OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
If
there was any truth to recent findings, inactivity is as deadly than smoking.
• Verbs? The phrase "recent findings" suggests the present time
• Conditionals (IF/THEN)?
For general truths or scientific findings, also called "zero conditionals" (because they are always true) we use
→ IF simple present, THEN simple present
→ If THIS thing happens, then THAT thing happens
• Idiom?
AS . . . AS
→ He is
as tall as his brother.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) there
was any truth to recent findings, inactivity is
as deadly
than•
was should be
is→ the findings are recent
→ conditional statements ("if" statements) must be constructed a certain way. The use of simple past tense was in the IF clause incorrectly indicates a Type 2 conditional.
When the IF clause uses simple past, we have a type 2 conditional in which the result clause is rendered in present conditional (If X happened, then Y would happen)
Type 2 conditionals refer to a hypothetical condition and its probable result.
This question does not involve a Type 2 conditional.
• idiomatic error
Wrong:
as deadly
thanELIMINATE A
Quote:
B) there
was any truth to recent findings, inactivity is as deadly as
•
was should be
isSee the analysis in option A.
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) there
has been any truth to recent findings, inactivity is as deadly as
•
has been (present perfect) is the wrong verb tense
→ In IF/THEN statements that refer to general truths, the verbs are both in simple present tense
ELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) there is any truth to recent findings, inactivity is as deadly as
• I see no errors
• This option contains the correct verbs for a statement of general truth—namely, simple present
IF simple present (is), THEN simple present (is)
Quote:
E) there is any truth to recent findings, inactivity is
as deadly
than• the correct idiom is
as deadly as, not
as deadly
thanELIMINATE E
The best answer is D.COMMENTSI'll keep this wrap-up brief because the election calls.
These explanations range from good to very good. Kudos go to those whose answer would make sense to an aspirant with some exposure to SC.