Bunuel
The Mayan people subsisted on a diet primarily consisting of maize, squash, beans, and peppers,
but incorporated both meat from animals they hunted and fished.
A. but incorporated both meat from animals they hunted and fished
B. and also had incorporated the meat from animals they hunted and fished
C. even though they incorporated meat from animals they hunted and fished for as well
D. although they also incorporated meat from hunting and fishing
E. but incorporating the meat from animals they hunted and fished for
As Brunel has mentioned - The sentence contains a logical contrast between the food the Mayan “primarily” ate and the food that made up the rest of their diet. This requires a contrasting conjunction.
I approached it a bit differently. I understood that the past after the comma should be a clause. MY analysis is as follows:
A. but incorporated both meat from animals they hunted and fished -
because of connecting word 'and' I read it as meat from animals they hunted and meat from animals they fished, which seems illogicalB. and also had incorporated the meat from animals they hunted and fished -
eliminated because of 'had' - past perfect, which is not needed hereC. even though they incorporated meat from animals they hunted and fished for as well -
use of 'and' and 'as well'D. although they also incorporated meat from hunting and fishing -
correctE. but incorporating the meat from animals they hunted and fished for -
parallelism error between hunted and fished for and also _ing form of incorporating