Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1912:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep....
May 2008:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
What’s in it for you- Live Profile Evaluation Chat Session with Jenifer Turtschanow, CEO, ARINGO. Come with your details prepared and ARINGO will share insights! Pre-MBA Role/Industry, YOE, Exam Score, C/GPA, ECs Post-MBA Role/ Industry & School List.
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
02 Jul 2021, 19:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
So, imagine you get a CR passage which starts off with telling you how people who move to coastal cities tend to find employment faster than before. The passage concludes by saying places (such as NY and LA) must therefore have better employment opportunities.
How do you perceive that sort of argument? An actual OG passage may be a little more complex and may not make it so clear, but if you can note that all this is basically saying is that:
situation A was followed by situation B
Therefore A caused B.
What GMAT alarm bell should be ringing? Well, one would be that A does not necessarily have to cause B. Perhaps such people are more motivated to find employment in a new city.
The point is not whether this is actually true or not. It's recognizing that on the GMAT this is a familiar type of answer choice you'll see thrown your way. The next time you see a CAUSATION passage, perhaps you'll be more hyper sensitive to it!
All the best.
How do you perceive that sort of argument? An actual OG passage may be a little more complex and may not make it so clear, but if you can note that all this is basically saying is that:
situation A was followed by situation B
Therefore A caused B.
What GMAT alarm bell should be ringing? Well, one would be that A does not necessarily have to cause B. Perhaps such people are more motivated to find employment in a new city.
The point is not whether this is actually true or not. It's recognizing that on the GMAT this is a familiar type of answer choice you'll see thrown your way. The next time you see a CAUSATION passage, perhaps you'll be more hyper sensitive to it!
All the best.
Moderators:
201 posts
