nfr007
Movie critics often disagree with one another regarding their opinions of current releases, but they all agree that a good movie must contain quality acting,
an engaging plot, and a climax that is exciting.a) an engaging plot, and a climax that is exciting
b) an engaging plot while having an exciting climax
c) an engaging plot, and an exciting climax
d) a plot that is engaging, and a climax that is exciting
e) a plot that is engaging, and an exciting climax
Dear
nfr007,
I'm happy to help.

I must say, I am not fond of this question, for a few reasons. It seems to me particularly un-GMAT-like.
The question hinges on the parallelism, which in the original is
// quality acting
//an engaging plot,
and
//a climax that is excitingFirst of all, we need the three elements to be in parallel, so
(B) is completely incorrect.
It's true that "
a climax that is exciting" is about as flaccid and livy-livered as one could imagine. There is zero reason to say "
a climax that is exciting" when one could say "
an engaging climax." Much of the question seems to depend on distinguish the correct phrasing, in the second or third element, from its paper tiger counterpart. Part of what is un-GMAT-like about this is there's nothing particularly tempting about the wrong choices. If you recognize how atrocious the "
[noun] that is [adjective]" form is, then right there, the question is over. The answer has to be
(C).
There's only one issue this question is exploring, which is also not particularly GMAT-like. A good GMAT SC question typically explores several different grammatical/ logical/ rhetorical issues at once. Here's a high quality practice question:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/3284Does all this make sense?
Mike