Yes. At Q76 and DI76, I would not frame this as a matter of identifying a few weak topics. The scores suggest that you likely need much broader and deeper knowledge-building across both Quant and DI.
I would focus first on systematically rebuilding your Quant foundation across arithmetic, algebra, number properties, ratios, percentages, rates, work problems, averages, statistics, overlapping sets, inequalities, exponents, roots, and word problems. Just as important, you need to develop the skills and techniques for recognizing what a question is testing, translating it into math, choosing an efficient solution path, and executing accurately.
The same applies to DI. You need broad competence across Data Sufficiency, Two-Part Analysis, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, and Multi-Source Reasoning, along with the underlying Quant, verbal reasoning, data interpretation, estimation, and calculation skills those question types require.
So I would not recommend simply drilling the topics that currently feel weakest. You need a comprehensive study process that builds the content knowledge, problem-solving skills, strategies, and pattern recognition necessary to handle the full range of questions you can see on test day.
The fact that Two-Part Analysis and Table Analysis questions are sometimes taking around five minutes and still ending in incorrect answers is another sign that the issue is probably deeper than pacing. When the underlying knowledge and solving process become stronger, your timing should improve as a consequence.
At this stage, I would prioritize comprehensive mastery over trying to find a handful of high-yield topics or shortcuts.
Good luck!
-Scott, TTP