First of all, this is a
MUST BE TRUE (or MAIN POINT) question,
NOT STRENGTHEN question. The question asks you to
find an answer that is SUPPORTED BY the stimulus. The question does not ask you to find an answer that supports the argument.
Technically,
the stimulus in "must be true" question does
NOT have a conclusion, just FACTS. There are two types of correct answer:
(1) Paraphrase: a sentence in the stimulus is paraphrased.
(2) Combination: two or more facts in the stimulus are combined.ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:Fact 1: Most scientists believe that the decay of the ozone layer is a cause of global warming.
Fact 2: With a weaker ozone layer, additional wavelengths of light reach the earth.
Fact 3: The decay of the ozone layer, which enables more harmful wavelengths of light to reach the earth's surface, is also believed to cause permanent eye damage in some animals.
Question: Which of the following is most strongly
supported by the statements above?
ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:A) All wavelengths of light from the sun that damage the eyes of animals are blocked by a healthy ozone layer.
Wrong. The stimulus does NOT say that. A is NOT SUPPORTED by the stimulus.
B) Some animals do not experience damage to their eyes when exposed to unfiltered waves of light.
Wrong. The stimulus does NOT say that.
C) Only a handful of animal species live in places where they are exposed to the damaging light waves.
Wrong. Same error as in A and B.
D) The rising temperature of the earth poses a severe threat to animals.
Wrong. The stimulus does NOT say that.
E) Some wavelengths of light that engender eye damage in certain animals are more likely to hit the earth due to ozone decay.
Correct. E is paraphrased version of fact#3. E is a must be true answer --> correct.
Hope it helps.