Hello all,
first of all sorry if I picked the wrong section or made some mistake, I'm new. Anyway, I'm going to have the test in a couple of weeks (I have yet to book it, but it's not going to be after the 16th or 17th), doing only quant and verbal. My maths is very, very rusty, as it has always been my weakest area even in high school, and after that I pretty much never had to deal with geometry, problems and the like of that again. I've started preparing slightly more than a couple weeks ago, first with the Economist Tutor (doing only quant), then following the one-month study schedule made by
Magoosh, and I am today in the first day of the third week, having done both maths and verbal. In my prep tests, at least those after the very first (which was not even a CAT), I always had a better score on verbal, so I tried to focus my prep on quant, but the results have been pretty curious:
-over three weeks ago, with The Economist Tutor, a 530 (can't recall the actual scores, like 30 percentile in Q and 60/70 V);
-in the Kaplan test, around two weeks ago, I got a 590 (Q30th percentile, V94th);
-in the GMATPrep, last Sunday, I got a 690 (Q42 57th percentile, V41 93rd percentile);
-in the ManhattanPrep, yesterday, after another math-intensive week, I got a 680 (Q37, 40th; V45, 99th).
I understand Manhattan features a harder math than the actual test, but still improving in the area I practice the least and getting worse in the one I work hard on is confusing.
My target is to break 700, after that it's all bonus. Do you guys think I have a good shot at it? Can you help me figure out how to spend these last 2 weeks? Should I keep following the whole schedule, dump verbal for more maths, or change schedule altogether? On a sidenote, if I were to score exactly like the
Manhattan prep, would univerities view in any particular way the fact my score is twice as good on V than on Q? I heard usually it's the opposite.
Thanks in advance