Last visit was: 19 May 2026, 08:02 It is currently 19 May 2026, 08:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
osbornecox
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 373
Own Kudos:
80
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mba2013
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Dec 2011
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Ross '13
Posts: 162
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shadow
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 01 Nov 2016
Posts: 928
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 113
Affiliations: Consortium (CGSM.org), NSHMBA
Location: New Haven
Schools:Yale SOM Class of 2012
WE 1: Investment Banking Summer Associate (Boutique tech M&A)
Products:
Posts: 928
Kudos: 252
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
LetsGoMets
Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Last visit: 18 Aug 2024
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Emory 2012
GPA: 2.5 Applied Math Major
WE 1: 1 yr proprietary trading
WE 2: 2 yrs global ibank in municipal derivatives
Products:
Posts: 248
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like this metric a lot. One flaw that will arise here is that relatively new programs will be slower to move up even if they're deserving (and similarly, established schools will be slow to fall). Other than that, I think it's pretty cool.

When you get bored, if you want to calculate through the top 25-30, I'd be curious where everything stacks up.
User avatar
osbornecox
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 373
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LetsGoMets
I like this metric a lot. One flaw that will arise here is that relatively new programs will be slower to move up even if they're deserving (and similarly, established schools will be slow to fall). Other than that, I think it's pretty cool.

When you get bored, if you want to calculate through the top 25-30, I'd be curious where everything stacks up.

Hey LetsGoMets, glad to hear from you again!

I find that the flaw you've identified is at its most relevant when it comes to established schools, because they might live a bit too long off the toils of their predecessors/past successes. However, I think it's a valid measure for the newer, up-and-coming schools: because it is a per-capita measure rather than an absolute endowment measure, it will capture an early breakthrough for a young program, and which can propel the young school up the "rankings" (a new $10 million donation for a young program with a small alumni base will do a lot more - in absolute and per capita terms - than $10 million at HBS would).

Rather than measure the success of the alumni pool and the love felt by the alumni for the alma mater (which it sort of does), by including donations from wealthy individuals or from corporations, it is also factoring in a "general popularity from a capitalist point of view" issue.

Now I have to go to sleep. My week has not begun well... when it starts to look better, I'll dig out the data for the top 30 schools. Feel free to help me out, you're on vacation! :P
User avatar
osbornecox
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 373
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shadowsjc
There are 2 main sites that I'd use to gather the data you're looking for:
Endowment: Wikipedia
Living MBA Alumni: Businessweek (Alumni affairs and Careers tab from the school profile page; example: https://www.businessweek.com/bschools/ra ... rvard.html, then go to Alumni Affairs & Careers tab)

Going through your top 5, I get the following per capita numbers:

Stanford
Endowment: 755M
Living alumni: 16596
Per capita: 45493

HBS
Endowment: 2.1B (edit - using 2009 values which are more recent)
Living alumni: 43062
Per capita: 48769

MIT Sloan
Endowment: 657M
Living alumni: 21000
Per capita: 31286

Tuck
Endowment: 256.4M
Living alumni: 8787
Per capita: 29179

Booth
Endowment: 800M
Living alumni: 43795
Per capita: 18266

Therefore, with the information I was able to find, I'd switch HBS and Stanford. Also, one notable omission on your list was Yale SOM. From Wiki, its 2009 endowment was 444M, and from Businessweek, they have 5788 living MBA alumni. This yields a per capita of $76710, which would put it at the top of the list.

Shadowsjsc, thanks for this info. I think that the numbers depict Yale SOM quite favorably :)

I used a blend of sources; Wikipedia and BWeek were not satisfactory for every school. Schools themselves disclose a lot of this, but the information isn't always centralized.
avatar
LetsGoMets
Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Last visit: 18 Aug 2024
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Emory 2012
GPA: 2.5 Applied Math Major
WE 1: 1 yr proprietary trading
WE 2: 2 yrs global ibank in municipal derivatives
Products:
Posts: 248
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
osbornecox
LetsGoMets
I like this metric a lot. One flaw that will arise here is that relatively new programs will be slower to move up even if they're deserving (and similarly, established schools will be slow to fall). Other than that, I think it's pretty cool.

When you get bored, if you want to calculate through the top 25-30, I'd be curious where everything stacks up.

Hey LetsGoMets, glad to hear from you again!

I find that the flaw you've identified is at its most relevant when it comes to established schools, because they might live a bit too long off the toils of their predecessors/past successes. However, I think it's a valid measure for the newer, up-and-coming schools: because it is a per-capita measure rather than an absolute endowment measure, it will capture an early breakthrough for a young program, and which can propel the young school up the "rankings" (a new $10 million donation for a young program with a small alumni base will do a lot more - in absolute and per capita terms - than $10 million at HBS would).

Rather than measure the success of the alumni pool and the love felt by the alumni for the alma mater (which it sort of does), by including donations from wealthy individuals or from corporations, it is also factoring in a "general popularity from a capitalist point of view" issue.

Now I have to go to sleep. My week has not begun well... when it starts to look better, I'll dig out the data for the top 30 schools. Feel free to help me out, you're on vacation! :P


My classes start tomorrow. I already have homework. Vacation is officially over.
User avatar
3underscore
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 1,428
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: New York, NY
Concentration: Finance (Corp Fin, Financial Instruments)
Schools:NYU Stern 2009
Posts: 1,428
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This measure gets skewed in some odd ways though. There are a lot of Booth alumni who get a free ride on donations through Mr Booth and his $300m or so. Then there are people like Paulson at NYU who gave money to development projects and professor seats only. I like the idea, though. Including that I currently feel the $85k in fees I gave to my school was adequate donating.
User avatar
Jerz
Joined: 09 Dec 2008
Last visit: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 1,221
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Health Enterprise Management, Marketing, Strategy, Finance, Analytical Consulting, Economics
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V47
Posts: 1,221
Kudos: 254
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One other factor that will skew this is investment returns on the endowments. If School A and School B both start the year with $1000 in endowment and 1000 alumni, they have the same per capita endowment. If School A earns a 10% return while School B earns 5%, now School A looks better although its alumni may not be any more engaged or enthusiastic. An improvement would be to look at avg annual donation per alumni - this would also make the case of the good Mr. Booth a one-off event rather than something that would skew the metric year after year. However, I don't know if schools make public their donations reports like charities do...
User avatar
osbornecox
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 373
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Jerz, you're right, which is why I included the caveat of "Of course this metric has imperfections, as there are plenty of donors who are NOT alumni, and it assumes equal asset management performance on behalf of endowment fund managers)."
To be honest, I'm not sure how we can get around that. In an ideal world, the endowment managers would all be alumni, and then we could establish a like for like comparison in their asset management skills :)
User avatar
osbornecox
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 373
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3underscore
This measure gets skewed in some odd ways though. There are a lot of Booth alumni who get a free ride on donations through Mr Booth and his $300m or so. Then there are people like Paulson at NYU who gave money to development projects and professor seats only. I like the idea, though. Including that I currently feel the $85k in fees I gave to my school was adequate donating.

They're waiting for you to set up Manchester's best hedge fund :P