HI erikvm,
Since CR prompts can only be so wordy, the information that is provided is almost always going to involve a 'logic pattern' of some kind.
Here's an example of a common pattern that GMAT questions writers use:
'Causality' is the idea that "one thing causes another"
eg. I ate healthier food, so I lost weight
It's actually quite common to be asked to STRENGTHEN or WEAKEN a causal argument. This tests your ability to "identify" the logic/argument AND correctly strengthen/weaken it.
In the above example, if we were trying to WEAKEN the idea that eating healthier food leads to weight loss, then there are 3 major ways to do so:
1) Offer evidence that something ELSE caused the weight loss (not the healthier food; maybe it was because of exercise).
2) Offer evidence that the ORDER of events is reversed (losing weight led to eating healthier).
3) Offer evidence that the events are NOT related (one did not cause the other; they both just happened at the same time).
These patterns, and others, appear consistently on Test Day, so part of your training should include building up your knowledge of these patterns AND your training to spot them when these same patterns occur.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich