Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
26 May 2024, 14:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
The revered principle of delayed gratification—postponing immediate pleasures for future benefits—is scrutinized for its potential excesses. This concept manifests in what is termed the "specialness spiral," a behavioral pattern where ordinary items are saved for so-called special occasions, resulting in their continual non-use. This cycle initiates when individuals opt to defer gratification, subsequently enhancing the item's perceived value and specialty, making it even less likely to be used routinely. Over time, this leads to a paradox where possessions are perpetually reserved for the perfect moment—a moment that might never arrive.
This phenomenon has broader implications on personal well-being. By consistently postponing the enjoyment of purchases and experiences, individuals may not only miss out on immediate pleasures but also contribute to environmental waste and accumulate unnecessary clutter. This could escalate to hoarding behavior. The habit of waiting for the ideal circumstances—such as the perfect mood or the right timing—often prevents people from engaging in self-care activities, which are shown to be particularly beneficial during stressful periods. Experiments demonstrate that individuals constrained by time or resources, who nonetheless engage in small indulgences, report significant boosts in well-being, challenging the rationale behind postponement.
Additionally, the research explored the psychology of reservation through a series of experiments where participants reacted to hypothetical scenarios involving the use of an ordinary bottle of wine. Those who imagined delaying its opening once deemed the wine too special for casual occasions and were less likely to open it subsequently. This outcome was consistent across various scenarios, reinforcing the notion that even a single act of deferment can escalate the perceived specialness of an item, fueling further delays.
Thus, while planning and saving are undoubtedly valuable, the propensity to excessively defer gratification can obstruct the enjoyment of life's simpler joys, suggesting a need for a more balanced approach between prudence for the future and relishing the present. This balance is crucial for enhancing life quality and achieving a state of contentment and fulfillment.
What can be inferred about the individuals who defer self-care activities according to the passage?
A. They are more likely to experience lower stress levels over time.
B. They might not fully appreciate the potential benefits of self-care during stressful periods.
C. They are generally more careful with their financial resources.
D. They are better at planning for future events and responsibilities.
E. They prefer to engage in self-care activities in non-stressful periods.
This phenomenon has broader implications on personal well-being. By consistently postponing the enjoyment of purchases and experiences, individuals may not only miss out on immediate pleasures but also contribute to environmental waste and accumulate unnecessary clutter. This could escalate to hoarding behavior. The habit of waiting for the ideal circumstances—such as the perfect mood or the right timing—often prevents people from engaging in self-care activities, which are shown to be particularly beneficial during stressful periods. Experiments demonstrate that individuals constrained by time or resources, who nonetheless engage in small indulgences, report significant boosts in well-being, challenging the rationale behind postponement.
Additionally, the research explored the psychology of reservation through a series of experiments where participants reacted to hypothetical scenarios involving the use of an ordinary bottle of wine. Those who imagined delaying its opening once deemed the wine too special for casual occasions and were less likely to open it subsequently. This outcome was consistent across various scenarios, reinforcing the notion that even a single act of deferment can escalate the perceived specialness of an item, fueling further delays.
Thus, while planning and saving are undoubtedly valuable, the propensity to excessively defer gratification can obstruct the enjoyment of life's simpler joys, suggesting a need for a more balanced approach between prudence for the future and relishing the present. This balance is crucial for enhancing life quality and achieving a state of contentment and fulfillment.
What can be inferred about the individuals who defer self-care activities according to the passage?
A. They are more likely to experience lower stress levels over time.
B. They might not fully appreciate the potential benefits of self-care during stressful periods.
C. They are generally more careful with their financial resources.
D. They are better at planning for future events and responsibilities.
E. They prefer to engage in self-care activities in non-stressful periods.
26 May 2024, 14:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
The revered principle of delayed gratification—postponing immediate pleasures for future benefits—is scrutinized for its potential excesses. This concept manifests in what is termed the "specialness spiral," a behavioral pattern where ordinary items are saved for so-called special occasions, resulting in their continual non-use. This cycle initiates when individuals opt to defer gratification, subsequently enhancing the item's perceived value and specialty, making it even less likely to be used routinely. Over time, this leads to a paradox where possessions are perpetually reserved for the perfect moment—a moment that might never arrive.
This phenomenon has broader implications on personal well-being. By consistently postponing the enjoyment of purchases and experiences, individuals may not only miss out on immediate pleasures but also contribute to environmental waste and accumulate unnecessary clutter. This could escalate to hoarding behavior. The habit of waiting for the ideal circumstances—such as the perfect mood or the right timing—often prevents people from engaging in self-care activities, which are shown to be particularly beneficial during stressful periods. Experiments demonstrate that individuals constrained by time or resources, who nonetheless engage in small indulgences, report significant boosts in well-being, challenging the rationale behind postponement.
Additionally, the research explored the psychology of reservation through a series of experiments where participants reacted to hypothetical scenarios involving the use of an ordinary bottle of wine. Those who imagined delaying its opening once deemed the wine too special for casual occasions and were less likely to open it subsequently. This outcome was consistent across various scenarios, reinforcing the notion that even a single act of deferment can escalate the perceived specialness of an item, fueling further delays.
Thus, while planning and saving are undoubtedly valuable, the propensity to excessively defer gratification can obstruct the enjoyment of life's simpler joys, suggesting a need for a more balanced approach between prudence for the future and relishing the present. This balance is crucial for enhancing life quality and achieving a state of contentment and fulfillment.
What can be inferred about the individuals who defer self-care activities according to the passage?
A. They are more likely to experience lower stress levels over time.
B. They might not fully appreciate the potential benefits of self-care during stressful periods.
C. They are generally more careful with their financial resources.
D. They are better at planning for future events and responsibilities.
E. They prefer to engage in self-care activities in non-stressful periods.
Correct Answer: B) They might not fully appreciate the potential benefits of self-care during stressful periods.
The passage discusses how individuals, particularly those feeling constrained by time or other resources, tend to postpone self-care activities. However, it also highlights that these activities are especially beneficial during such stressful times. The correct inference is that these individuals may not realize or fully appreciate how beneficial these activities could be to their well-being in stressful situations.
A) They are more likely to experience lower stress levels over time.
This choice is incorrect because the passage actually suggests the opposite. Those who engage in self-care activities, even when time-constrained, report significant boosts in well-being, implying that deferring these activities likely does not lead to lower stress levels.
C) They are generally more careful with their financial resources.
There is no information in the passage linking the deferral of self-care to financial carefulness. The reasons for postponing self-care seem more related to time constraints and not fully recognizing the benefits, rather than financial caution.
D) They are better at planning for future events and responsibilities.
The passage does not suggest that deferring self-care is linked to better planning abilities. Instead, it indicates that even those who are pressed for time benefit from self-care, which contradicts the idea that such deferral is a result of better planning.
E) They prefer to engage in self-care activities in non-stressful periods.
This choice assumes a preference that is not supported by the passage. The text suggests that deferring self-care is due to undervaluing its immediate benefits during stress, not a preference for engaging in these activities during calmer periods.
Answer: B
The revered principle of delayed gratification—postponing immediate pleasures for future benefits—is scrutinized for its potential excesses. This concept manifests in what is termed the "specialness spiral," a behavioral pattern where ordinary items are saved for so-called special occasions, resulting in their continual non-use. This cycle initiates when individuals opt to defer gratification, subsequently enhancing the item's perceived value and specialty, making it even less likely to be used routinely. Over time, this leads to a paradox where possessions are perpetually reserved for the perfect moment—a moment that might never arrive.
This phenomenon has broader implications on personal well-being. By consistently postponing the enjoyment of purchases and experiences, individuals may not only miss out on immediate pleasures but also contribute to environmental waste and accumulate unnecessary clutter. This could escalate to hoarding behavior. The habit of waiting for the ideal circumstances—such as the perfect mood or the right timing—often prevents people from engaging in self-care activities, which are shown to be particularly beneficial during stressful periods. Experiments demonstrate that individuals constrained by time or resources, who nonetheless engage in small indulgences, report significant boosts in well-being, challenging the rationale behind postponement.
Additionally, the research explored the psychology of reservation through a series of experiments where participants reacted to hypothetical scenarios involving the use of an ordinary bottle of wine. Those who imagined delaying its opening once deemed the wine too special for casual occasions and were less likely to open it subsequently. This outcome was consistent across various scenarios, reinforcing the notion that even a single act of deferment can escalate the perceived specialness of an item, fueling further delays.
Thus, while planning and saving are undoubtedly valuable, the propensity to excessively defer gratification can obstruct the enjoyment of life's simpler joys, suggesting a need for a more balanced approach between prudence for the future and relishing the present. This balance is crucial for enhancing life quality and achieving a state of contentment and fulfillment.
What can be inferred about the individuals who defer self-care activities according to the passage?
A. They are more likely to experience lower stress levels over time.
B. They might not fully appreciate the potential benefits of self-care during stressful periods.
C. They are generally more careful with their financial resources.
D. They are better at planning for future events and responsibilities.
E. They prefer to engage in self-care activities in non-stressful periods.
Correct Answer: B) They might not fully appreciate the potential benefits of self-care during stressful periods.
The passage discusses how individuals, particularly those feeling constrained by time or other resources, tend to postpone self-care activities. However, it also highlights that these activities are especially beneficial during such stressful times. The correct inference is that these individuals may not realize or fully appreciate how beneficial these activities could be to their well-being in stressful situations.
A) They are more likely to experience lower stress levels over time.
This choice is incorrect because the passage actually suggests the opposite. Those who engage in self-care activities, even when time-constrained, report significant boosts in well-being, implying that deferring these activities likely does not lead to lower stress levels.
C) They are generally more careful with their financial resources.
There is no information in the passage linking the deferral of self-care to financial carefulness. The reasons for postponing self-care seem more related to time constraints and not fully recognizing the benefits, rather than financial caution.
D) They are better at planning for future events and responsibilities.
The passage does not suggest that deferring self-care is linked to better planning abilities. Instead, it indicates that even those who are pressed for time benefit from self-care, which contradicts the idea that such deferral is a result of better planning.
E) They prefer to engage in self-care activities in non-stressful periods.
This choice assumes a preference that is not supported by the passage. The text suggests that deferring self-care is due to undervaluing its immediate benefits during stress, not a preference for engaging in these activities during calmer periods.
Answer: B
28 Jul 2024, 07:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
