Networks of blood vessels in bats' wings serve only to disperse heat generated in flight. This heat is generated only because bats flap their wings. Thus paleontologists' recent discovery that the winged dinosaur Sandactylus had similar networks of blood vessels in the skin of its wings provides evidence for the hypothesis that Sandactylus flew by flapping its wings, not just by gliding.
Inthe passage, the author develops the argument by
(A) forming the hypothesis that best explains several apparently conflicting pieces of evidence
(B) reinterpreting evidence that had been used to support an earlier theory
(C) using an analogy with a known phenomenon to draw a conclusion about an unknown phenomenon
(D) speculating about how structures observed in present-day creatures might have developed from similar
structures in creatures now extinct
(E) pointing out differences in the physiological demands that flight makes on large, as opposed to small, creatures
Official Answer is C.
My problem is I choosed down to B and C, and selected B, and got wrong!!!! The reason I eliminate C is
1. The phenomenon was not unknown, in question stimulus you find the word "hypothesis", so the analogy of flight technique of bats and Sandactylus was not unknown.
The reasons I chose B are
1. "the winged dinosaur Sandactylus had similar networks of blood vessels" was an evidence
2. this evidence was reintrepeting to establish same flight technique
3. this evidence also was supporting earlier percieved theory that birds network of blood vessels in their wings usually fly by gliding and sometimes flapping their wings.
4. I thought this was a strengthening question "the author develops the argument by", if only a newly discovered evidence support the earlier theory, then the argument will be "developed"
Please, help me finding my misunderstandings...!!!