Hello GMAT Clubbers,
I was typing this reply (actually this is just one small part of it that I will post here now) to one ongoing discussion that was locked in the meantime.
Of course, I could unlock original one, but there is no need to, some other people thought that conversation there heated, or some participants misbehaved.
Instead of that, just on pure facts and research I want to present some data and raise some questions, without mentioning names. (actually just one name

)
I have visited Manhattan page and checked all tutors, all 77 of them, we are talking here about one tutor's peers/ex colleagues, with approximately same experience, here are stats among them, regarding perfect scores :
ACT 1
GRE 7
LSAT 1
GMAT 1
SAT 3
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/instructors/Now, here is the most important part (although I already expected that kind of distribution of perfect scores), we have one person with perfect ACT score, 7 instructors with perfect GRE score, one with perfect LSAT, one with perfect GMAT score....do you know how many of them have scored perfect score on at least two separate tests ?
NONE. ZERO. Yesterday out of fun, I have started to calculate probability of scoring perfect scores on multiple tests...I will present only probability to score perfect score here on GMAT and GRE (perfect on verbal and perfect on quant) :
30/200,000 * 17,427/1,700,000 * 52,3269/1,700,000....it comes to approximately 0.00000045....and that's only for GMAT & GRE perfect score.
Now, not only that none of Manhattan instructors did score perfect score on any two existing combination of tests, let me repeat all 77. of them...but one (ex-Manhattan) tutor supposedly scored perfect score on GMAT and GRE and GRE Mathematics Subject Test and SAT (only 10 times in a row) and LSAT and ACT.
To put that mildly, I would say that is highly unlikely !
I was wondering what is your opinion about it, just from scientific point of view, for the sake of truth, without mentioning names please ??
*GMAT figures are annual, GRE are for 3 years period, but that doesnt change the outcome, since I would just divide both numerator and denominator with 3, scaled them down, and still get the same result.