Question 1
krittapat
GMATNinja VeritasKarishma egmat mikemcgarryCould you please help explain question 1?
I selected B, and I still don't see anything wrong with this option since it's clearly stated in the last sentence of the last paragraph that it's less profitable to file a lawsuit again those firms ( I think those firms mean small firms and unionized companies).
Let's start by considering the meaning of the last line in the context of the passage as a whole:
Earlier in the passage, we are told that Dertouzos and Karoly performed a study which found that wrongful termination laws caused a drop in employment rate. The last sentence adds the following additional results from their study:
- The impact on employment was smallest in manufacturing, "where unions have already institutionalized similar protection."
- The impact on employment was smallest in smaller firms, because smaller firms have less ability to pay damages, so wrongful-termination lawsuits against them are less likely to be profitable.
Let's consider answer choice (B):
Quote:
1)The passage suggests which of the following regarding wrongful-termination lawsuits?
B) It is less profitable to file wrongful-termination lawsuits against unionized companies than against companies without unions.
The last sentence tells us that
unionized companies "have already institutionalized" protections that are similar to wrongful termination laws. But it doesn't tell us anything about whether lawsuits against unionized companies are likely to be
profitable. Eliminate (B).
Let's now consider (D):
Quote:
D) Obtaining financial compensation is an important motivation for filing wrongful-termination lawsuits.
The last sentence tells us that small firms were less affected by wrongful termination laws, most likely because they have less ability to pay damages, so wrongful termination lawsuits against them are
less likely to be profitable.
But
why does the lower likelihood of profit explain why smaller firms were less affected by wrongful termination laws? Although the author doesn't connect these dots EXPLICITLY, the argument does SUGGEST that people are less likely to file lawsuits if they are
less likely to be profitable. Because if that's true, it would explain why smaller firms were less affected by wrongful termination laws (i.e. because fewer people filed these lawsuits against them).
So although the author never says this
explicitly, the argument
suggests that "financial compensation is an important motivation for filing wrongful-termination lawsuits." In other words, the argument suggests that fewer people file wrongful termination lawsuits against smaller firms
because they'd probably get a
smaller compensation In short, the author SUGGESTS that because lawsuits against smaller firms are "less likely to be profitable," people are
less motivated to file them, so (D) is correct.
I hope that helps!