Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
May 0312:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
May 0301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
11 Apr 2020, 22:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
72% (01:02) correct
28%
(01:34)
wrong
based on 745
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Considered a pseudoscience, or false science, even during the height of its popularity, yet phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel a patient’s head for bumps they believed revealed aspects of personality, character, and health.
A) yet phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel
B) some psychiatrists and neurologists took phrenology seriously and felt
C) phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel
D) some psychiatrists and neurologists took phrenology seriously, feeling
E) phrenology being taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists that felt
11 Apr 2020, 22:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
Just for the sake of an accurate historical record, phrenology was much more mainstream in certain countries such as Scotland and the United States than this sentence suggests.
According to Oxford Dictionary online, phrenology is the detailed study of the shape and size of the cranium as a supposed indication of character and mental abilities.
What were practitioners looking for when they examined other human beings' heads?
Bumps and hollows, the size of the cranium, or the slope of the lower skull, to name just a few things.
• Split #1 - Dangling modifier
What was considered a pseudoscience, or false science? Phrenology.
-- Phrenology, the noun, should immediately follow the introductory description; otherwise, we have a dangling or misplaced modifier.
(I don't care whether you know the jargon. Just understand how these modifiers work.)
-- The noun modifier "Touch Rule" states that a noun should be as close as possible to the noun that it modifies.
When an intro is anchored by a past or present participle (a verbED or a verbING word), the noun it modifies must be the subject of the immediately following clause. Almost always, that noun will show up right after the comma.
Options B and D use some psychiatrists and neurologists rather than the correct noun, phrenology. Wrong noun. Modifier error.
Eliminate B and D
• Split #2: fragment - or, the case of the Missing Verb
If we strip this sentence and insert option E, we have this sentence:
Considered a pseudoscience, phrenology being taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists that felt a patient’s head for bumps.
This sentence has no working verb.
Sentences without working verbs are called fragments.
Option E also uses the word that rather than the correct who to refer to some psychiatrists and neurologists.
GMAC is very strict about this rule: who refers to people and may not refer to things, whereas that refers to things and may not refer to people.
Typically I have seen exceptions to rules at least in non-underlined portions of official questions.
I have never seen a single exception to this rule in an official question.
In jargon, the relative pronoun who refers only to human beings whereas the relative pronoun that refers to things and non-human living beings.
Eliminate option E
• Split #3: logic and clarity
The only difference between options A and C is the presence of the word yet in option A.
This split is a lot harder than it seems.
Here's the problem with option A: the word yet is being used as a subordinating conjunction, in the sense of "but," or "nevertheless," or even "but nevertheless."
Those kinds of words start "subordinate" clauses that are dependent on another full independent clause, a "main clause"—and in the case of option A, there isn't such a main clause.
This clause cannot stand on its own:
Yet phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel a patient’s head for bumps.
Now look at Considered a pseudoscience, or false science, even during the height of its popularity.
-- That one is not a full sentence, either. It is not an independent clause with a subject and a verb that can stand on its own.
Option A lacks an independent clause.
Eliminate option A.
The answer is C.
Notes
→ Would feel is okay
We can use the helping verb would + base form of verb to indicate repeated or habitual actions in the past; such use is common when we are describing "contradictory" or unexpected behavior.
→ When an introduction is anchored by a participle, past (verbED) or present (verbING), look for noun modifier problems.
-- the noun described by the intro phrase should be the subject of the subsequent clause, and most of the time, that noun will be the first word after the comma
-- a "dangling modifier" is a descriptive phrase or clause that is inappropriately placed and appears to modify the wrong noun.
COMMENTS
I will give you the answer to my question from my last OE.
The only country ever to have defeated the armies and/or navies of the British, the Spanish, and the French is Haiti, which was the second country in the western hemisphere to win its independence from colonial England. (The first country to do so was the U.S.)
On a more topical note, these answers are good. Kudos to all.
Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
Quote:
Just for the sake of an accurate historical record, phrenology was much more mainstream in certain countries such as Scotland and the United States than this sentence suggests.
According to Oxford Dictionary online, phrenology is the detailed study of the shape and size of the cranium as a supposed indication of character and mental abilities.
What were practitioners looking for when they examined other human beings' heads?
Bumps and hollows, the size of the cranium, or the slope of the lower skull, to name just a few things.
• Split #1 - Dangling modifier
What was considered a pseudoscience, or false science? Phrenology.
-- Phrenology, the noun, should immediately follow the introductory description; otherwise, we have a dangling or misplaced modifier.
(I don't care whether you know the jargon. Just understand how these modifiers work.)
-- The noun modifier "Touch Rule" states that a noun should be as close as possible to the noun that it modifies.
When an intro is anchored by a past or present participle (a verbED or a verbING word), the noun it modifies must be the subject of the immediately following clause. Almost always, that noun will show up right after the comma.
Options B and D use some psychiatrists and neurologists rather than the correct noun, phrenology. Wrong noun. Modifier error.
Eliminate B and D
• Split #2: fragment - or, the case of the Missing Verb
If we strip this sentence and insert option E, we have this sentence:
Considered a pseudoscience, phrenology being taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists that felt a patient’s head for bumps.
This sentence has no working verb.
Sentences without working verbs are called fragments.
Option E also uses the word that rather than the correct who to refer to some psychiatrists and neurologists.
GMAC is very strict about this rule: who refers to people and may not refer to things, whereas that refers to things and may not refer to people.
Typically I have seen exceptions to rules at least in non-underlined portions of official questions.
I have never seen a single exception to this rule in an official question.
In jargon, the relative pronoun who refers only to human beings whereas the relative pronoun that refers to things and non-human living beings.
Eliminate option E
• Split #3: logic and clarity
The only difference between options A and C is the presence of the word yet in option A.
This split is a lot harder than it seems.
Here's the problem with option A: the word yet is being used as a subordinating conjunction, in the sense of "but," or "nevertheless," or even "but nevertheless."
Those kinds of words start "subordinate" clauses that are dependent on another full independent clause, a "main clause"—and in the case of option A, there isn't such a main clause.
This clause cannot stand on its own:
Yet phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel a patient’s head for bumps.
Now look at Considered a pseudoscience, or false science, even during the height of its popularity.
-- That one is not a full sentence, either. It is not an independent clause with a subject and a verb that can stand on its own.
Option A lacks an independent clause.
Eliminate option A.
The answer is C.
Notes
→ Would feel is okay
We can use the helping verb would + base form of verb to indicate repeated or habitual actions in the past; such use is common when we are describing "contradictory" or unexpected behavior.
→ When an introduction is anchored by a participle, past (verbED) or present (verbING), look for noun modifier problems.
-- the noun described by the intro phrase should be the subject of the subsequent clause, and most of the time, that noun will be the first word after the comma
-- a "dangling modifier" is a descriptive phrase or clause that is inappropriately placed and appears to modify the wrong noun.
COMMENTS
I will give you the answer to my question from my last OE.
The only country ever to have defeated the armies and/or navies of the British, the Spanish, and the French is Haiti, which was the second country in the western hemisphere to win its independence from colonial England. (The first country to do so was the U.S.)
On a more topical note, these answers are good. Kudos to all.
11 Apr 2020, 22:41
Kudos
Bookmarks
IMO C
A) yet phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel
Use of yet is incorrect. Next to comma, modified noun should come
B) some psychiatrists and neurologists took phrenology seriously and felt
Incorrectly modifying some psychiatrists and neurologists. Hence incorrect
C) phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel
Correct answer
D) some psychiatrists and neurologists took phrenology seriously, feeling
Incorrectly modifying some psychiatrists and neurologists. Hence incorrect
E) phrenology being taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists that felt
Being is incorrect and also pronoun error that. Hence eliminate
A) yet phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel
Use of yet is incorrect. Next to comma, modified noun should come
B) some psychiatrists and neurologists took phrenology seriously and felt
Incorrectly modifying some psychiatrists and neurologists. Hence incorrect
C) phrenology was taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists, who would feel
Correct answer
D) some psychiatrists and neurologists took phrenology seriously, feeling
Incorrectly modifying some psychiatrists and neurologists. Hence incorrect
E) phrenology being taken seriously by some psychiatrists and neurologists that felt
Being is incorrect and also pronoun error that. Hence eliminate
