January 19, 2019 January 19, 2019 07:00 AM PST 09:00 AM PST Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT. January 20, 2019 January 20, 2019 07:00 AM PST 07:00 AM PST Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
Author 
Message 
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 15

Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2018, 10:08
For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.
Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?
The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus?



Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3281

Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2018, 10:24



Senior PS Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 656

Re: Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2018, 10:29
If I were you I would take the advice carcass gave and run with it. Also, a pro tip would be to get the GMAT Club math book printed ( one side per page) and use the other blank side to keep making important pointers from all the badass questions ( 700 level and above) from Bunuel 's signature (Not to mention a ton loads from carcass's signature as well) I wish I knew what you do now at the start of my GMAT Quant journey. All the best. Regards, Gladi
_________________
Regards, Gladi
“Do. Or do not. There is no try.”  Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)



Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 15

Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2018, 10:45
Thank you carcass and Gladiator59 for the replies. I've gone through the GMAT Quant book and I found it to be very very concise. For example, the formulae to get the number of factors of a particular integer is given without any explanation on how the formulae was arrived at. I need a book that will take me from the basics to the advanced level with sufficient examples, explanations and practice questions. My only concern at the moment is that I don't want to spend time learning concepts that are irrelevant to the GMAT.



Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 62
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy

Re: Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2018, 10:47
amitkumar2019 wrote: For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.
Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?
The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus? I had this same question a few days ago and then later realized that this forum should be my only source for concepts AND practice. I would recommend you to stick with the gmatclub books for quants and to skim the manhattan guides from time to time.



Director
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 674

Re: Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2018, 08:45
amitkumar2019 wrote: For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.
Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?
The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus? You may alos consider doing the Quant mocks: https://gmatclub.com/testsbeta/?fl=menuWhenever you come across a new question which you could not solve then there is definitely a takeaway from these questions!! Make a note of your learnings!! This will surely boost your confidence.
_________________
"Please hit +1 Kudos if you like this post"
_________________ Manish
"Only I can change my life. No one can do it for me"



SVP
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 2009
Location: India

Re: Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2018, 11:22
amitkumar2019 wrote: For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.
Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?
The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus? There is no official "GMAT syllabus" as such, but the GMAT is quite limited in terms of what it tests. One way to check whether you have done enough is to check how many times you are unable to solve a (preferably official) question (or solve it in time) because you were not aware of the concept(s) being tested.
_________________
Ascore Prep  Live Online



Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 15

Re: Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2018, 16:34
CAMANISHPARMAR wrote: amitkumar2019 wrote: For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.
Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?
The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus? You may alos consider doing the Quant mocks: https://gmatclub.com/testsbeta/?fl=menuWhenever you come across a new question which you could not solve then there is definitely a takeaway from these questions!! Make a note of your learnings!! This will surely boost your confidence. I do intend to do to purchase the GMAT Club Tests but that would be once I've reached the Q46 level in my mocks. For the beginner, I think, the GMAT Club tests would be quite intimidating



Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 15

Re: Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2018, 16:40
AjiteshArun wrote: amitkumar2019 wrote: For the last few weeks I've been going through the study material of various GMAT test prep companies (mostly India based). Having gone through the Manhattan guides I noticed that there are many concepts in these study materials that aren't present in the Manhattan guides. To name a few in Geometry Basic Proportionality theorem, Angle Bisector Theorem, Cyclic Quadrilateral, Centroid, Medians etc are not present in the Manhattan guides.
Most of the concepts discussed by Brunuel in the Math Triangles thread are missing from the Manhattan Guides. Can someone please bring clarity to this point? What is the point in spending money to buy the Manhattan guides if they're missing more than half the information?
The larger point however is, how does one confirm if a particular concept is part of the GMAT syllabus? There is no official "GMAT syllabus" as such, but the GMAT is quite limited in terms of what it tests. One way to check whether you have done enough is to check how many times you are unable to solve a (preferably official) question (or solve it in time) because you were not aware of the concept(s) being tested. In the last few days I've contacted a number of my friends  those who've given the GMAT earlier and those who're preparing for it. According to them, the Geometry concepts that I referred to in my question  Incentre, Orthocentre, Centroid, Basic Proportionality Theorem etc are outside the ambit of the GMAT. Thank you for the tip AjiteshArun, makes a lot of sense.



SVP
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 2009
Location: India

Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2018, 22:36
amitkumar2019 wrote: In the last few days I've contacted a number of my friends  those who've given the GMAT earlier and those who're preparing for it. According to them, the Geometry concepts that I referred to in my question  Incentre, Orthocentre, Centroid, Basic Proportionality Theorem etc are outside the ambit of the GMAT. Thank you for the tip AjiteshArun, makes a lot of sense. My pleasure. After a few weeks, you yourself will be someone that others reach out to for answers to such questions
_________________
Ascore Prep  Live Online




Different GMAT Quant Guides teaching different concepts? &nbs
[#permalink]
30 Dec 2018, 22:36






