Last visit was: 17 May 2026, 21:11 It is currently 17 May 2026, 21:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rhyme
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 5,906
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
Posts: 5,906
Kudos: 3,193
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rhyme
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 5,906
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
Posts: 5,906
Kudos: 3,193
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You deserve a congrats for a prep score that high. Thats a (!@#(!#@# damn good prep score.
User avatar
walletless
Joined: 29 May 2006
Last visit: 01 Oct 2011
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Posts: 106
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow, thats a good score for the first test. Keep it up haas!
User avatar
chiragr
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Last visit: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 320
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
you are correct that there is +-30 point variation but still your score is good.

I would suggest that shoot for 750+ Q 50-51 and V 42-45.

Use divide and concur, find out your errors divide it in sub types-- for eg. in math not comfortable with rate/work problem or in SC idiom or comparison is issue than try to improve upon it.

More over work carefully on your timing so you can finish test, best luck with preparation.
avatar
likar
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Last visit: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Location: Prague, CZ
Posts: 61
Kudos: 501
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From my experience, I think it's very important not to get too excited about PowerPrep scores. I took both of these tests and I don't think they are as hard as GMATPrep. Quant is really easy and Verbal is simply different and in addition contains many repeated questions (especially in CR). On the other hand the new format of RC is much easier for me, since I don't have to scroll down the screen.

You could maybe take the first GMATPrep test, which would give you much more precise information, but it's also important to save some tests for the end of your preparation.
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for the suggestions chiragr.

I will classify my errors and start focussing more on them. As for timing, even for practice questions I am using the excel worksheet timer just to get within the timing range.


chiragr
you are correct that there is +-30 point variation but still your score is good.

I would suggest that shoot for 750+ Q 50-51 and V 42-45.

Use divide and concur, find out your errors divide it in sub types-- for eg. in math not comfortable with rate/work problem or in SC idiom or comparison is issue than try to improve upon it.

More over work carefully on your timing so you can finish test, best luck with preparation.
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thats an interesting point. I didn't realize that GMATPrep and PowerPrep have different difficulty levels.

When you say quant is easy you mean relatively GMATPrep is much tougher?

And I do agree, I shouldn't be too excited about a good practice score. :-) And actually am I not, just pleased that things aren't as bad as they could be. I know I have a lot of work ahead of me, especially in SC and Quant where I haven't seen the most difficult questions at all.

Will take a GMATPrep in a couple of weeks (first week of Sept) and see how that goes.

Thanks for your input.


likar
From my experience, I think it's very important not to get too excited about PowerPrep scores. I took both of these tests and I don't think they are as hard as GMATPrep. Quant is really easy and Verbal is simply different and in addition contains many repeated questions (especially in CR). On the other hand the new format of RC is much easier for me, since I don't have to scroll down the screen.

You could maybe take the first GMATPrep test, which would give you much more precise information, but it's also important to save some tests for the end of your preparation.
User avatar
walletless
Joined: 29 May 2006
Last visit: 01 Oct 2011
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Posts: 106
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think he means that PP quant is easier than actual gmat; while Gmatprep quant is roughly equivalent to the actual gmat.

I know a lot of member-posts before on this and other forums agreed with this statement.
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its good to know that... I didn't know how the PP and GMATPrep compare relatively.

I will know my trend better when I take some other test for the next two weeks and then work on the GMATPrep.
avatar
likar
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Last visit: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Location: Prague, CZ
Posts: 61
Kudos: 501
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Most people think that PowerPrep Quant is easy.

GMATPrep should be very similar to the real exam (in both, difficulty and concepts). GMATPrep Quant has more DS questions and more questions on number properties. I have also noticed that you can make more mistakes in GMATPrep Quant and still get a high score (48+), so I'm assuming that the scoring algorithm has probably changed as well.

However, scores from PowerPrep and GMATPrep don't differ that much. In my case, PowerPrep scores are approximately 20-40 points higher than GMATPrep scores. That's why I would say that PowerPrep is the second best indicator of your performance.

Good luck! :wink:
User avatar
deepak232
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Last visit: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Location: Not from Milky way
Posts: 35
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
well i think the new software is quite different from the earlier version that was sent by the ETS..

The new GMATPrep software is not only tough but it is actually harder as compared to the actual test... Although some people say that questions based on Permutation-Combinations are the ones which come in first 5 questions.. which were seen previosly by high scorers only...

i m not sure but i would like to hear from members who have taken the test in recent months...
User avatar
walletless
Joined: 29 May 2006
Last visit: 01 Oct 2011
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Posts: 106
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
deepak232
well i think the new software is quite different from the earlier version that was sent by the ETS..

The new GMATPrep software is not only tough but it is actually harder as compared to the actual test... Although some people say that questions based on Permutation-Combinations are the ones which come in first 5 questions.. which were seen previosly by high scorers only...

i m not sure but i would like to hear from members who have taken the test in recent months...


The correct phrase is not only .... but also. The use of "not only... but is" is both, unidiomatic and awkward.

Sorry, could not resist! Gotta love some OG explanations ;)
User avatar
deepak232
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Last visit: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Location: Not from Milky way
Posts: 35
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
walletless
deepak232
well i think the new software is quite different from the earlier version that was sent by the ETS..

The new GMATPrep software is not only tough but it is actually harder as compared to the actual test... Although some people say that questions based on Permutation-Combinations are the ones which come in first 5 questions.. which were seen previosly by high scorers only...

i m not sure but i would like to hear from members who have taken the test in recent months...

The correct phrase is not only .... but also. The use of "not only... but is" is both, unidiomatic and awkward.

Sorry, could not resist! Gotta love some OG explanations ;)


thnx a lot for your "sentence correction" exercise....
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Took the first GMATPrep results today morning with AWA.
The results echoed the previous postings as a lot of people have said : GMATPrep quant is definately more tougher. However, I had a bad timing issue, had to guess on the last 8!!!! Verbal was ok... but still had a timing issue... last two were guessed.

I need to work on my timing : BIG TIME...

Results:
Q44 (73%) ..this sucked!
V38 (85%)

Overall : 670 (89%).

Given the scores, I think I now know the things that I must work on.

Thanks for all the comments on this topic.
User avatar
rhyme
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 5,906
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
Posts: 5,906
Kudos: 3,193
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
haas_mba07

Q44 (73%) ..this sucked!
V38 (85%)

Overall : 670 (89%).


Hey, dont say a 44 sucks! I got a 45 :(

Good score - keep in mind, everyone I know does worse on their second exam --- too much in your head, too many strategies, a lot of people find their timing goes off on the second exam.
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rhyme,
Can't apologize enough to you and everyone else for unknowingly implying anything.. I didn't imply that 44 or for that matter any other score was bad.. it was more a reflection on my disappointment at my timing problems.

Thanks/

rhyme
haas_mba07

Q44 (73%) ..this sucked!
V38 (85%)

Overall : 670 (89%).

Hey, dont say a 44 sucks! I got a 45 :(

Good score - keep in mind, everyone I know does worse on their second exam --- too much in your head, too many strategies, a lot of people find their timing goes off on the second exam.
Moderators:
201 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
474 posts