Sorry for posting a newbie question. Now that Columbia has put me on the dreaded waitlist, I need to add one more school to my portfolio. My very basic requirements from the schools are:
* Bright fellow students who would have similar interests
* School's clear focus on Entrepreneurship (Kellogg's brochures, info sessions and alumni do not talk about entrepreneurship at all, which is a warning-sign, for example)
* Very frequent opportunities to connect with VCs (Tuck may have some problems because of its location?)
* Opportunities to develop my soft-skills -- usually underestimated skills that a successful entrepreneur needs (My interaction with MIT Sloan's students has kept questioning if there's a chance you get in 'nerd' and get out 'nerd' from Sloan)
The schools that I am considering are: MIT, Chicago, Kellogg and Tuck (
I am intentionally keeping UC Berkeley out of the race. If all else fails, I may have to apply to UC Berkeley's part-time program in Feb 08. Thank you for the great idea, prasad
.. see I am not applying to the same round as you, so we can still be friends.)
I've been trying to pick one school from these 4 for a long time .. but every few days, my opinion changes. When it comes to my MBA dreams, you guys know about it as much as I do. So, maybe I should leverage things you guys learned about these schools in your researches. So what do you guys say? 2007ers? 2008ers? Which school would you recommend for me?
ps. I have time to apply R1 at MIT. But in case of other schools, I'll apply R2 only.