hamm0
I used
MGMAT books as self-study, as suggested, but was unable to reach my target score. I don't believe this was an issue with the books, but rather self-study. It was hard to focus after 10+hr days at work.
In my most recent attempt, I took an in-person class with Veritas, and got a 690. I thought the books were similar to
MGMAT's (that is to say, both are excellent), but the in-person class was really what helped put me over the top. I chose Veritas for the simple reason that it was offered locally, and
MGMAT was not.
I know this review won't help you decide between the two, assuming both courses are offered locally for you, but at least it is a data point. It is my belief that they are both great classes and sets of books, so really, you can't go wrong.
Hope this helps.
Hi Hamm - thanks for the quick response. Much appreciated.
If
MGMAT had been offered in your location, do you know which you would have chosen?
Both Veritas and
MGMAT are offered where I live, so I'm stuck in a dilemma. Veritas is quite a bit more than
MGMAT, but money isn't really an issue. My thought process is that perhaps
MGMAT might be the better option, and if I'm still left with questions, I can hire a private tutor, which could still, potentially, come out less than Veritas. I'm drawn by the 9 extra hours of class time with Veritas though. And the session is shorter, so I could tackle an actual GMAT sooner.
Most comparisons between the two programs date from 2010 or previously. It's a tough call to say the least.