Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring seg

Question

Competition Mode Question

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring segregation in public places; the 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964, prohibiting the poll tax; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which ordered the state  should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.

A. should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
B. would abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
C. to abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
D. abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
E. the abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote

EncounterGMAT · Answer

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring segregation in public places; the 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964, prohibiting the poll tax; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which ordered the state  should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.

A.  should  abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. -usage of 'should' incorrect and wordy

B.  would  abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. -usage of 'would' incorrect-the passage is sure about the law and not usage of a possibility word is incorrect.

C.  to abolish  literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.  CORRECT

D.  abolishing  of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. -changes the meaning and unwanted usage of gerund.

E.  the abolishing  of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote- same as option D

joohwangie · Answer

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring segregation in public places; the 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964, prohibiting the poll tax; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which ordered the state should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.

A. should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. wrong idiom
B. would abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. would doesn't make sense
C.  to abolish  literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.  correct ordered x to y 
D. abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. ordered x abolishing doesn't sound right
E. the abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. ordered the state the abolishing wrong

therefore C

eakabuah · Answer

Options A and B are not correct because “should” and “would” do not reflect the command in order to maintain the meaning of the sentence. Should and would suggest that the it is at the discretion of the state to abolish the literacy test, which is not the case here.

E and D are also incorrect because the use of “abolishing of” does not appropriately reflect the requirement by the Act. An infinitive is appropriate.

C is correct as it rightly use the infinitive form of the verb to reflect the requirement or command in the Act. The use of “to abolish” is correct here and correctly reflect the meaning of the sentence.

Posted from my mobile device

Archit3110 · Answer

subjunctive type error ; IMO C ;
to abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring segregation in public places; the 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964, prohibiting the poll tax; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which ordered the state  should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.

A. should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. in correct
B. would abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.in correct
C. to abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. correct
D. abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. in correct
E. the abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to votein correct

pzgupta · Answer

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring segregation in public places; the 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964, prohibiting the poll tax; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which ordered the state  should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.

A. should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
B. would abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
C. to abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
D. abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
E. the abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote

The Act ordered... needs "to". Only option which has it is C. IMO C

exc4libur · Answer

MEANING
"Among the triumphs of the era were Civil Rights, 24th Amendment and Voting Rights, which ORDERED the state TO abolish…"
We need to show intent, thus "to abolish"; the other choices have verb tense errors or unintended meanings.

Answer (C)

unraveled · Answer

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring segregation in public places; the 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964, prohibiting the poll tax; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which ordered the state  should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote .

The sentence has a list of three items 
- Civil Rights Act of 1964
- 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964
- the 1965 Voting Rights Act

and each of the items is provided with brief detail. As per the third the state was ordered to abolish literacy where ‘ordered’ is the verb – a commanding verb and ‘should abolish’ is the Voting Rights Act’s intention. Observing the answer choices there’re no other differences among them.

A. should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. – WRONG. A helping verb ‘should’ doesn’t communicate intention. 
B. would abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. – WRONG. Same as option ‘A’.
C. to abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. – CORRECT. ‘To + Verb’ s used for intentional purpose.
D. abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote. – WRONG. Verb+ing form of abolish with a prepositional phrase is not used for communicating intention.
E. the abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote – WRONG. Here ‘the’ is added to option D however it’s still not error free.

IMO Answer (C).

RastogiSarthak99 · Answer

It has got to be C. which ordered the state "to" abolish. Using the order for the verb abolish.

Bunuel · Answer

Official Explantion

Correct Answer: C 
 
The infinitive to abolish follows the verb ordered, producing the grammatical and idiomatic sequence X ordered Y to do Z.

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring seg

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Among the eras triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring seg

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards