convertibility maintained both domestic price stability and global confidence, even if it limited short-term flexibility.
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
If the author were to analyze a modern economic bloc that shares a common currency, which aspect would most likely concern the author based on the passage?
A. the long-term inflationary effects of maintaining a single currency across multiple economies
B. the possibility that member states could collectively devalue their currency during economic crises
C. the difficulty of coordinating fiscal policies among nations with similar economic conditions
D. the potential loss of monetary flexibility among member nations during economic downturns
E. the price stability and global confidence that a uniform currency can promote
A) Incorrect: The passage argues that the gold standard created deflationary pressures by preventing monetary expansion, implying that rigidity, not inflation, was the problem.
B) Incorrect: The author suggests that countries feared competitive devaluations under floating rates, but collective devaluation under a single currency is not mentioned. The concern is about limits to national action, not joint action.
C) Incorrect: The passage focuses on monetary policy and discusses central banks’ inability to cut interest rates or expand liquidity, not government spending decisions.
D) Correct: The passage repeatedly stresses that the gold standard “constrained governments from expanding the money supply” and that its “rigidity proved costly during the Great Depression.” A modern shared-currency system would raise the same issue: nations might lose the flexibility to adjust policy independently in a downturn.
E) Incorrect: The author’s perspective is critical of rigid benefits during crises. Price stability and confidence are presented as secondary advantages, not the author’s main concern.
Answer: D
By the early twentieth century, the gold standard had become a cornerstone of the international financial system. Under this arrangement, currencies were convertible into a fixed quantity of gold, anchoring exchange rates and constraining governments from expanding the money supply beyond their reserves. The system’s defenders regarded this rigidity as a safeguard against political interference and fiscal irresponsibility. In their view, the discipline imposed by gold convertibility maintained both domestic price stability and global confidence, even if it limited short-term flexibility.
That discipline proved costly during the Great Depression. When economic activity contracted sharply after 1929, central banks faced mounting pressure to cut interest rates and inject liquidity. Yet countries that remained tied to gold hesitated to act, fearing depletion of reserves and loss of credibility. The result was a deflationary spiral that deepened unemployment and curtailed investment. Nations that abandoned gold earlier, notably Britain in 1931, recovered more quickly than those that persisted, including France and the United States. What had once been a symbol of prudence came to be viewed as an obstacle to recovery.
The reasons for that persistence remain debated. Some historians attribute it to ideological commitment- an unwillingness to relinquish what was seen as the foundation of monetary order. Others emphasize practical concerns: policymakers feared that floating exchange rates would invite competitive devaluations and international discord. Whatever the motive, adherence to the gold standard transmitted economic distress across borders, transforming local recessions into a global depression.
The system’s collapse in the 1930s marked a decisive turning point in economic thought. Governments grew more willing to use monetary and fiscal tools to stabilize demand, while economists questioned whether automatic monetary rules could ever accommodate large shocks. Still, the appeal of fixed standards has endured. Periodic calls for a return to monetary discipline reflect an unresolved tension in economic policy- the search for stability through constraint versus the need for flexibility in crisis.
If the author were to analyze a modern economic bloc that shares a common currency, which aspect would most likely concern the author based on the passage?
A. the long-term inflationary effects of maintaining a single currency across multiple economies
B. the possibility that member states could collectively devalue their currency during economic crises
C. the difficulty of coordinating fiscal policies among nations with similar economic conditions
D. the potential loss of monetary flexibility among member nations during economic downturns
E. the price stability and global confidence that a uniform currency can promote
A) Incorrect: The passage argues that the gold standard created deflationary pressures by preventing monetary expansion, implying that rigidity, not inflation, was the problem.
B) Incorrect: The author suggests that countries feared competitive devaluations under floating rates, but collective devaluation under a single currency is not mentioned. The concern is about limits to national action, not joint action.
C) Incorrect: The passage focuses on monetary policy and discusses central banks’ inability to cut interest rates or expand liquidity, not government spending decisions.
D) Correct: The passage repeatedly stresses that the gold standard “constrained governments from expanding the money supply” and that its “rigidity proved costly during the Great Depression.” A modern shared-currency system would raise the same issue: nations might lose the flexibility to adjust policy independently in a downturn.
E) Incorrect: The author’s perspective is critical of rigid benefits during crises. Price stability and confidence are presented as secondary advantages, not the author’s main concern.
Answer: D
