Last visit was: 19 May 2026, 00:29 It is currently 19 May 2026, 00:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
amitkumar2019
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 04 Sep 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 25
Kudos: 8
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 4,716
Own Kudos:
37,997
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4,978
Posts: 4,716
Kudos: 37,997
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Mar 2026
Posts: 839
Own Kudos:
2,726
 [2]
Given Kudos: 269
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 839
Kudos: 2,726
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
amitkumar2019
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 04 Sep 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 25
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you carcass and Gladiator59 for the replies. I've gone through the GMAT Quant book and I found it to be very very concise. For example, the formulae to get the number of factors of a particular integer is given without any explanation on how the formulae was arrived at. I need a book that will take me from the basics to the advanced level with sufficient examples, explanations and practice questions. My only concern at the moment is that I don't want to spend time learning concepts that are irrelevant to the GMAT.
User avatar
cfc198
User avatar
CAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 12 Apr 2020
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Posts: 261
Kudos: 836
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amitkumar2019
For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry- Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.

Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?

The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus?

I had this same question a few days ago and then later realized that this forum should be my only source for concepts AND practice. I would recommend you to stick with the gmatclub books for quants and to skim the manhattan guides from time to time.
User avatar
CAMANISHPARMAR
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Last visit: 13 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,016
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 1,016
Kudos: 2,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amitkumar2019
For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry- Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.

Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?

The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus?

You may alos consider doing the Quant mocks:-

https://gmatclub.com/tests-beta/?fl=menu

Whenever you come across a new question which you could not solve then there is definitely a takeaway from these questions!! Make a note of your learnings!! This will surely boost your confidence.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 6,105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 742
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,105
Kudos: 5,143
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amitkumar2019
For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry- Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.

Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?

The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus?
There is no official "GMAT syllabus" as such, but the GMAT is quite limited in terms of what it tests. One way to check whether you have done enough is to check how many times you are unable to solve a (preferably official) question (or solve it in time) because you were not aware of the concept(s) being tested.
avatar
amitkumar2019
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 04 Sep 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 25
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CAMANISHPARMAR
amitkumar2019
For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry- Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.

Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?

The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus?

You may alos consider doing the Quant mocks:-

https://gmatclub.com/tests-beta/?fl=menu

Whenever you come across a new question which you could not solve then there is definitely a takeaway from these questions!! Make a note of your learnings!! This will surely boost your confidence.

I do intend to do to purchase the GMAT Club Tests but that would be once I've reached the Q46 level in my mocks. For the beginner, I think, the GMAT Club tests would be quite intimidating :roll:
avatar
amitkumar2019
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 04 Sep 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 25
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
amitkumar2019
For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry- Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.

Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?

The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus?
There is no official "GMAT syllabus" as such, but the GMAT is quite limited in terms of what it tests. One way to check whether you have done enough is to check how many times you are unable to solve a (preferably official) question (or solve it in time) because you were not aware of the concept(s) being tested.

In the last few days I've contacted a number of my friends - those who've given the GMAT earlier and those who're preparing for it. According to them, the Geometry concepts that I referred to in my question - Incentre, Orthocentre, Centroid, Basic Proportionality Theorem etc are outside the ambit of the GMAT. Thank you for the tip AjiteshArun, makes a lot of sense. :cool:
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 6,105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 742
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,105
Kudos: 5,143
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amitkumar2019
In the last few days I've contacted a number of my friends - those who've given the GMAT earlier and those who're preparing for it. According to them, the Geometry concepts that I referred to in my question - Incentre, Orthocentre, Centroid, Basic Proportionality Theorem etc are outside the ambit of the GMAT. Thank you for the tip AjiteshArun, makes a lot of sense. :cool:
My pleasure.

After a few weeks, you yourself will be someone that others reach out to for answers to such questions :thumbup:
Moderators:
201 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
474 posts