Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
12 Aug 2024, 09:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
A. Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
B. Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
C. Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
D. The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
E. Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
A. Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
B. Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
C. Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
D. The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
E. Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
12 Aug 2024, 09:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
A. Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
B. Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
C. Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
D. The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
E. Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
Correct Answer: C. Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
If tech companies stimulate local economies through high demand for skilled labor and boost secondary employment, it naturally follows that in regions where these companies are densely concentrated, there will be a greater creation of jobs, both skilled and in the supporting industries. This is a pretty simple logical conclusion: companies create jobs, therefore more companies results into more jobs.
(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
It is not a guaranteed outcome. Not all regions may have the necessary conditions for this economic stimulation (like available skilled labor or infrastructure), making it a presumption rather than a certainty. There are reasons why tech companies concentrate in some regions rather than others.
(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
This statement presumes that incentives alone will lead to lower unemployment rates, but there is no guarantee that tech companies will actually come to the region, open an office, and hire people. Incentives alone cannot guarantee it, though they may stimulate it. Eliminate.
(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
This choice is too extreme by using "always," which is too absolute and does not account for possible exceptions where tech companies might not improve the economy, possibly due to mismatched industry needs and local resources or during a tech crisis such as a dot com bust in 2000’s. Answer choices with “Always” in them will “usually” be wrong as they are too extreme. Eliminate.
(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
This answer introduces an idea about the lack of skilled labor, which was not mentioned in the initial statements. We do not know what kind of labor composition is in the economically depressed regions. Possibly that may be true that there is a lack of skilled labor but how would government incentives help with skilled labor? That's really a shot in the dark. There is no way to prove that 2 of these statements bundled into one are true. Eliminate.
Answer: C
In a recent government report, it was found that regions with a higher density of tech companies tend to have lower unemployment rates. The report suggests that the presence of these tech companies stimulates local economies by creating a high demand for skilled labor, which not only provides jobs within these companies but also boosts secondary employment in supporting industries. Based on this, the government is considering incentives to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
A. Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
B. Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
C. Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
D. The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
E. Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
Correct Answer: C. Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries.
If tech companies stimulate local economies through high demand for skilled labor and boost secondary employment, it naturally follows that in regions where these companies are densely concentrated, there will be a greater creation of jobs, both skilled and in the supporting industries. This is a pretty simple logical conclusion: companies create jobs, therefore more companies results into more jobs.
(A) Regions without a high density of tech companies will benefit from similar economic stimulation if tech companies are introduced there.
It is not a guaranteed outcome. Not all regions may have the necessary conditions for this economic stimulation (like available skilled labor or infrastructure), making it a presumption rather than a certainty. There are reasons why tech companies concentrate in some regions rather than others.
(B) Incentives to attract tech companies to economically depressed regions will significantly lower the unemployment rates in those regions.
This statement presumes that incentives alone will lead to lower unemployment rates, but there is no guarantee that tech companies will actually come to the region, open an office, and hire people. Incentives alone cannot guarantee it, though they may stimulate it. Eliminate.
(D) The overall economy of a region is always improved by the presence of tech companies.
This choice is too extreme by using "always," which is too absolute and does not account for possible exceptions where tech companies might not improve the economy, possibly due to mismatched industry needs and local resources or during a tech crisis such as a dot com bust in 2000’s. Answer choices with “Always” in them will “usually” be wrong as they are too extreme. Eliminate.
(E) Regions that are economically depressed lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies without government incentives.
This answer introduces an idea about the lack of skilled labor, which was not mentioned in the initial statements. We do not know what kind of labor composition is in the economically depressed regions. Possibly that may be true that there is a lack of skilled labor but how would government incentives help with skilled labor? That's really a shot in the dark. There is no way to prove that 2 of these statements bundled into one are true. Eliminate.
Answer: C
30 Aug 2024, 20:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Option E negated: Regions that are economically depressed DONOT lack the skilled labor necessary to support the influx of tech companies "without government incentives"
Negating Option E breaks the conclusion that - Based on this, the "government is considering incentives" to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions
If the depressed regions had skilled labour, "incentives" to support influx of tech companies would not be necessary. Option E justifies the role of incentives in the whole system whereas looking at Option C
"Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries"
Negated option C - Tech companies DONOT tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated despite increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries
which regions? No clarity. Role of incentives? how does this break the conclusion that incentives are needed for depressed regions?
Negating Option E breaks the conclusion that - Based on this, the "government is considering incentives" to attract more tech companies to economically depressed regions
If the depressed regions had skilled labour, "incentives" to support influx of tech companies would not be necessary. Option E justifies the role of incentives in the whole system whereas looking at Option C
"Tech companies tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated due to increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries"
Negated option C - Tech companies DONOT tend to create more jobs in regions where they are concentrated despite increased demand for skilled labor and supporting industries
which regions? No clarity. Role of incentives? how does this break the conclusion that incentives are needed for depressed regions?
