Hi everyone,
I have been spending over 80 hours on preparing just the Verbal section so far, covering all SC and half of CR sections in e-gmat. As I was trying to use the approach suggested by e-gmat to solve CR questions, I felt that I would never have enough time to solve a question using their CR approach. For those who don't know their approach yet, I summarize it for you here.
- Step 1: Read, understand the passage, and figure out the main point of the author. (this is essential no matter what approach you take)
- Step 2: Pre-thinking step that involves laying out all possible assumptions you can think of from the passage.
- Step 3: Read, understand the question and answer choices.
I think the problem starts in the 2nd step. Although , this step intuitively reasonable. However, as there are so many ways to look at the facts presented in the passage, and as it is sometimes vague which real-world knowledge we have to pretend we don't know to be able to look at presented facts and opinions in the passage correctly. I feel like we can draw a lot more assumptions that needed to answer such question, jacking up our timing considerably. Furthermore, they also suggest that we do these steps before reading the question. Wouldn't it be better to know which type of CR question is this so we know what details we should pay more attention while reading and understanding the passage?
When doing the CR quizzes, I do the followings:
- Step 1: Read, understand the passage, and figure out the main point of the author.
- Step 2: Read and understand the question, figure out what type of CR question is this.
- Step 3: Read the answer choices and apply its idea to the concept of the passage.
What do you guys think?
Can you please share your experience and maybe your approach to CR questions?
Really appreciated your inputs.
Thank you